Chandigarh: Punjab leader of opposition Partap Singh Bajwa on Tuesday welcomed the Supreme Court’s stance against glaring irregularities in the recently concluded panchayat elections in Punjab. He said that the AAP-led govt’s manipulation of the election process has drawn severe criticism from the court, which highlighted the troubling fact that 3,000 out of 13,000 gram panchayat posts were filled unopposed. “The Chief Justice of India, Sanjiv Khanna, termed this number substantial, raising serious concerns about the integrity of the elections,” he said.
The Supreme Court, while hearing a batch of petitions challenging the Punjab and Haryana high court’s dismissal of over 800 cases of arbitrary rejection of nomination papers, expressed grave displeasure over the procedural lapses. The preponing of hearings without adequate notice to the petitioners was described by the Chief Justice as “very strange.” He remarked, “This is something unimaginable. I have never seen such figures!” TNN
We also published the following articles recently

15-day notice, videography of demolition: Supreme Court issues guidelines on bulldozer justice
In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court has issued strict guidelines for property demolitions, emphasizing due process and condemning 'bulldozer justice'. The court stressed that only the judiciary can determine guilt and that demolishing homes based on accusations is unconstitutional. The guidelines mandate show cause notices, video recording of demolitions, and compensation for unlawful actions.
Demolition of properties: Why Supreme Court declared 'bulldozer justice' illegal
In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court has issued strict guidelines to halt the unlawful demolition of homes belonging to accused individuals. The court emphasized that 'bulldozer justice' violates fundamental rights and undermines the rule of law. The guidelines mandate due process, prohibit collective punishment, and ensure accountability for arbitrary actions by authorities.
Ban on WhatsApp in India: Here's what Supreme Court said
The Supreme Court rejected a plea to ban WhatsApp over privacy and security concerns. The petitioner, Omanakuttan KG, argued that a vulnerability in the app could compromise user privacy and national security. This echoed his previous unsuccessful attempt in the Kerala High Court.
End of Article
FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA