midian182

Posts: 10,165   +135
Staff member
In brief: We're less than one year away from Windows 10's end-of-life date. Microsoft has already revealed how much businesses will have to pay if they want to continue receiving official support after October 14, 2025. Now, the company has announced that customers will also be able to purchase Extended Security Updates (ESU) for $30 for one year, with no option to continue beyond that period.

With Windows 10, Microsoft is allowing both consumers and businesses to enroll in its ESU program. The Redmond giant revealed in April that enterprise and education customers will be able to pay $61 per device for the first year of ESUs, $122 for the second year, and $244 in the third – doubling every year.

For the first time ever, Microsoft is also introducing ESUs for personal use. It will cost users $30 to continue receiving Critical and Important security updates for Windows 10 after the October 14 date. However, consumers will only be eligible to receive a single year of these updates. Microsoft notes that new features, bug fixes, and technical support will not be included in the program.

Microsoft is likely making the ESUs available to consumers due to Windows 10's enduring popularity. It was still the most commonly used OS among Steam survey participants in September, having retaken the lead from Windows 11 with a 48.6% share. Globally, Windows 10's 61% share is around 25% higher than its predecessor, though Windows 11 has been making gains recently.

Microsoft will reveal details on how consumers can enroll in the ESU program next year, closer to Windows 10's end-of-support date.

Microsoft also wrote that Microsoft Defender Antivirus in Windows 10 would continue to get new definitions updates through at least October 2028.

Microsoft would rather people move to Windows 11 rather than paying for ESUs – the announcement post is called 'How to prepare for Windows 10 end of support by moving to Windows 11.' It goes into detail about the benefits of Windows 11 and how to check if your PC can run the latest version.

Those hardware demands are one of the big reasons why Windows 11 adoption has been slow. The OS' requirements include support for TPM 2.0 security chips, meaning it can't run on older machines. There are workarounds, of course, such as the recent Flyby11 tool that bypasses these restrictions.

In June, 0patch, a "microscopic" patching solution for Windows and other software products, announced its plan to support Windows 10 22H2, offering in-memory micropatches for at least five years.

Permalink to story:

 
We most people won't upgrade for free, your upgrade is terrible.
 
0patch offers a better upgrade experience. They've always patched severe issues faster and more completely than Microsoft. I currently use the free version to get zero day vulnerabilities patched right away. Eventually, Microsoft patches take precedence, when they're finally released. If you have to use Windows 10, you can with five more years of patches.
 
Seriously, why would I want to pay money for running MSWin10????? It's a horrible OS as well.

Moving from MSWin10 to MSWin11 is going from BAD to WORSE. Kind of like going from Je Biden to Commie-La Harris.
 
Thought there was some enterprising person / company out there that was offering a subscription service for all future patch's??? Not that I'm worried, but I thought I read that on here awhile back .....
 
Thought there was some enterprising person / company out there that was offering a subscription service for all future patch's??? Not that I'm worried, but I thought I read that on here awhile back .....
There is. It's called 0patch. Seems to offer better support too (up to 5 years).
 
0patch offers a better upgrade experience. They've always patched severe issues faster and more completely than Microsoft. I currently use the free version to get zero day vulnerabilities patched right away. Eventually, Microsoft patches take precedence, when they're finally released. If you have to use Windows 10, you can with five more years of patches.
0 day vunerability "patches" that the FREE iteration of this software implemement isn't going to do anything for an EoL OS. You're going to have to pay 0patch a fee as well if you want a fully patched operating system after the operating system isn't supported by microsoft anymore. There's a free "enterprise" trial or something in the software BTW that'll unlock the full version of 0patch for a month.

The free version of this software is perfectly fine for both windows 10 and 11 RIGHT NOW since it's patching 0 day stuff until microsoft picks up the slack and if you read about how 0patch patches the vulnerabilities you'll realize its not actually a patch, it's modifying said vulnerable process' memory, which takes time and leaves your system open to attack before the "patching" happens. An actual patch by microsoft actually fixes the vulnerable code itself on a permanent level.

This software is kinda like a VPN. It adds a layer of protection that really isn't protection if people know what they're doing.
 
0 day vunerability "patches" that the FREE iteration of this software implemement isn't going to do anything for an EoL OS. You're going to have to pay 0patch a fee as well if you want a fully patched operating system after the operating system isn't supported by microsoft anymore. There's a free "enterprise" trial or something in the software BTW that'll unlock the full version of 0patch for a month.

The free version of this software is perfectly fine for both windows 10 and 11 RIGHT NOW since it's patching 0 day stuff until microsoft picks up the slack and if you read about how 0patch patches the vulnerabilities you'll realize its not actually a patch, it's modifying said vulnerable process' memory, which takes time and leaves your system open to attack before the "patching" happens. An actual patch by microsoft actually fixes the vulnerable code itself on a permanent level.

This software is kinda like a VPN. It adds a layer of protection that really isn't protection if people know what they're doing.
This reads like you've never used 0patch and are providing assumptions as facts. I've used it for six years. I suggest you read their information in detail.
 
The $30 offer is an interesting hedge. When Microsoft is sued for losses caused in part by defects in their product, being able to say it is the customer's fault for not paying $30 will sound a lot more reasonable than claiming it was the customer's fault for not throwing out an otherwise perfectly good computer. This buys them a year of a semi-defensible position during which they can evaluate what is happening both with consumer behavior in replacing PCs, and in the economic impact of large numbers of completely unprotected devices.

Personally, I think they are still being grossly negligent, and I hope our legal and/or judicial frameworks get around to making that point to them.

(Of course technically savvy users have plenty of options, but in the real world, the mainstream case is probably going to be the devices keep being used as they were.)
 
Remember when MS said Windows 10 was the last version?
 

Similar threads