midian182

Posts: 10,162   +135
Staff member
In a nutshell: The world is trying to cut down on carbon emissions through the likes of renewable energies and other environmentally friendly initiatives. But it seems one of the best ways to reduce these planet-warming gases would be for billionaires such as Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos to stop using their private jets and yachts so much. According to a new report, members of the super-rich create the same amount of carbon emissions in 90 minutes that an average person does over their entire lifetime.

Oxfam, the British NGO that focuses on addressing global poverty, published a report examining carbon inequality. It looks at how the yachts, jets, and polluting investments of 50 of the world's richest billionaires are accelerating the climate crisis.

The results make for startling reading. Oxfam identified private jets belonging to 23 of the 50 richest people in the world and found that, on average, these billionaires each took 184 flights – spending 425 hours in the air – in 2023. That was equal to an average of 2,074 tonnes of carbon a year, or as much carbon as the average person would produce in 300 years, or 2,000 years' worth for someone in the global poorest 50%.

As bad as jets are, superyachts are worse. Oxfam found that the average annual carbon footprint of each of the 23 yachts belonging to 18 billionaires to be 5,672 tonnes, three times the emissions of their private jets. This is equivalent to 860 years of emissions for the average person.

Across a 12-month period, Jeff Bezos' two private jets spent almost 25 days in the air, releasing as much carbon as a US Amazon employee would emit in 207 years. In the same period, Elon Musk's two private jets generated 5,497 tonnes of carbon dioxide, or an average of 15 tonnes per day. That's the equivalent of 11 average people's emissions across their entire lifetimes.

It's not just the their luxury toys polluting the world. Of the 50 billionaires examined in the study, around 40% of their investments were in emissions-intensive industries like oil, mining, and shipping, with average emissions of around 2.6 million tonnes of CO2 equivalents. That's around 340 times their emissions from private jets and superyachts combined, and each billionaire's investment emissions are equivalent to almost 400,000 years of consumption emissions by the average person.

The bottom line is that Musk, Bezos, and other billionaires individually create more carbon dioxide in 90 minutes than average people do in their entire lives.

Oxfam writes that in the coming century, 1.5 million excess deaths will be caused by the consumption emissions of the richest 1% – those with incomes of at least $140,000 – between 2015 and 2019.

"This report shows that fairer taxes on extreme wealth are crucial to accelerate climate action and fight inequality – starting with private jets and superyachts," said Chiara Liguori, Oxfam's senior climate justice policy adviser. "It's clear these luxury toys aren't just symbols of excess; they're a direct threat to people and the planet."

Permalink to story:

 
We're gonna be another notch in nature's long list of creatures that survived so well they drove themselves extinct.
 
Omg, a Climate change article masquerading as a "hate rich people" article. The planets already dead, now we're just waiting for the impact of climate change to hit us. And if you don't believe in climate change, well, your insurance company does.

So drink a beer and go have fun because the world is going to look very different at the end of our lives
 
Government is the biggest polluter.
 
I am totally fine when very wealthy people are concerned that "their" planet is being hurt by humans.
I am not ok when they will do nothing to change it themselves, expecting the burden to be taken by less fortunate.
I have disdain to them when they do this. This is some sort of selfish stupidity, kinda like you are eating as x10 people, but warning others to not take a lot of food from the shelf because there might be a shortage.

The only question I have is, why do people accept these individuals as the leaders in climate fight?
Aren't they the ones that destroy it the most?
 
How about taxing mega yachts heavily.
Those that can afford them will still get them. Everyone else is unaffected.

And let's face it, noone needs a big boat of which the sole purpose is entertaining a very small group of people.
If they do it on land instead that's a lot emissions saved already.
Then again it's the rich so they'll get around it by reclassifying their yacht as a luxury cruiser or some bs. Did the article even include the emissions needed to create that much metal? Wouldn't be surprised if that's more than it would ever produce as it surely must be sitting anchored most of the time anyway.
 
Last edited:
I'm sure Musk no longer believes in climate change after his recent conversion therapy.
 
The oceans, in this world, contribute more to climate change than any other source. It's certainly NOT human beings, to the degree that these wackos running the green new scam, say they are.
 
But they are more important than the average person, so these figures must be taken in context.
 
The oceans, in this world, contribute more to climate change than any other source. It's certainly NOT human beings, to the degree that these wackos running the green new scam, say they are.

Can you expand on this comment, as maybe not so obvious to some of us

So the oceans started the warming trend around the start of the Industrial Revolution - how??
Can you point me to the science
What are the predictions ongoing for this. Will the oceans still keep doing the fastest ever warming period ever going back a long way.

What happened to start the Ocean warming .

Awaiting your take and citations

Will be great to know when the Oceans might change their collective minds and start cooling the planet
Yet another 1 in century flood in Spain

Science normally has cause and effect and you are able to make predictions, so don't leave as hanging like climate deniers always do , ****post and run knowing that their overlords the big polluters believe in none of the dis-information they give the gullible - Otherwise ergo they would be putting this forward left, right and center - maybe they lack the budget
Ie show me one study peer review from Big polluters in last couple years countering climate change.
Or are they being bullied ??
 
Hey, I've been saying this for a long time. The rich keep telling us we plebs have to cut back on our carbon footprints, but do you ever see them doing the same? Oh no, that doesn't happen. Another example of... rules for thee, but not for me.

Oh yeah, flying with us plebs isn't as lavish as flying on your own private jet. Cry me a river. *holds up middle finger*
 
"Oxfam, the British NGO that focuses on addressing global poverty"

The preferred method of addressig poverty is by creating a program (never-ending) which transfers a significant percentage of funds into the NGO's personal pockets. History shows that this is what happens, tiem and time again.
 
The hypocrisy of the super rich climate change advocates has done more to discredit the cause than anything else.
Bingo. When I start seeing them cut back, then I'll believe it. Until then, f**k the green sh*t.
 
This article was amazing!

(If I say anything else my comment will get deleted)
 

Similar threads