Posts: 566   +15
Staff
Forward-looking: Wooden houses are a fairly common sight in North American suburbs, thanks to the material's relative affordability in the continent. But they usually top out at just two or three stories. Now, thanks to a new technology called "mass timber" construction, wood can replicate the strength of steel beams and concrete – to a degree, at least.

A report by Knowable Magazine provides a rather insightful glimpse into the rise of mass timber and its benefits. The technique basically uses massive engineered wood elements instead of concrete and steel to build higher than ever before. As of 2024, mass timber buildings have climbed to almost unbelievable heights, with the 25-story Ascent tower in Milwaukee leading the pack.

The building is far from the only one in the category. The report states that there were 84 completed or under-construction mass timber buildings of eight stories or higher worldwide by 2022, with another 55 proposed. Europe dominates with 70% of these, but North America is catching up with around 20%.

As for what's driving this wooden renaissance, there are multiple reasons. For starters, mass timber could be an answer for reducing concrete and steel's massive carbon footprint, which alone makes up a whopping 15% of global emissions.

The magazine spoke to environmental scientist Diana Ürge-Vorsatz who highlighted mass timber's "double win" for emissions – both avoiding CO2 from manufacturing concrete and steel, while also locking away carbon stored in the wood itself. Her research estimated an 18-story building in British Columbia called Brock Commons saved over 2,400 tons of CO2 emissions this way.

Another proponent, a University of Toronto building scientist Ted Kesik, explained that "people actually enjoy looking at wood."

Taking a look at the "Mjøstårnet" in Norway, it's easy to imagine why. The building was certified as the world's tallest timber building at 85.4 meters (280 feet) at the time of its completion in 2019, though it's now lost the title to Milwaukee's Ascent. Both buildings are known for their warm, soothing interiors.

But what about issues like raw strength and fire resistance, which have historically held wooden buildings back? Well, mass timber uses elements like cross-laminated timber (CLT) panels that can match steel's strength pound-for-pound, thanks to layering and high-pressure gluing techniques.

Modern mass timber also passes rigorous fire testing. In the event of a fire, a protective char layer forms on the wood's surface, insulating the interior from flames long enough for evacuation and firefighter response.

Likely taking these perks into account, a 2021 update to the International Building Code gave mass timber a huge vote of confidence, allowing such constructions up to 18 stories in many places.

Of course, moisture poses risks that need careful management to prevent fungus and pests. But proponents are confident mass timber can be a sustainable solution if done right.

Image credit: Arch Daily, Think Wood

Permalink to story:

 
There are several of those houses around here that have major problems with woodpeckers.
 
"What if we had a timber skyline instead of a concrete jungle?"

Great Chicago Fire, 1871. ...Next question

A lot of people these days don't recall this stuff about history because it's not being taught or it is being actively erased to fit a narrative/agenda.

Don't forget that there was a second big fire in Chicago a few years after the 1871 fire.
 
"Of course, moisture poses risks that need careful management to prevent fungus and pests. But proponents are confident mass timber can be a sustainable solution if done right."

Maintenance will always be a cost factor especially in wet locations, high winds, etc.
 
Cue the "but cutting down all the trees" crowd in 3...2...1...
 
They don't mention the comparable design life and maintenance, which is always the first thing I look at.
 
Cue the "but cutting down all the trees" crowd in 3...2...1...
That's not quite the joke you (seem?) to think it is. We've taken so much tropical mahogany & rosewood it's under CITES protection. In fact, the fed raided Gibson's Nashville warehouse a few years back looking for those, and other protected species. Then India clamped down on their inferior strain of rosewood, stipulating that it had to be machined by then, before export.

Then we come to the California redwood. It's the only true "sequoia" ( Sequoia sempervirens), of which maybe 70% has been cut down. I doubt those massive wildfires are helping its cause.

It's true that "SPF" lumber may be sustainable. However, have you priced a 2 x 4 recently? I think a stroll through Home Depot today would be eye opening, especially if you'd have been there 20 years ago.

Cedar...,gone. Maple...gone, Red oak..,maybe, but at extravagant prices, certainly,

So, if you don't want these new wooden skyscrapers to look like, "log cabins built with square logs", (and who would?), you're gonna need aesthetically pleasing facing woods, and good luck paying for it
 
This is every fire's wet dream... if fires could get wet that is LOL xD
 
Whenever I see reports on forest fires in America with the burned out houses just squares of ash, I wonder 'why don't they build with bricks?', so it's a surprise to see it's now skyscrapers. I guess it makes it easier for nature to recycle what we leave when extinction comes, and chopping down all remaining trees to build temporary timber phaluses would be a good start to the process of recovery from the psycho ape. Since humans have rarely replaced any of the forests they've clear felled, it could only be a temporary thing, and concrete would still be made in billions of tonnes, so no big reductions of carbon.
So, how about wooden cars and trucks? Crashes would be clearable with a broom.
 
Cue the "but cutting down all the trees" crowd in 3...2...1...
Oh, so it's a 'crowd' wich cares about longer term issues from our actions is it? The old familiar 'they'. Assume you only care about games, rather than adult issues like sustainability or survival. Leave that to the adults eh?
 
Someone forgot to read these guys the story about the big bad wolf
 
Whenever I see reports on forest fires in America with the burned out houses just squares of ash, I wonder 'why don't they build with bricks?', so it's a surprise to see it's now skyscrapers. I guess it makes it easier for nature to recycle what we leave when extinction comes, and chopping down all remaining trees to build temporary timber phaluses would be a good start to the process of recovery from the psycho ape. Since humans have rarely replaced any of the forests they've clear felled, it could only be a temporary thing, and concrete would still be made in billions of tonnes, so no big reductions of carbon.
So, how about wooden cars and trucks? Crashes would be clearable with a broom.
I don't know about the USA, but in Europa, every squaremeters of land is managed, forest don't just get clear felled.
 

Similar threads