Posts: 1,371   +419
Staff
Forward-looking: By combining different wireless techniques, UK researchers achieved record-breaking data transmission speeds. The technology achieved 1 Tbps in lab experiments. Now, it only needs to prove itself in commercially viable applications.

A University College London (UCL) team achieved a nearly one terabit per second data transfer speed over a wireless connection. The world record feat opens the doors to future improvements to high-speed wireless. The researchers used a wide range of frequencies in the electromagnetic spectrum, achieving data rates thousands of times faster than typical UK download speeds over 5G networks.

The recently published study describes an ultra-wideband transmission over the air that combines electronic and photonic-assisted signal generation to send 938 Gbps over a 5-150GHz frequency range. The researchers point out that traditional wireless networks use radio frequencies operating below 6GHz, providing an average speed of 100 Megabits per second over 5G.

Radio frequencies are now congested with many disparate signals, which interfere with wireless communication speeds. The UCL team overcame this "bottleneck" by using radio and optical technologies, an unprecedented mix, providing much faster and more stable data transmission capabilities.

The researchers developed the novel solution by combining "advanced electronics," which perform better in the 5-50GHz range, and photonics technology that uses light to generate radio waves in the 50-150GHz range. They achieved a total bandwidth of more than five times higher than previous wireless transmission records (145GHz). The blistering speed is 9,380 times faster than the best average 5G network speeds in the UK. The ultra-wide transmission method transferred a two-hour UltraHD movie (14GB) in just 0.12 seconds. That amount of data takes 19 minutes over a 100 Mbps 5G connection.

"Current wireless communication systems are struggling to keep up with the increasing demand for high-speed data access, with capacity in the last few meters between the user and the fiber optic network holding us back," said Zhixin Liu, lead author of the UCL study.

So far, the team has only demonstrated the new technology in a lab under ideal conditions. However, they have already begun working on a prototype device to test it in commercial environments. Optimistically, a proper implementation of the novel transmission method could be ready for implementation in commercial equipment within three to five years.

The UCL team thinks its new technology could significantly improve wireless connections, closing the gap between ultra-fast fiber optic cables and "last-mile" devices such as smartphones or Wi-Fi clients. Mobile networks could benefit the most, providing faster and more stable connectivity to densely populated areas over 5G and even 6G services.

Permalink to story:

 
At the cost of exponentially increasing various types of cancer. A heat map of radiation from wireless networks reveals that the highest rates of cancer and other diseases linked to genetic degradation are concentrated in the areas of greatest exposure.
 
At the cost of exponentially increasing various types of cancer. A heat map of radiation from wireless networks reveals that the highest rates of cancer and other diseases linked to genetic degradation are concentrated in the areas of greatest exposure.
Riiiight, this energy that is at frequencies way below ionising, surely its would give us so many cancers......
What if they increase it to like...400 thz, that would be so horrible! (Except for the fact that is the frequency of red light, which we get from the sky every second and we haven't all immediately got cancer)

Also, as per usual correlation is not causation, otherwise we would be saying higher ice cream sales must cause summer shark attacks...
 
Riiiight, this energy that is at frequencies way below ionising, surely its would give us so many cancers......
What if they increase it to like...400 thz, that would be so horrible! (Except for the fact that is the frequency of red light, which we get from the sky every second and we haven't all immediately got cancer)

Also, as per usual correlation is not causation, otherwise we would be saying higher ice cream sales must cause summer shark attacks...
Yes, It does. if you live in a radiation hotspot, there is nothing you can do about all that energy hitting you every day.


"RF fields do not ionise cell genome or damage cells and tissues in any direct way, but research indicates that they affect living organisms via thermal effects (tissue heating) and non-thermal effects such as vibration and rotation of molecules (especially those that have an asymmetric charge or that are polar in structure), oxidative stress, genetic damage, or altered cell membrane permeability" -> https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9287836/


The artificial light we are exposed to causes cancer, as it reduces melatonin levels, and as studies show, increases the potential risk of cancer, especially breast cancer. But please remain blissfully ignorant. https://academic.oup.com/eurpub/article/33/Supplement_2/ckad160.571/7328284
 

Sorry hold up, is that map trying to say the UK has good signal? Or sorry, “high RF fields”?

Because if that’s the case, that might be the biggest waste of a heat map I’ve ever seen, Japan, Portugal, Denmark, all places I’ve been to with substantially better wireless networks, and they all show much lower on the heat map.
 
Sorry hold up, is that map trying to say the UK has good signal? Or sorry, “high RF fields”?

Because if that’s the case, that might be the biggest waste of a heat map I’ve ever seen, Japan, Portugal, Denmark, all places I’ve been to with substantially better wireless networks, and they all show much lower on the heat map.
This is the density/quantity of wireless signals, not the quality or strength. Denmark is a small country; its population density is approximately 144 inhabitants per square kilometer. The total population of the country is around 5.8 million people, spread over an area of about 40,000 km².

New York City specifically has approximately 10,900 inhabitants per square kilometer. The total population of the city's around 8.5 million people, squeezing into an area of about 783 km².
 
Riiiight, this energy that is at frequencies way below ionising, surely its would give us so many cancers......
What if they increase it to like...400 thz, that would be so horrible! (Except for the fact that is the frequency of red light, which we get from the sky every second and we haven't all immediately got cancer)

Also, as per usual correlation is not causation, otherwise we would be saying higher ice cream sales must cause summer shark attacks...

How do you know it isn't? Cancer has to be "discovered" and in general that happens very slowly when somebody spots a small bump, lump or tumor on their body or when they go to the doctor for a yearly physical.
You can be slowly, insidiously, perniciously developing cancer over a number of years. It doesn't just jump out from behind a moving vehicle and scream "BOO! Hahahaha, I got You!"

We need to take these possibilities into consideration.

If by "the red sky" you mean exposure to radiation from sunshine, then yes, that can cause cancer over a period of time. But it does *not* happen "immediately". So, I think we can do away with that theory. In my honest opinion, if you're getting cancer from the sun, then you're not doing something right in your diet.
 
Last edited:
I'll be curious to see how far these high frequency signals can travel in the real world, especially given the reduced ability of higher frequencies to penetrate objects.
 

Similar threads