Posts: 509   +12
Staff
WTF?! Having some gadget crap out after the warranty expires is just an annoyance for most of us. But in the case of Doug Straight, who was paralyzed from the waist down after a horse racing accident, the device in question was essential to his quality of life. After the former jockey's $100,000 ReWalk exoskeleton stopped working due to a tiny component failure, he could no longer walk because the company refused repairs.

The high-tech suit, made by a company called Lifeward, allowed Straight to walk again with physical therapy. It even helped increase his bone density and treat some other symptoms caused by the injury. Unfortunately, after racking up over 371,000 steps, the suit suddenly quit on him thanks to a loose wire connection on the watch that acted as the control interface.

This malfunction could have been fixed for basically pocket change. All Lifeward had to do was resolder that little wire back onto the watch's battery. But shockingly, the company flat-out refused, telling Straight that his 10-year-old exoskeleton was too ancient for them to service anymore despite its six-figure cost when new.

"The reasons why it has stopped is a pathetic excuse for a bad company to try and make more money," Straight posted on Facebook on September 16. "The reason it stopped is because of a battery in the watch I wear to operate the machine. I called thinking it was no big deal, yet I was told they stopped working on any machine that was 5 years or older."

Unfortunately, Straight's struggles represent a bigger issue plaguing the meditech industry and consumer electronics in general. For instance, back in 2022, hundreds of people lost vision when startup Second Sight stopped supporting its Argus II bionic eye implants to focus on brain implants instead.

Manufacturers also go out of their way to make it difficult or impossible for anyone but their own overpriced technicians to make repairs. As 404 Media notes, they even lobby against "right to repair" laws and lean on people who share DIY fixes.

The lobbying works because they can make a stronger case for themselves by claiming independent repairs could create safety risks. That may be true, but by forcing pricey replacements over affordable fixes, such companies are also able to increase profits.

"This is the dystopian nightmare that we've kind of entered in, where the manufacturer perspective on products is that their responsibility completely ends when it hands it over to a customer," Nathan Proctor, head of citizen rights group US PIRG's right to repair project, told 404 Media.

Straight did ultimately get his robotic legs repaired, but only after raising a ruckus on social media and getting local TV to cover his struggle. Of course, not every person with disabilities can pull this off, so hopefully, this fight helps shine a light on the need for right-to-repair reform.

Permalink to story:

 
It's hard to believe that some companies make such dumb decisions, resulting only in negative marketing...
 
Total fail all around. Company should have just fixed it but this guy really couldn't just get it fixed himself for such a little amount of money?

If it's just $20, have the guy send me his Venmo and I'll help him out.
 
This should be a $10 Billion dollar lawsuit. Not that he will get it all, but it will cost the company considerably on it's liability insurance coverage and the chap should get more than a few million dollars out of the deal .....
 
The Ferengi would be proud!
 
A real company would have accepted the repair and done it for free for the publicity...

They would have made additional sales with the publicity stun.
 
"The lobbying works because they can make a stronger case for themselves by claiming independent repairs could create safety risks. That may be true, but by forcing pricey replacements over affordable fixes, such companies are also able to increase profits."

aah safety risk? we all know the orginal manufactoer is the root of all safety issues 99.999999% of the time, exploding batteries, bendgate, batterygate, etc
 
Something isn't clear to me. It sounds like a relatively simple watch repair rather than the exoskeleton itself. Unless I read it wrong, why can't he go to a watch repair person?
 
Note to all those who blame the “liberal media” for all of their problems, this man was only able to get this repair in place after TV news stations covered the story.
 
Fixing his unit was not going to maximize shareholder value.
 
What this company did was bad. That been said, if the device is not under warranty and the company refuses to service it, then the owner has the right to repair it or hire anyone he wants to repair it right?
 
Total fail all around. Company should have just fixed it but this guy really couldn't just get it fixed himself for such a little amount of money?

If it's just $20, have the guy send me his Venmo and I'll help him out.
I think it's more that it would have cost the company an estimated $20 of work to do it, but instead they just outright refused to do it at all. Not that he wouldn't/couldn't pay $20 to have it done.
 
Once you know what is actually broken you can say it was a $20 repair. But it could have been some part that was out of production/stock. What I do not understand is how did it only do 371.000 steps in 10 years. That is about 101 steps per day. It hardly enables the wearer to do anything.
 
Once you know what is actually broken you can say it was a $20 repair. But it could have been some part that was out of production/stock. What I do not understand is how did it only do 371.000 steps in 10 years. That is about 101 steps per day. It hardly enables the wearer to do anything.
101 Steps a day is a lot more than the 0 he had before.
 
Greed, greed never changes - Real world Fallout ;p
 
Saw this awhile back on the Louis Rossmann YT channel. he does good work, with some nice profanity, seems a modern Ralph Nader - who without checking had a lot of hate thrown his way by mega corps lapdogs in the 70s
 
With all the insane liabilities and red tape medical companies face, it's hardly surprising that the company refused to touch a 10 year old medical prosthetic. But the sheep will still accuse the company that made this device in the first place of "greed". You just have to love the entitlement here.

Here's the funny thing. "Greed" creates market opportunities. Putting aside the number of 3rd parties interested in earning a buck by solving this patient's new problem, this prosthetic probably didn't even exist 20-30 years ago until a company decided to spend multiple 10s or 100s of millions or even billions of dollars on medical R&D. Couple the high startup costs with the fact that this is a low-volume product that also has to be custom-made and tailored to the each user, no sh!t it's gonna cost six figures. Heck, 100k is starting to sound like a bargain all things considered, and when taking into account what it had endured over the course of a decade.

But if you still aren't convinced, then, by all means, enter the market and do it better!
 

Similar threads