Posts: 1,339   +402
Staff
These Broadcom Delights: AT&T recently filed a lawsuit against Broadcom over its VMware licensing agreement, asserting that it is entitled to two more years of guaranteed support. According to redacted emails presented as evidence, Broadcom, led by CEO Hock Tan, demanded a substantial price increase to maintain the agreement.

AT&T is resorting to legal action in an effort to compel Broadcom to comply with the service agreement it signed for using VMware products. The technology company, now functioning more like a private equity fund, has made it clear that it aims to transition its recently acquired virtualization products into a subscription-only model. This new approach would require large companies to spend significantly more to access premium cloud-based tools and technology.

While AT&T could have been an ideal partner in Broadcom's vision for VMware's future, the telecom giant was presented with financial terms that were impossible to accept. In a redacted email, seemingly addressed to Broadcom CEO Hock Tan, AT&T executive Susan Johnson remarked that their "10-plus-year" strategic partnership was likely to end on a disappointing note.

The latest offer AT&T received for a new five-year deal reportedly included an astronomical +1,050% annual price increase. Johnson described the proposed hike as "extreme and certainly not how we expect strategic partners to engage in business with AT&T." She further confirmed that AT&T planned to pursue a "legal strategy" against Broadcom, accusing the company of attempting to prevent AT&T from exercising its right to two more years of support beyond September 9, 2024.

"We have reviewed our licensing agreement. We believe we both have enough licenses to cover our current usage and that it does legally protect us to preclude Broadcom from discontinuing contractually agreed upon support," the email continued.

Johnson also noted that AT&T is organizing a full migration away from VMware's virtualization technology – an operation expected to cost between $40 million and $50 million. However, she emphasized that this investment would provide a "very quick" payback, given the extreme price hike proposed by Broadcom.

According to Johnson, Broadcom left AT&T with no reasonable alternative, though AT&T's management remained open to discussions with Tan's team. AT&T's vice president of global technology planning, Gordon Mansfield, explained that replacing the entire VMware stack would likely require substantial investment and involve a great deal of costly, time-consuming engineering work.

VMware software is deeply integrated into products purchased by AT&T from its vendors, and it remains essential for keeping the company's network running. AT&T cannot unilaterally replace VMware products without collaborating with these vendors, although a complete replacement has been under investigation since December 2023.

To complicate matters further, Mansfield added that Broadcom is now actively preventing some vendors from selling certain VMware products to AT&T.

Permalink to story:

 
I'm surprised we haven't learned of a joint project to recreate the VMware software. There's probably a lot of companies in AT&T's position, and it'd make sense for them to pitch in say a few million dollars each to a shared effort vs. all have to go it alone.

Whether or not that happens, it seems likely that one or more of the entities that pay say $50 million to recreate it are going to seek to recover that expense by licensing their new alternative.

This does not seem like a rosy future for VMWare but maybe they don't care about the "far future". For everyone else, I'd recommend a pricing strategy that easily falls under the "it'd cost less to do it ourselves" ceiling.
 
As much as I hate ATT, this is absurd. Broadcom engraved themselves into the fundamentals of how their business operates and then squeeze after 8 years.

I used to love VMware and it is very much a goldstandard for what it does, but someone needs to make an alternative product that is cheaper or even free.

Greed is killing our economy to the point that even corporations can't afford to pay each other.
 
Veeam now has Proxmox compatibility.
Enjoy it while you can, Broadcom.
 
As much as I hate ATT, this is absurd. Broadcom engraved themselves into the fundamentals of how their business operates and then squeeze after 8 years.

I used to love VMware and it is very much a goldstandard for what it does, but someone needs to make an alternative product that is cheaper or even free.

Greed is killing our economy to the point that even corporations can't afford to pay each other.


On the contrary, it is this sort of “greed” which creates opportunities for competitors to enter and undercut the existing competition.
 
Broadcom is killing VMWare through absurd prices. Soon they will have no clients left over this.

 
I'm I correct to say one greedy company ripping off another greedy company?
 
Broadcom only wants to support Enterprises, it seems? They are very clearly exploiting their existing Enterprise customers and abandoning SMB and under.
 
If you have an IT company and want to garantuee that you're going to get exploited hard, buy heavily into the VMWare and Oracle ecosystems.

At least VMWare offers things that are hard to find a replacement for.
 

Similar threads