Posts: 1,321   +391
Staff
WTF?! Kaspersky Lab has taken an unexpected stance over its current customers in the US after the Biden Administration banned its software. The Russian company is replacing its antivirus software in the US with a somewhat shady alternative called UltraAV – a security product no one in the industry knows anything about.

Kaspersky is handing the computer security of US customers to UltraAV, an "alternative" product with unknown anti-malware capabilities. The move comes after US authorities banned its software, forcing it out of the US market. However, switching to a completely different security tool is a development no one anticipated.

While Kaspersky will cease all its US operations by September 30, an unspecified amount of US customers have already experienced the change to UltraAV. The US-based company claims to offer "industry-leading protection" against all types of security threats and can connect up to 20 devices for family-wide anti-malware protection.

The company that owns the UltraAV brand, Pango, has a working relationship with Kaspersky, and Pango was recently acquired by another company named Aura. Kaspersky previously licensed one of its products to Pango, but no Russian code will likely be part of UltraAV's replacement solution for Kaspersky's anti-malware tools.

The company told The Register that it based its antivirus engine on an entirely different product made by Max Secure Software, an India-based security firm. The engine's driving force is Dr. Zulfikar Ramzan, an Aura employee with a PhD in computer science from MIT. Ramzan worked for six years at RSA as Chief Technology Officer (CTO).

However, the main issue with UltraAV is that industry experts have no relevant knowledge about the company or its supposedly effective anti-malware technology.

"We've a very close knit community in the AV business, so having a complete unknown is really unusual," an anonymous source revealed.

UltraAV is also deserting trade organizations like the Anti-Malware Testing Standards Organization (AMTSO). Security software manufacturers traditionally submit their code to third-party testers for an independent assessment. However, no one in the industry has seen UltraAV's software yet.

According to partial early tests by different antivirus labs, the "new" antivirus leaves room for improvement in both protection capabilities and usability. However, Pango assures consumers that it has scheduled a third-party test for the end of the year. Baffled US Kaspersky customers will now have to choose between sticking with the unknown UltraAV antivirus or replacing it with a different, more proven product.

Permalink to story:

 
The US paranoia of seeing spies everywhere hurts the consumer and economy. But prejudice never shows much reason.
 
Why did they not just tell U.S customers as of the 30th of September Kasperski AV will no longer work and you will need to find a replacement AV suite thereby giving customers a chance to choose for themselves instead of shoveling some other AV suite that no one has heard of.
Personally I've not had any problems with MS's Windows Defender AV
 
The US paranoia of seeing spies everywhere hurts the consumer and economy. But prejudice never shows much reason.
You must be in denial or an enemy of the state otherwise you would know by now that Kaspersky is as much of a Russian spy tool as TikTok is for China.

But once again, I'm not asking you to admit it.
 
The US paranoia of seeing spies everywhere hurts the consumer and economy. But prejudice never shows much reason.

In this particular case there is no paranoia. Kaspersky has been untrustworthy for years.
 
In this particular case there is no paranoia. Kaspersky has been untrustworthy for years.

Untrustworthy, based on what? A lot of rumors, started by the US? Never any real evidence. They just wanted no security products on the shelf from Russia, and now they got it. They US policy is always the same, for anything they don't like, they start by throwing feces at it for some time, until the stench rises, and then they ban it, no evidence needed, just damaged reputation, which they caused themselves.
 
Last edited:
In this particular case there is no paranoia. Kaspersky has been untrustworthy for years.
Has it? When you do a search, Kaspersky regularly ranks as one of the better AV’s out there. From third party testing and industry insiders.

The only untrustworthy part is the fact it’s a Russian company from what I can tell, they even went to some length to try and distance themselves from the Kremlin by moving their headquarters and server locations.
 
You must be in denial or an enemy of the state otherwise you would know by now that Kaspersky is as much of a Russian spy tool as TikTok is for China.

But once again, I'm not asking you to admit it.

Look up "eyes nations".
 
Kaspersky was heavy on any machine you install it on. Whatever that security suit was doing it wasn't like anything on the market. As AV it was next to useless but as a headache a huge success.

Regarding that replacement of theirs. Indian software excellent if you in adventure mode testing fresh approaches and unorthodox solutions but if you need something stable and reliable may be it's not the brightest of ideas to go with.
 

Similar threads