Posts: 176   +4
Staff
In a nutshell: In the short term, the EU's Radio Equipment Directive will make two out of five used smartphones in the region obsolete because they do not have USB-C chargers. For the long term, the new regulation could lead to innovation in wireless charging technologies and new business models that focus on retrofitting older devices with USB-C ports. The directive could also prompt manufacturers to explore more sustainable materials to reduce e-waste.

The EU's Radio Equipment Directive, set to take effect at the end of this year, will require all mobile devices to support USB-C charging. The legislation aims to reduce e-waste by standardizing chargers, but its practical impact will be to make eight million used smartphones, representing $2.22 billion in potential sales, effectively obsolete in the region.

The impact will be far-reaching, affecting both primary and secondary smartphone markets. CCS Insights estimates that 60 percent of secondhand smartphones will not support USB-C when the directive is implemented.

"The USB-C mandate will strain the still-emerging circular industry, which has already seen several companies cease trading this year because of tough market conditions," Simon Bryant, Vice President of Research at CCS Insight told The Register. "It also risks pushing trading into unregulated channels and is likely to promote parallel imports bypassing EU customs."

The EU is a major importer of used phones, primarily from the US, Japan, and Singapore. The ban applies to imported models, but used phones with non-compliant ports can still be sold within member states.

The directive has been under development for years, with discussions about standardizing chargers launching in 2011. In 2014, MicroUSB was initially approved as the connector design of choice. The common charging standard was proposed in January 2020 and passed with 582 votes to 40.

Apple initially opposed the regulation, citing concerns about stifling innovation, but later did an about-face and confirmed it was switching to USB-C for the iPhone 15 line-up a year ago. Cupertino is a major force in the global secondhand smartphone market, comprising 62 percent of overall volumes, or 17 million iPhones, while Samsung has a 20 percent market share. Last year, 117 million secondhand phones were shipped worldwide, and CCS Insights expects that this year the numbers will be even greater.

Now, the release of the iPhone 16 could well flood the market with pre-USB-C models – assuming Apple Intelligence will be a big enough draw to convince consumers to ditch their existing devices and buy the latest Apple offering.

On the other hand, consumers are keeping their older phones longer, and when they do trade up, many are opting for second-hand models. Half of consumers polled in a Vodafone-backed survey earlier this year said they are contemplating buying a refurbished smartphone instead of a brand-new handset, citing the lower purchase price and environmental concerns as the main reasons.

E-waste is a major issue for the EU, which estimates that old chargers contributed to 51,000 metric tons of electronic waste a decade ago, reduced to 11,000 tons in recent years. The Radio Equipment Directive was crafted in part to reduce end-of-life electronics, but it may paradoxically lead to an increase in discarded devices in the short term.

Permalink to story:

 
I don't see how this makes non-USB-C phones obsolete????
People can still buy these phones second-hand and chargers for them? Nothing changes for old phones at all.
It just mandates that all new phones in the future use USB-C - which sounds very sensible?
 
This article is conflating the existing regulation, that is only on new phones, with a proposed new regulation for used phones that is a stupid extension of a sensible law.
 
USB-C may be labelled Universal, but it is not universally convenient. That is why Apple moved from MagSafe to USB-C, and then back to MagSafe, because it is way better as a power cable, and not only that. It makes a much better cable when A) You can connect without having to see with your eyes where the port is, and B) It can always detach safely when pulled away. A USB-C cannot do either of those.

 
I don't follow the logic of this article, it seems to imply that the EU will ban second hand phones and accessories if they are not USB-C, but as we continue reading, the article states that the rule does not affect second hand phones and that they will not be affected. Where is the extra e-waste coming from ?

I've read it twice and maybe it's something I did not get, but I fail to see the connexion the article tries to make with this regulation and the extra amount of e-waste from second hand market.
 
but used phones with non-compliant ports can still be sold within member states.

So what is article even about?
 
"Research at CCS Insight"
Is this some Russian propaganda outlet or an Apple lobby group?

Because they surely can't be as stupid as to really believe (or know for that matter) that the new EU regulation will not apply only to NEWLY SOLD "mobile devices", and that somehow it will be illegal to use "mobile devices" THAT HAVE BEEN ALREADY SOLD TO CUSTOMERS and in use, just because they don't have USB-C charging, can they?

And don't even get me started about how USB-C charging for phones IS ALREADY MANDATORY in the EU, and phones (save for Apple's) HAVE BEEN ALREADY DE FACTO USING USB-C for years, so, this will only affect other kind of "mobile devices", not phones.
 
I don't follow the logic of this article, it seems to imply that the EU will ban second hand phones and accessories if they are not USB-C, but as we continue reading, the article states that the rule does not affect second hand phones and that they will not be affected. Where is the extra e-waste coming from ?

I've read it twice and maybe it's something I did not get, but I fail to see the connexion the article tries to make with this regulation and the extra amount of e-waste from second hand market.
because there is now a separate bill being proposed to ban non usb c from the second hand market.

But you know, governments and regulations are so wonderful and benevolent and all that….
 
USB-C may be labelled Universal, but it is not universally convenient. That is why Apple moved from MagSafe to USB-C, and then back to MagSafe, because it is way better as a power cable, and not only that. It makes a much better cable when A) You can connect without having to see with your eyes where the port is, and B) It can always detach safely when pulled away. A USB-C cannot do either of those.

I've seen multiple Apple power charging cords fall apart and need replacing in the past 5 years at my house (wife's laptop, ipad, kid's ipads) whereas I've been using the same usb-c power cable and adapter for the past 11 years with two different phones without any issues.

Sure, it's all personal experiences, but from what I've experienced the Apple cables are crap.

As for the story it doesn't make any sense. None of these devices will automatically just end up in the trash because the USB-C becomes the main charging port for devices. Anyone with devices and charging cables/adaptors for other types will still be fully functional and if you need a non-USB-C cable you can always purchase one online.....they won't magically vanish from the face of the Earth once USB-C becomes the norm.
 
I got more confused by reading this article
this is nothing new, I welcome my new EU charging overlords, USB-C to rule them all
if people need a new charger, they can buy a USB-C charger with a USB-C to Micro Cable
 
Article is confusing but I'm taking from it that EU is making it illegal for vendors to sell older used and/or refurbished phones that don't have USB-C, and that these phones would otherwise be a significant portion of total phone sales.

If that's true it sounds like a dumb law to me. The phones were already manufactured. They already exist. Their much lower price is important to a lot of people.
 
The only things I can gather from this article is that the author doesn't know how to write or is dumb. That and the editor didn't do their job. 100 IQ tip: If context hasn't already been established then you need to give that before you start making additional claims.
 
Just buy a usb-c to...adapter to interface to your older devices. Confusing article as the title implies used phones cannot be bought, but later states that some Member States can sell older non-usb-c phones.
 
Last edited:
Maybe ChatGPT wrote this article, as it literally makes no sense as others have pointed out. I read but I cannot comprehend
 

Similar threads