Posts: 479   +2
Staff
TL;DR: Chinese tech company TCL is under the microscope following allegations from a South Korean quantum dot film manufacturer that some models of its QLED TV lineup do not contain quantum dot technology. The company denied the claims, citing results from a different test confirming that its QLED TVs use quantum-dot tech.

South Korean news site ET News notes that testing by two independent certification agencies, SGS and Intertek, found that the TCL C755, C655, and C655 Pro QLED TV models do not contain any signs of the elements indium and cadmium, which are essential to the creation of quantum dot nanocrystals. Hansol Chemical, which supplies quantum dot films to Samsung and other QLED TV manufacturers, commissioned the tests.

The television manufacturer denied the false advertising allegations, claiming all its quantum dot TVs contain actual quantum dot films.

"The QD content may vary depending on the supplier, but it definitely contains cadmium," the company explained.

The TLC press release also questioned Hansol's testing methodology, claiming it wasn't accurate enough to detect the exact amount of cadmium in the panels.

The company provided findings from a different test commissioned by one of its quantum dot film suppliers, also conducted by SGS, one of the agencies employed by Hansol. Its analysis reportedly found trace amounts of cadmium, while a spectrogram conducted on the QD film is also said to have confirmed the presence of quantum dots.

However, there is a critical difference between the two tests and the materials used to detect the presence of cadmium. Hansol's original analysis used actual TCL TV panels. The report TCL quoted examined QD films from its suppliers. It's unclear whether the films used in the models in question are from the same supplier as the ones TCL had tested.

After the ET News report broke in the west, TCL released a statement to Tom's Guide, claiming it doesn't sell any of the models in question in the US.

Quantum dot LED, or QLED, is a relatively new technology that offers enhanced color reproduction and superior picture quality. Quantum dots are manufactured nanocrystals that produce different colors depending on the particle size. They can emit precise colors because particle sizes adjust at quantum-level velocities, producing accurate and efficient light emission.

Permalink to story:

 
Another one is companies here advertise their sh***y TVs as GLOLED with emphasis on letters OLED.
 
different colors depending on the particle size. They can emit precise colors because particle sizes adjust at quantum-level velocities, producing accurate and efficient light emission.
How many languages did this get translated to before they translated it to English? That's not how quantum dots work.
 
It seems they just wanted to make some extra cash selling these among their real qled tvs.
And the fact that they did not bring them to the US shows that they were aware they could have problems
with the law.
The article does not say anything about the price. Were they perhaps a bit cheaper models?
 
How many languages did this get translated to before they translated it to English? That's not how quantum dots work.
Also, what is a quantum level velocity that changes partcle size? That's sad.
 
Also, what is a quantum level velocity that changes partcle size? That's sad.
I had to Google how quantum dots worked after reading this to make sure I wasn't having a stroke. I'm not exaggerating, either. So few times in my life have I seen such word gibberish that I thought something might be going wrong up there. I do have a neurological disease so it wouldn't be unreasonable to think this might be it. So, yes, I mean it literally. That was so poorly written I thought that I was having a stroke when I read that.
 
"TCL released a statement to Tom's Guide, claiming it doesn't sell any of the models in question in the US."

Oh, then it's fine I guess? lol...
 
QLED was a term Samsung made up for their LCDs with mini-led backlights to confuse customers back when LG had OLED and Samsung had nothing to compete. Why is TCL now the one getting blowback?!
 

Similar threads