What a downfall: Back in the late 90s, Intel and Microsoft were the first major tech players to join the elite Dow Jones Industrial Average club. It was the heyday of the PC revolution that these two giants had largely ushered in. But the tides have turned over the last couple of decades. While Microsoft has soared to become the world's second-biggest company thanks to its booming cloud and AI businesses, Intel has been struggling.

The chipmaker's market cap has now dipped below $100 billion for the first time since its peak in 2000. Its stock has plummeted nearly 60% this year alone, making it the worst performer among the 30 Dow components that make up the DJIA. The company also reported a $1.6 billion loss for the second quarter, causing shares to sink even further to their current $20 level.

With such a low stock price and a mere 0.32% weighted influence in the DJIA, analysts in a Reuters report are sounding the alarm that Intel's days in the index could be numbered.

The Dow's selection committee keeps a close eye on the spread between its highest and lowest-priced components. When that gap exceeds 10x, they've historically given the bottom dweller the boot. Right now, healthcare behemoth UnitedHealth Group's lofty $580 share price is a whopping 29 times more expensive than Intel's.

A few key missteps have contributed to this downfall, starting with the fact it failed to ride the AI wave. The company has also been bleeding market share in its bread-and-butter data center CPU business, and its massive investments in new manufacturing capacity look questionable given the cloudy prospects for its foundry efforts. In fact, an upcoming $32 billion factory in Germany, which is already facing delays, could be outright canceled.

In an attempt to stop the bleeding, Intel has resorted to laying off 15% of its workforce and suspending its dividend payouts. The company is also considering the separation of its business divisions into independent entities.

If Intel does get kicked out of the Dow, the report says two leading candidates to replace the company are semiconductor rivals Nvidia and Texas Instruments.

Nvidia has had an excellent year (up until yesterday), with its stock rocketing 160% higher as the AI boom turbo-charged demand for its graphics processors. However, its extreme volatility could give the Dow's conservative selection committee some pause. Texas Instruments might therefore be the safer choice. Known for its steady performance and major US manufacturing footprint, it has delivered a relatively calm 20% stock gain this year.

Permalink to story:

Intel's poor stock performance could lead to its removal from the Dow Jones

Intels failures over the years:
* Not getting a foothold in the mobile market and withdrawing from it, giving ARM free reign (surely that won't bite them in the ***)
* Sitting on their hands releasing quad core after quad core for years giving AMD the opportunity to rise (Ryzen) up.
* Failing on the fab front where they had always been ahead, TSMC caught up and eventually pulled ahead.
* Losing Apple as a customer who switches over to an ARM design (whoops, should have held on to that mobile market). It's not about the market share - it's about sending a message. The message is that Intel fell too far behind and some figured they could do better themselves (and they did, which is real bad for the publics opinion on intel)
* Missing the boat on AI. Whilst NVIDIA is making boat loads of money Intel is just fighting for scraps.
* Pushing 13th and 14th Gen too far to compete with AMD. The fallout from that hurt the publics opinion once again but far worse... It's costing them datacenter customers. Those who hadn't switched over to AMD yet are doing so now. These are the super loyal customers that never really want to switch over and unless. AMD screws up in similar fashion those customers are lost forever (and that is the fast margins market).


Intel is definitely in hot water.I wouldn't be surprised if they'll end up having to split off the fabs. The US government won't be willing to lose that branch so it's basically safe from going completely under. An endless supply of US tax payer money will keep the fabs afloat. The other branch however isn't quite as vital on the world stage. The other x86 player is American as well after all, Qualcomm AMD Apple are US based as well.

I have a strong feeling the US government will prop Intel up because they want more chip making to be onshored. But this will be a very costly bailout because foundries are very costly to maintain and very dependent on a healthy demand pipeline to keep it funded.