Posts: 397   +5
Staff
What just happened? Hyundai has essentially confirmed that the N Vision 74 concept is headed for production. The news slipped out during the company's 2024 CEO Investor Day presentation outlining its roadmap for expanding hybrid offerings, mobility solutions, and Genesis models. But buried in a slide detailing 21 upcoming Hyundai EVs by 2030 was a clear shoutout to the stunning N Vision 74.

No official statements were made about the vehicle, but the slide mentioned it specifically under future "high-performance EVs." Reading between the lines, something derived from that wildly popular concept seems likely to hit roads in the next few years. But then again, it's best to take the news with a pinch of salt since the presentation barely gave out any further details.

For now, we can only speculate on what a production version might look like performance-wise. The original concept rocked a monstrous 671 horsepower from a hydrogen fuel cell and dual electric motors. But with limited infrastructure for hydrogen cars, the smart money is on Hyundai ditching that setup for a more conventional electric powertrain.

A report by ETNews from December claimed Hyundai could make an ultra-limited run of just 100 production N Vision 74s, with 70 being road-legal and 30 prepped for racing. If that pans out, they might be able to get away with keeping the hydrogen tech without too much hassle. The report also pointed to an 800 hp rating from the production car's hydrogen/electric hybrid system.

Regardless of the final output numbers, all signs point toward this thing being a certified speed demon whenever it arrives.

Another report by The Korean Car Blog citing inside sources said R&D is already underway at Hyundai's Namyang tech center, with a potential 2026 production start date circled.

As for other details about the original concept, it used a heavily modified Kia Stinger platform, packing a 62.4 kWh battery and an 85 kW hydrogen fuel cell powering a pair of 335 hp motors at the rear wheels. Apparently, Hyundai's mainstream E-GMP EV platform wasn't a fit for the low-slung, performance-oriented proportions they were chasing.

Hyundai has been obsessed with 80s-style designs in recent years. The N Vision 74 concept was first unveiled at Hyundai's N Day 2022 event. Its looks went viral for the resemblance to Back to the Future's iconic DeLorean DMC-12 and because of the recent surge in interest in retro-futuristic designs, likely due to the massive popularity of Cyberpunk 2077. In fact, the car can be driven on the streets of Night City with a mod.

Another retro model widely talked about for similar reasons was the arguably even cooler-looking Hyundai Heritage Series Grandeur, which was revived as a concept by the company in 2021 with an all-electric powertrain. Here's hoping that goes into production, too.

Permalink to story:

Hyundai's striking cyberpunk concept car may soon enter production

 
Know what, I'm okay with this. Too many EVs want to look like "the future" or, basically, they all look the same because they're trying to be hyper aerodynamic.

Just make an EV that's "just a car". I see too many EVs that look weird or try to do too much because "electric". Just let it be a car, people don't want to drive an iPad. I'm okay with the cyber truck and this because they're trying to have fun, most EVs are sterile with their styling. I would describe most EV styling as "beige" if that makes any sense to the 90s kids.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 0dium, yesnt and Plutoisaplanet
I may disagree with hundai on a lot, but I will give them this: their designers put out a LOT of work and coporate is not afraid to try new looks and concepts.

I actually really like the look. This is a 90s PS1 design done right (take notes elon).
 
  • Like
Reactions: yesnt and Plutoisaplanet
By 2030, we will be able to auto-generate our own favourite car and order it for 3d-printing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wiyosaya and yRaz
This is a toy for rich people.
 
I bet its over $100K US.
 
Pre 2k aesthetic, yes please.
 
I approve.
 
Looks like 3D fan made
 
Wow DeLorean called and want's their IP back. How typically South Korean.
 
"The report also pointed to an 800 hp rating from the production car's hydrogen/electric hybrid system." Why would you have a hydrogen electric hybrid system? Why not just pure electric which can easily provide enough power.

Using a standard dual motor chassis should provide enough power so it's just a question of adding the bodywork, interior and software. Perhaps manufacturers should test their designs on games like 2077 and GTA to see which vehicles customers want to drive before looking into manufacturing.

yRaz said:
they all look the same because they're trying to be hyper aerodynamic....Just make an EV that's "just a car". I see too many EVs that look weird or try to do too much because "electric".
Click to expand...
People say they want range. The only way you can get range is by adding huge batteries or making the vehicle as efficient as possible. Maybe I'm just too easy to please but a current Tesla model 3 standard range offers me more than enough range and power etc. I even like the looks.
 
mbk34 said:
"The report also pointed to an 800 hp rating from the production car's hydrogen/electric hybrid system." Why would you have a hydrogen electric hybrid system? Why not just pure electric which can easily provide enough power...People say they want range. The only way you can get range is by adding huge batteries or making the vehicle as efficient as possible.
Click to expand...
It's as if you answered your own question without realizing it. Refueling with hydrogen is much faster than recharging batteries. I'm assuming the hybrid system uses hydrogen fuel cells to generate power to charge the batteries, which would be the best of both worlds for people who don't have parking where they can install a charger. Of course, that's only going to work for people who have hydrogen fuel stations in their area. At least California has the car scene that will work perfectly for this concept.
 
Bobbydpue said:
It's as if you answered your own question without realizing it. Refueling with hydrogen is much faster than recharging batteries. I'm assuming the hybrid system uses hydrogen fuel cells to generate power to charge the batteries, which would be the best of both worlds for people who don't have parking where they can install a charger. Of course, that's only going to work for people who have hydrogen fuel stations in their area. At least California has the car scene that will work perfectly for this concept.
Click to expand...
I've never seen a hydrogen refuelling station but then I don't live in California and that's why the idea of increasing your range using hydrogen isn't ever going to work. You'd just do better waiting a year or two for faster charging batteries or just accept that current vehicles really are close to perfect for most people. A Tesla 3 LR has a range of 390 miles and charges from 20% to 80% in 24 minutes. 0-60 times are also around 4 seconds. Do you really need to add hydrogen fuel cells?
 
mbk34 said:
I've never seen a hydrogen refuelling station but then I don't live in California and that's why the idea of increasing your range using hydrogen isn't ever going to work. You'd just do better waiting a year or two for faster charging batteries or just accept that current vehicles really are close to perfect for most people. A Tesla 3 LR has a range of 390 miles and charges from 20% to 80% in 24 minutes. 0-60 times are also around 4 seconds. Do you really need to add hydrogen fuel cells?
Click to expand...
According to InsideEV, the 2021 Tesla EV, "charging from 20% to 80% SOC took about 31 minutes." That's with a Supercharger station, which afaik isn't an option for Hyundai EVs.

And, of course, if you're only charging 60% at a time, you're losing 40% of your range. If you base the base Tesla rather than the LR model, that means you're having to recharge every 150 miles.
 
Endymio said:
According to InsideEV, the 2021 Tesla EV, "charging from 20% to 80% SOC took about 31 minutes." That's with a Supercharger station, which afaik isn't an option for Hyundai EVs.
Click to expand...
There are a lot of variables such as the Tesla year and model and the maximum charge a charger can give out, The figure I gave was correct for the model I mentioned. I believe all EVs can now use Tesla supercharges assuming they have the correct lead or adaptor.

Endymio said:
And, of course, if you're only charging 60% at a time, you're losing 40% of your range. If you base the base Tesla rather than the LR model, that means you're having to recharge every 150 miles.
Click to expand...
That's generally how you recharge EV's using charging stations as it's faster and better for the battery. The latest model 3's add about 175 miles range in 15 minutes. In reality, I suspect most owners just slow charge at home where it only costs a few dollars to fully charge their vehicle and they wake up each morning with a vehicle ready to do another 300 miles.

Personally, I can't remember the last time I drove that distance in a day so I don't need more range than what's currently on offer. I'm not saying there's anything wrong with ICE vehicles apart from fuel costs, maintenance costs, lack of performance and that feeling that your riding around in something from a bygone era ;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Scientists develop breakthrough method for extracting water from lunar soil
Replies
2
Views
61
This $50 thumb drive doubles as a camera, still in crowdfunding stage
Replies
1
Views
42
Remedy announces plans for TV and film adaptations of Control and Alan Wake
Replies
1
Views
33