Posts: 397   +5
Staff
In a nutshell: An unlikely contestant has emerged in the race toward cracking the fusion code, which has seen the biggest labs and richest billionaires pouring billions into various projects: a university student who assembled a reactor right in his bedroom in just four weeks. He did this by spending around $2,000 on some off-the-shelf parts he ordered online.

Hudhayfa Nazoordeen, a math major at the University of Waterloo, created a mini fusor that resembles an actual tokamak and hooked it up to a humble 12kV neon sign transformer for power. The result was a setup that could successfully produce plasma, which is where the fusion magic happens.

With "zero hardware experience," he spent week one just sourcing and figuring out all the components needed from suppliers like McMaster-Carr. Week two involved the nuts and bolts of assembling the main chamber and rectifier circuit. By week three, he had the whole thing set up in his bedroom and began tinkering away to get that neon transformer integrated.

However, it was cracking the vacuum system in "week 3.5" that seemed to really put Nazoordeen's perseverance to the test.

"This was by far the most annoying part of this project," he admitted in a thread on X/Twitter describing the project. He had to hunt down and seal multiple tiny leaks to ultimately achieve a vacuum of 25 millionths of an atmosphere.

Achieving a vacuum environment is important because fusion requires ridiculously low pressure to let the nuclei get close enough to fuse. Nazoordeen opted for an MKS-901p transducer to monitor and control the vacuum continuously.

Besides the help he received from other engineers on campus, Nazoordeen also gushed about Anthropic's Claude 3.5 AI chatbot, which also played a major role in the development of the reactor.

"I fed Claude all my datasheets, and it helped a ton with this," he said.

Of course, this homemade fusor didn't quite make it to inducing fusion this time, so it doesn't technically emit neutrons. Achieving that is extremely challenging in a small design like this. It would most likely require significant further engineering and potentially moving to more advanced reactor concepts.

However, Nazoordeen seems to have more planned for this little project and says he's waiting for funding for the "full fusor."

Nazoordeen's work builds on earlier exploits of Olivia Li, an engineer from the University of Toronto, who last year constructed her own fusion reactor in a New York City apartment using deuterium gas extracted from heavy water. Li praised Nazoordeen's achievements.

"A lot of people I've talked to have been excited about building a fusion reactor. Hudzah is the only person to have actually went on and executed!" she wrote on X. She also shared a link to a write-up that she says would help anybody else wanting to make their own fusor at home.

Image credit: Hudhayfa Nazoordeen

Permalink to story:

 
I want to give this guy a pat on the back, because it would be quite the feat given his lack of experience and accomplishing it in only 4 weeks. However, in this day of fake everything (including peer reviewed tech publications), I find it hard to believe this is true without an independent assessment.

Genius or internet hoax?
 
Having gone through what it takes to "home build" a vacuum system many years ago, I empathize with his pain at hunting down leaks. If one is attempting to seal such leaks, you either need something like better gaskets, or if they are pinholes, you need an epoxy that does not "outgass" at such low pressures. I am not sure of the pressures I got to, but they were lower than 0.001-torr. I was able to "bury" my thermocouple gauge at the low end of the scale, but I also had a diffusion pump and a cold trap along with a mechanical pump similar to the pump he has. The gauge he has is more sophisticated than the one that I had at the time.

I cannot see his vacuum pump model, so its impossible to tell the limit pressure limit of a pump like that without knowing the model number. But 25-millionths of an atmosphere is approximately 0.019 Torr (which is a more common unit of vacuum pressure measurement for laboratory grade vacuum equipment) indicates to me that the pump is not all that great. The better pumps like this (direct-drive dual-stage pumps) can reach .1 millitorr or 0.0001 torr - so if he has one of those, his vacuum system likely still has leaks. I'd like to see a better picture of the pressure indicated by his sensor - which seems to be up to the task before making any more comments about his setup.

Producing plasma is one thing and is relatively easy - think neon signs and argon/krypton lasers. But creating a fusion is another task all together, and I'm skeptical of the ability of a setup like this to produce fusion. Regardless of what others might say about funding and grants, if creating fusion in such a small device were that easy, someone would have done it by now, IMO.
 
Last edited:
That vacuum pump appears to be of the type that is used to pull a vacuum on A/C systems prior to the installation of the refrigerant.

It looks similar to a Kozyvacu brand vacuum pump but, of course, I can't be sure.
 
That vacuum pump appears to be of the type that is used to pull a vacuum on A/C systems prior to the installation of the refrigerant.

It looks similar to a Kozyvacu brand vacuum pump but, of course, I can't be sure.
Pumps that are good enough for A/C systems typically are not capable of reaching the same pressures as pumps that look similar but are made for laboratories. Laboratory grade pumps (made by Edwards or Savant or a similar company) like this can typically reach a vacuum that is an order of magnitude (factor of 10) greater than a pump meant for evacuating A/C systems. They are also much more expensive and finding a used one on E-bay that is in good shape may have eaten his whole $2K budget.
 
This kid has figured out, and thwarted the sabotage that big oil, and big energy has done to the fusion effort. You see going big isn't the best way to do research. Get a small version working first. Iron out all the problems, then scale up. But not too big. If a small version reaches a good state, then double the size. Get that version working, then double the size again. Starting huge means your design had better be absolutely on point, or the whole thing fails. A smaller device is easier to change, or completely throw away for a totally new design. Building big commits you to failure. Building small allows for success, which can be built on.
 
I'm just wondering what student has $2k lying around? :)
 
... and what could happen if it really achieve fusion on this home made fusion reactor and by some luck/unluck it output a LOT of energy? Am I wrong or could it blow his apartment?

 
Anyone have Raja vibes?
 
... and what could happen if it really achieve fusion on this home made fusion reactor and by some luck/unluck it output a LOT of energy? Am I wrong or could it blow his apartment?
Probably not enough mass to blow up his apartment or dorm room, but perhaps enough output to attract the attention of the DOE, in the US, and get the contraption confiscated. He's U-Waterloo which is outside of Toronto, so any "regulatory action" would be the responsibility of Canada.

Again, its too small and no where near producing a bonafide Fusion reaction.
 
... and what could happen if it really achieve fusion on this home made fusion reactor and by some luck/unluck it output a LOT of energy? Am I wrong or could it blow his apartment?
We're talking about 48 watts of power according to one of his posts: "achieved plasma at 4kv and 12ma".

Even if he achieved actual fusion on this scale it wouldn't blow a fuse let alone blow up something.

You don't trip and accidentally create a reactor 1000X bigger than expected.
 
This kid has figured out, and thwarted the sabotage that big oil, and big energy has done to the fusion effort. You see going big isn't the best way to do research. Get a small version working first. Iron out all the problems, then scale up. But not too big. If a small version reaches a good state, then double the size. Get that version working, then double the size again. Starting huge means your design had better be absolutely on point, or the whole thing fails. A smaller device is easier to change, or completely throw away for a totally new design. Building big commits you to failure. Building small allows for success, which can be built on.

First off, he isn't doing research. He created a small-scale model based on existing knowledge from previous discoveries from research. It is an impressively difficult model, but it did not create new knowledge in any way.

Second, researchers are familiar with the concept of smaller-scale prototyping. It's not a secret. It is definitely not being kept a secret by a powerful conspiracy.
 

Similar threads