midian18

Posts: 10,034   +134
Staff member
A hot potato: Another company has decided to drag its employees back to the office full-time while blasting the alleged disadvantages of remote and hybrid work. Nothing, the British firm behind several stylish and well-received phones and earbuds, has decided that "Remote work is not compatible with a high ambition level plus high speed." CEO Carl Pei wants workers back five days per week, suggesting that those unable to make this commitment should leave the company.

Pei made the announcement to his 450 employees in an internal email last Friday that he later shared on LinkedIn. He notes that when the company started in 2020, Covid rules meant that fully remote work was the only option.

Nothing later moved to a hybrid work schedule at its London site and fully in-office at other sites. Now, it is transitioning to fully in-office at London, too.

Pei said there were three reasons why hybrid and remote setups are not right for Nothing's business. First, the fact the company makes physical products means design, engineering, manufacturing, and quality have to collaborate closely.

Second, Pei said creativity and innovation allow Nothing to compete with bigger companies, and these things do not work well remotely, apparently.

Third, the CEO said remote work was not compatible with Nothing's ambitions of becoming a generation-defining company that moves fast.

Pei essentially told employees unwilling or unable to come into the office five days per week to quit, though he did so using typical CEO-speak: "We know it's not the right type of setup for everybody, and that's OK," he wrote. "We should look for a mutual fit. You should find an environment where you thrive, and we need to find people who want to go the full mile with us in the decades ahead."

Pei's phrasing brings to mind a similar message from Andy Jassy last year. The Amazon CEO told employees who didn't want to return to the office that "It's probably not going to work out for you."

Most companies calling back workers adopt a 3-day per week hybrid work setup, and even that has been causing outcry among staff who say they are more productive and certainly happier being at home full time. Other companies, such as those belonging to Elon Musk, have been much harsher in their demands: get in the office at least 40 hours per week or leave.

CEOs (and former CEOs) don't seem to care very much about employee happiness, of course. Ex-Google boss Eric Schmidt recently blamed Google's hybrid work policy for it lagging behind OpenAI, though he later said he "misspoke" and regretted his error.

Permalink to story:

 
Why is TechSpot reporting on the office policies of a small British company that makes earbuds? Who cares what this one tiny insignificant company thinks or does.
 
Why is TechSpot reporting on the office policies of a small British company that makes earbuds? Who cares what this one tiny insignificant company thinks or does.

The more tech news sites report on companies banning work-from-home, the more "normal" and "expected" it gets that more and more companies make the same policies. The agenda is probably for the entire industry to stop work-from-home.

That's my guess as to why a small London office of a small earbud manufacturer matters enough to be news.
 
The more tech news sites report on companies banning work-from-home, the more "normal" and "expected" it gets that more and more companies make the same policies. The agenda is probably for the entire industry to stop work-from-home.

That's my guess as to why a small London office of a small earbud manufacturer matters enough to be news.
TechSpots employees are remote tho, so why do they care about this.
 
I've stopped caring about these return to work articles that come out pretty much every day. Always a repeat of execs demonstrating that they truly don't care about humans as people when it comes to running a company, which is how they became a CEO in the first place.
 
The way I look at it is if a company says they want you to work from home, fine.
Also, if a company says you have to work from an office fine.
It's the OWNER of the company that makes that decision. If you don't like it, so somewhere else.
 
They blame the employee's because their managers don't know how to manage .... sounds like typical American management .....
 
It's a private company and they aren't twisting people's arms to work for them. If you can't abide by their rules then go find another job. People who work in the restaurant industry can't work from home so how do you think they feel? We would tell them if they didn't like it then go find another job.
 
Managers that are unable to manage...

Manager: BUT BUT BUT, I can't manage you if you work from home!!!... I have to trust my subordinates!!!
 
The way I look at it is if a company says they want you to work from home, fine.
Also, if a company says you have to work from an office fine.
It's the OWNER of the company that makes that decision. If you don't like it, so somewhere else.
Please arrive in 2024... thank you...
 

Similar threads