midian18

Posts: 10,011   +131
Staff member
Why it matters: Arguably one of the best additions to X/Twitter in recent years has been the community notes feature, which allows contributors to add context such as pointing out incorrect facts beneath posts. YouTube, another platform rife with misinformation, is testing a new feature that works the same way.

YouTube says that the experimental feature will allow users of the platform to add notes to provide relevant, timely, and easy-to-understand context on videos. It gives examples such as when a song is meant to be a parody, which some people apparently need pointing out, when a new version of a product being reviewed is available, or letting viewers know when older footage is mistakenly (or intentionally) portrayed as a current event.

YouTube is currently inviting a limited number of eligible contributors who are channel owners to write the notes. The initial pilot will involve third-party evaluators, not users, rating the helpfulness of these notes, which will help train the systems. Contributors themselves will rate notes as well as the pilot program advances. Eventually, assuming the feature rolls out fully, everyone will be able to write and rate notes.

As explained by YouTube: "When you find a video that might be confusing or inaccurate, you can submit a note clarifying it. Your contributions will be reviewed by others with a wide range of views to ensure their quality and helpfulness before being added to the information panel below the video."

If they're found to be broadly helpful, the notes will be displayed beneath videos in a blue box and can be expanded by clicking on them, much like comments. People will be asked whether they think a note is "helpful," "somewhat helpful," or "unhelpful" and why. YouTube will then use a bridging-based algorithm to consider the ratings and determine what notes are published.

YouTube says testers should submit notes on videos they find inaccurate or unclear, emphasizing that they should be written in their own words and not use text copied directly from sources. The notes should also add clarity or useful context to videos.

The pilot program will only be available on mobile, in the US, and in English to start. Viewers, participants, and creators are invited to give YouTube feedback on the quality of notes.

YouTube is the world's second-most-popular website behind Google.com, with over 30 billion visits per month. It also has a misinformation problem that Google has been battling for years. Community notes have helped address this issue somewhat on X, and they could do the same on Google's video platform.

Permalink to story:

 
Well better than just letting the misinformation seat there...but it would be better if those providing the misinformation would be immediately flagged and banned.
 
Lying is legally protected speech in America unless used to defraud someone or in some communications with government. Yes that has a legal meaning. SCOTUS has already made rulings in this regard.

Particularly, slander and libel are only such if actual damages were done to that person.

People using the term misinformation have already lost to the censorious mob.
 
Youtube would be wise to return to their original core business and stop all the "improvements". Their recent "improvements" has lead to quite a few contributors no longer uploading anything useful. I look forward to another product that can replace Youtube completely ....
 
You cannot fight lying even by calling it misinformation. Everyone lies. BTW, are they trying to take the stigma out of lying by calling it misinformation?
 
I think that any sane company should only look to twitter if they want to *INCREASE* misinformation and right-wing propaganda given the direction Musk has taken the site into.
 
Hmm. I can think of things that *could* be misinformation or *could* be true depending on one's political view point.

YT already remove things they don't like, so what's the point?

I saw a fact check on Reuters about a story regarding a UK politician claiming £3500 in heating allowance. They declared it false. Reading further, they stated they were claiming £2700 for their 2 homes. Whether it's £3500 or £2700, they're still enjoying quite a big perk the vast majority of us don't get.
That's not fact-checking, that's nitpicking.
 
Writing about YT/google going back is kind of funny.

Not sure if say in 2010 for example if we had huge bot farms, or such good AI deepfake tools + so many spammers

Never been on twitter so not sure how it works

But all these companies need some tools going forward. YT probably already tries to stop those spamming out 10000s of videos that are there for just click revenue
When I see dross in my feed, I always hit don't recommend this channel

Not sure of answer, but people dreaming these companies want to pay huge server costs and allow 90% of content to become AI generated BS from huge Bot farms for disinformation or revenue clicks , or scamming

Even on "open" platforms their is natural group censorship and mind think

You have to really look to find good places for open discussion , and not just people like me p*ssing in the wind .
We can have it here on some topics and not others. Mostly it also relies on someone having some expertise in some topics

Probably DIY forums , and hobbies etc are best

 
Hmm. I can think of things that *could* be misinformation or *could* be true depending on one's political view point.

YT already remove things they don't like, so what's the point?

I saw a fact check on Reuters about a story regarding a UK politician claiming £3500 in heating allowance. They declared it false. Reading further, they stated they were claiming £2700 for their 2 homes. Whether it's £3500 or £2700, they're still enjoying quite a big perk the vast majority of us don't get.
That's not fact-checking, that's nitpicking.
What you wrote at the end is what you'll most likely find in a community note.
 
Misinformation = censorship
people need to stop being ignorant on purpose = Stupid

Doctor 1 : Eating eggs is unhealthy (older people follow this get brain problems)
Doctor 2 : Eating read meat is unhealthy (older people end up with health disorders)
Nutrionist : Eating eggs in the morning meat at lunch is the healthiest food you can eat (healthy till 95yrs old)

Treating information as good or bad or true or false is also a matter of perspective, you can't just cancel a post because you think its false, which is something the Communists love to do
 

Similar threads