Intel extends Raptor Lake CPU warranty by two years due to crashing issues

Daniel Sims

Posts: 1,511   +46
Staff
In brief: Intel previously confirmed that owners of 13th or 14th-gen Raptor Lake processors that are crashing or suffering from other instability issues must return them to resolve the problem. Now, the company is giving customers more breathing room to order RMAs without additional costs. Those with Raptor Lake CPUs that still work fine should switch to the company's default voltage baselines.

Amid high failure rates, Intel will offer two years of extended warranty for 13th- and 14th-generation desktop processors sold at retail. The company will share further details over the next few days.

The extension only applies to independently purchased boxed CPUs. Customers seeking returns should contact Intel customer support. Impacted Raptor Lake processors purchased with pre-built systems are subject to manufacturer warranties, and users must contact their OEM's customer support.

Retail Intel CPUs normally include a three-year limited warranty. The oldest 13th-gen chips sold around the end of 2022 would have remained within warranty until late 2025. The extension presumably pushes the deadline to Q4 2027 or early 2028.

Owners of chips from Intel's 13th- and 14th-gen Core lineups have reported instability and high crash rates for most of 2024. The issue mostly affects high-end K processors, but recent reports suggest that every desktop CPU with a TDP of 65W or above is susceptible.

Intel traced the problem to a microcode algorithm error, which it plans to address with a mid-August patch. Unfortunately, units already exhibiting instability have likely received permanent damage, so the update won't fix them, thus the warranty extension. Users who haven't yet experienced crashes should engage Intel's recommended baseline voltages and knock on wood.

Chipzilla has refused calls to recall the affected CPUs. Developer Alderon Games suggested a recall after high failure rates pushed the company to switch to AMD processors going forward.

Furthermore, a VFX studio claimed that half of its Intel systems have failed, and a major European retailer reported that RMAs for Raptor Lake processors at least tripled the prior 12th-generation Alder Lake chips. Additionally, Intel faces the threat of a class action lawsuit if enough people find its customer service experience unsatisfactory.

In other bad news for Intel, the company recently announced a massive round of layoffs. Chipzilla slashed over 15 percent of its workforce – around 17,500 employees. Predicting lower-than-expected revenue for the third quarter, Intel also suspended fourth-quarter dividend sharing.

Permalink to story:

 
It's better than nothing, but really it should be a ten-year warranty while at the same time, Intel is forced to continue making those chips until the year 2034 to accommodate people who might run a system for ten or so years.

Yes, it's going to cost them a lot to implement what I said above but hey, Intel got themselves into this mess by pushing their architecture too damn far and this is their punishment.
 
Excellent news. For years I have fought against Intel fanboys who have claimed Intel CPUs being more stable than AMD CPUs. Now even Intel admits their own CPUs are unstable. Finally we have undeniable evidence that AMD indeed make stable CPUs and Intel makes unstable CPUs. This is dream come true :)
 
Unfortunately Intel is in serious trouble. Intel's share price took a nosedive today.

For consumers this is bad news.

A CPU market dominated by AMD is just as bad as a CPU market dominated by Intel, as was the case in the last decade.
 
It's better than nothing, but really it should be a ten-year warranty while at the same time, Intel is forced to continue making those chips until the year 2034 to accommodate people who might run a system for ten or so years.

Yes, it's going to cost them a lot to implement what I said above but hey, Intel got themselves into this mess by pushing their architecture too damn far and this is their punishment.
I'm one who hasn't built a PC in 11 years, so a 10-year warranty would deliver further peace-of-mind. G•Skill offers a lifetime warranty on their RAM, which greatly influenced my decision to purchase that brand's RAM in my build, and it's still flawless after 11 years. Why can't Intel stand behind their products in the way G•Skill does?
 
I'm one who hasn't built a PC in 11 years, so a 10-year warranty would deliver further peace-of-mind. G•Skill offers a lifetime warranty on their RAM, which greatly influenced my decision to purchase that brand's RAM in my build, and it's still flawless after 11 years. Why can't Intel stand behind their products in the way G•Skill does?
G-Skill RAM has a lifetime warranty? I didn't know that. Makes me glad that I have G-Skill DDR5 memory in my system.
 
And that is why?
AMD is not your friend. Just like Intel, they're an amoral corporation that exists to make as much money for their shareholders as possible. If they can charge more for their parts due to lack of competition, they will. They've done it in the past when they had a period of performance dominance in the early 2000s. The demise of Intel would lead to a total monopoly in the x86 space, which would lead to significant price increases and probably technological stagnation.
 
AMD is not your friend. Just like Intel, they're an amoral corporation that exists to make as much money for their shareholders as possible. If they can charge more for their parts due to lack of competition, they will. They've done it in the past when they had a period of performance dominance in the early 2000s. The demise of Intel would lead to a total monopoly in the x86 space, which would lead to significant price increases and probably technological stagnation.
Because AMD wants money for their CPUs so that they can develop better CPUs, AMD is as bad as Intel? I'm pretty sure you know about Intel antitrust case against AMD. Now, have AMD made anything that compares to that? No. That is, AMD is at this moment much more my friend than Intel.

Also, since Athlon AMD has driven technology forward on x86 space. Yeah, they made some wrong decisions and had financial problems, but on many cases they were years ahead Intel (IMC, chiplets etc) and architecture wise AMD has always at least tried to make big improvements, unlike Intel.

It's pretty hard to put so much BS on short post like that. Congratulations, I guess.
 
People complain Intel is trying to deter users from RMA-ing by false statements like CPU is fake and etc. Shame on you Intel !
 
Last edited:
Because AMD wants money for their CPUs so that they can develop better CPUs, AMD is as bad as Intel? I'm pretty sure you know about Intel antitrust case against AMD. Now, have AMD made anything that compares to that? No. That is, AMD is at this moment much more my friend than Intel.

Also, since Athlon AMD has driven technology forward on x86 space. Yeah, they made some wrong decisions and had financial problems, but on many cases they were years ahead Intel (IMC, chiplets etc) and architecture wise AMD has always at least tried to make big improvements, unlike Intel.

It's pretty hard to put so much BS on short post like that. Congratulations, I guess.

If you feel AMD & Lisa Su are selfless uh John Brownites standing up against evil Godzilla, I've got some seaside property I'd like to sell you in Arkansas.
 
Back