Skip to main content

Four months later, Intel CPU stability issues remain

Intel's 14900K CPU socketed in a motherboard.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

It’s been over four months since the first reports of instability in Intel’s top CPUs started cropping up, and we are yet to see a fix. Although Intel has been working with its partners on delivering updates that would address the problem, the company itself had to admit in a recent community post that it still hasn’t found the root cause.

Meanwhile, hardware testers are finding that even using Intel’s recommended workarounds still ends up in crashes and unstable performance — and the only solutions that seem to work are things that you’ll have to settle for.

Ever since Intel admitted to the problem, there have been many whispers about the potential cause and fix. It recommended that users, alongside motherboard vendors, stick to its baseline power delivery profile (although there’s been some confusion about which profile that should be, exactly). However, Hardware Times found that even using the Intel Baseline power profile on a chip that’s never been used in another power setting doesn’t alleviate this problem.

The publication detailed its journey with Core i9-13900K chips, and it’s not been great, what with three Raptor Lake chips that had to be returned over the last two months. This includes two Core i9-13900KF (one of those was sent in as a replacement for the first one) chips and one Core i7-14700KF chip.

According to Hardware Times, the first Core i9-13900KF chip only ever ran on the Intel Baseline profile, but just two months in, they started experiencing system crashes during gaming. Eventually, the PCIe Gen 5 lanes that were connected to the GPU malfunctioned, at which point the chip was RMA’d. Once the replacement arrived, it only took a week for it to start crashing with Blue Screens of Death (BSOD). The crashes were no more or less frequent regardless of the power delivery profile, be it the recommended Intel Baseline or the MSI 4096W.

Intel’s recent announcement revealed that the investigation revealed that there’s a bug in the Enhanced Thermal Velocity Boost (eTVB) algorithm, and the bug has been patched. However, we’re not out of the woods yet. Intel said: “While this eTVB bug is potentially contributing to instability, it is not the root cause of the instability issue.”

Intel Core i9-13900K held between fingertips.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

Hardware Times’ testing corroborates Intel’s statement. Tests revealed that the new BIOS update reduced the number of crashes, but didn’t eliminate them entirely. Although the system now experienced fewer BSODs, it started crashing to desktop (CTD) instead — most commonly in fast-paced games.

Examining the performance before the crash revealed some more interesting tidbits. For starters, the Core i9-13900KF started underperforming a few minutes before the crash, with the CPU power dropping by up to 40%, followed by a drop in CPU usage and clocks, but only on efficiency cores. There was a decline in frames per second (fps), too, and a massive one: About 20%. However, the game still maintained over 100 fps.

The stability issues mostly affect the Core i9-14900K and the Core i9-13900K, but people have also reported problems with Core i7 chips, too. There’s a lot to complain about, ranging from crashes during gaming to encountering BSODs. These problems reportedly led to an increase in customer returns on Intel’s 14th-gen and 13th-gen CPUs, at least in Korea, but this situation is affecting users on a global scale, although it’s hard to estimate just how common it is. It’s certainly persistent, though.

What can you do if you currently own a high-end Raptor Lake processor? Unfortunately, not much. Hardware Times finds that capping your frame rate at 60 fps can help. Playing at higher resolutions can be helpful too, as the GPU shoulders the majority of the load at 2K and above. Underclocking and undervolting the processor can also be helpful, although Intel’s recommendation is still to use the Baseline Profile, which is what might be the safest option for now.

Editors' Recommendations

Monica J. White
Monica is a UK-based freelance writer and self-proclaimed geek. A firm believer in the "PC building is just like expensive…
The iPhone 15’s chip challenges Intel’s fastest desktop CPU — but there’s a catch
Intel Core i9-13900K held between fingertips.

Who would have thought that some of the best CPUs would face competition not from a desktop or laptop CPU, but from a mobile system-on-a-chip (SoC)? Well, the latest Geekbench 6 scores prove that it's possible. Apple's new A17 Pro chip, announced during the September 2023 Apple event and found in the iPhone 15 Pro and Pro Max, challenges AMD and Intel -- but there's a catch.

Yes, it's real. The Geekbench 6 test gives the A17 Pro chip a score of 2,914 in single-core operations, and that's mighty impressive for something that will end up in a smartphone. However, the generational leap is not that impressive -- the last-gen A16 Bionic chip is only around 10% behind in terms of single-threaded performance. The A17 Pro was built based on TSMC's 3nm technology, while the A16 Bionic is a 5nm chip, also made by TSMC.

Read more
Intel Core i5 vs. i7: Which CPU is right for you in 2023?
Intel Core i5-12400F box sitting in front of a gaming PC.

Intel's Core i5 and i7 CPUs continue to be the most popular choice in the realm of processors, and rightfully so. But understanding the distinctions between them is not a straightforward task. Similar to numerous other computer components, there are various models within each tier, which can potentially lead to a somewhat overwhelming selection process.

We're here to break down all the differences between Intel's Core i5 and Core i7 CPUs, both on desktop and mobile. They're closer than they were in previous years, and rumor has it that the naming scheme will be replaced outright later this year. But for now, it's still an important comparison to wrap your mind around if you're in the market.
Intel Core i5 vs i7: what’s the difference?

Read more
Google is bringing AI to the classroom — in a big way
a teacher teaching teens

Google is already incorporating its Gemini AI assistant into the rest of its product ecosystem to help individuals and businesses streamline their existing workflows. Now, the Silicon Valley titan is looking to bring AI into the classroom.
While we've already seen the damage that teens can do when given access to generative AI, Google argues that it is taking steps to ensure the technology is employed responsibly by students and academic faculty alike.
Following last year's initial rollout of a teen-safe version of Gemini for personal use, the company at the time decided to not enable the AI's use with school-issued accounts. That will change in the coming months as Google makes the AI available free of charge to students in over 100 countries though its Google Workspace for Education accounts and school-issued Chromebooks.
Teens that meet Google's minimum age requirements -- they have to be 13 or older in the U.S., 18 or over in the European Economic Area (EEA), Switzerland, Canada, and the U.K. -- will be able to converse with Gemini as they would on their personal accounts. That includes access to features like Help me write, Help me read, generative AI backgrounds, and AI-powered noise cancellation. The company was quick to point out that no personal data from this program will be used to train AI models, and that school administrators will be granted admin access to implement or remove features as needed.
What's more, teens will be able to organize and track their homework assignments through Google Task and Calendar integrations as well as collaborate with their peers using Meet and Assignments.
Google Classroom will also integrate with the school's Student Information System (SIS), allowing educators to set up classes and import pertinent data such as student lists and grading settings. They'll also have access to an expanded Google for Education App Hub with 16 new app integrations including Kami, Quizizz, and Screencastify available at launch.
Students will also have access to the Read Along in Classroom feature, which provides them with real-time, AI-based reading help. Conversely, educators will receive feedback from the AI on the student's reading accuracy, speed, and comprehension.
In the coming months, Google also hopes to introduce the ability for teachers to generate personalized stories tailored to each student's specific education needs. The feature is currently available in English, with more than 800 books for teachers to choose from, though it will soon offer support for other languages, starting with Spanish.
Additionally, Google is piloting a suite of Gemini in Classroom tools that will enable teachers to "define groups of students in Classroom to assign different content based on each group’s needs." The recently announced Google Vids, which helps users quickly and easily cut together engaging video clips, will be coming to the classroom as well. A non-AI version of Vids arrives on Google Workspace for Education Plus later this year, while the AI-enhanced version will only be available as a Workspace add-on.
That said, Google has apparently not forgotten just how emotionally vicious teenagers can be. As such, the company is incorporating a number of safety and privacy tools into the new AI system. For example, school administrators will be empowered to prevent students from initiating direct messages and creating spaces to hinder bullying.
Admins will also have the option to block access to Classroom from compromised Android and iOS devices, and can require multiparty approval (i.e. at least two school officials) before security-sensitive changes (like turning off two-step authentication) can be implemented.
Google is introducing a slew of accessibility features as well. Chromebooks will get a new Read Aloud feature in the Chrome browser, for example. Extract Text from PDF will leverage OCR technology to make PDFs accessible to screen readers through the Chrome browser, while the Files app will soon offer augmented image labels to assist screen readers with relaying the contents of images in Chrome.
Later this year, Google also plans to release a feature that will allow users to control their Chromebooks using only their facial expressions and head movements.
These features all sound impressive and should help bring AI into the classroom in a safe and responsible manner -- in theory, at least. Though given how quickly today's teens can exploit security loopholes to bypass their school's web filters, Google's good intentions could ultimately prove insufficient.

Read more