Alec Baldwin's request to dismiss criminal charge in fatal 'Rust' shooting rejected by judge

Baldwin is still facing charges of involuntary manslaughter

Alec Baldwin's request to dismiss criminal charge in fatal 'Rust' shooting rejected by judge

Baldwin is still facing charges of involuntary manslaughter

BUT FIRST, BACK TO SHELLEY AND DOUG, A SANTA FE JUDGE TODAY. FACED WITH DECIDING WHETHER INVOLUNTARY MANSLAUGHTER CHARGES FOR ACTOR ALEC BALDWIN SHOULD BE DISMISSED, THERE WAS NO RULING. BUT BEFORE GOING TO BREAKING NEWS, ACTION 7 NEWS REPORTER JOHN CARDINALE FOUND THOSE ARGUMENTS GOT HEATED. THIS IS A HOMICIDE CASE. PROSECUTORS ARE REQUIRED TO DO BETTER THAN THIS. THIS INDICTMENT SHOULD BE DISMISSED. BALDWIN’S LEGAL TEAM CAME WITH MULTIPLE ARGUMENTS. THEY ACCUSED SPECIAL PROSECUTOR CARRIE MORRISSEY OF TRYING THE CASE IN THE MEDIA, CLAIMING SHE LEAKED GRAND JURY DETAILS THAT ARE SUPPOSED TO BE SECRET, AND PAID AN EXPERT TO DISCUSS THE CASE ON NATIONAL TV. THE STATE PAID BRIAN CARPENTER TO GO ON MULTIPLE TV SHOWS, INCLUDING THE SEAN HANNITY SHOW, TO DISPARAGE MR. BALDWIN, MAKE COMMENTS ABOUT HIS ULTIMATE GUILT, SAYING HE PULLED THE TRIGGER, HAD A DUTY OF CARE. HE HAS CONTINUED TO INDICATE THAT THAT THERE WAS A STATEMENT THAT THEY CLAIMED TO BE ATTRIBUTED TO ME. THAT CAME OUT, I THINK, ON THE TODAY SHOW. THAT STATEMENT HAS NEVER BEEN ATTRIBUTED TO ME. BALDWIN’S TEAM ALSO ARGUING THE GRAND JURY WHO INDICTED HIM WAS GUIDED AWAY FROM QUESTIONS. CERTAIN WITNESSES. AT ONE POINT, JUDGE MARY MARLOWE, SAMOUR, ASKED MORRISSEY WHY THAT WAS THE CASE. AND SO YOU’RE GOING TO TELL ME THAT SHE COULD NOT HAVE ANSWERED THIS. AND SO THE BOTTOM LINE IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF MAKING SURE THESE GUNS, THESE BULLETS ARE NOT LIES ARE UP TO WHAT DAVID HALLS AND HANNAH. AND YOU DID NOT LET HER ANSWER THAT QUESTION. YOU SAID WE ARE GOING TO HAVE ANOTHER WITNESS ADDRESS THOSE ISSUES FOR YOU. I DID NOT PREVENT THE GRAND JURY FROM GETTING THE ANSWERS TO THE QUESTIONS I MADE SURE THAT THE GRAND JURY GOT THE ANSWERS TO THEIR QUESTIONS FROM THE WITNESS WITH THE MOST EXPERIENCE. AT ONE POINT, MORRISSEY GOT FRUSTRATED. I’M NOT GOING TO SIT HERE AND BE CALLED A LIAR. UM, I ABSOLUTELY HAVE DID. I DID EVERYTHING THAT I HAVE TOLD THE COURT THAT I DID TODAY. WHILE A JUDGE DIDN’T MAKE A DECISION FRIDAY, KOAT LEGAL EXPERT JOHN DAY SAYS IT’S NOT COMMON FOR A GRAND JURY INDICTMENT TO BE DISMISSED UNLESS SOMETHING PROCEDURALLY WENT WRONG. YOU KNOW, WE HAVE NO IDEA WHAT’S IN THIS JUDGE’S MIND, BUT WE DO KNOW SHE WAS VERY TARGETED IN WHAT SHE WAS ASKING THE SPECIAL PROSECUTORS, AND SHE HAD A LOT OF CONCERNS. I’M JOHN CARDINALE REPORTING FOR KOAT ACTION SEVEN NEWS. THE JUDGE DID NOT SAY EXACTLY WHEN SHE WILL MAKE THE DECISION. BALDWIN, WHO DID NOT ATTEND THE HEARING, FACES THE SAME CHARGE OF INVOLUNTARY MANSLAUGHTER AS RUST ARMORER HANNAH GUTIERREZ-REED THI
Advertisement
Alec Baldwin's request to dismiss criminal charge in fatal 'Rust' shooting rejected by judge

Baldwin is still facing charges of involuntary manslaughter

A New Mexico judge has rejected a request by Alec Baldwin to dismiss the sole criminal charge against him in a fatal shooting on the set of "Rust," keeping the case on track for a trial this summer.Judge Mary Marlowe Sommer on Friday upheld an indictment charging Baldwin with one count of involuntary manslaughter in the death of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins in 2021. The judge rejected defense arguments that prosecutors flouted the rules of grand jury proceedings to divert attention away from exculpatory evidence and witnesses.Special prosecutors have denied the accusations and said Baldwin made "shameless" attempts to escape culpability, highlighting contradictions in his statements to law enforcement, to workplace safety regulators and in a televised interview.Friday’s decision removes one of the last hurdles for prosecutors to put Baldwin on trial in July.The indictment in January charged Baldwin with involuntary manslaughter in the fatal shooting of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins on Oct. 21, 2021, at a movie ranch on the outskirts of Santa Fe.Baldwin, a lead actor and co-producer on the Western, has pleaded not guilty to the charge, which carries a maximum sentence of 1.5 years in prison. His attorneys argued during the virtual hearing on Friday that the grand jury received a one-sided presentation in bad faith from prosecutors who steered jurors away from exculpatory evidence and witnesses.During rehearsal, Baldwin was pointing a gun at cinematographer Halyna Hutchins when the revolver went off, killing Hutchins and injuring Joel Souza, the director. Baldwin has maintained that he pulled back the gun’s hammer, but not the trigger.Baldwin’s motion to dismiss the indictment argued that the grand jury received inaccurate and limited testimony about the revolver and safety protocols on movie sets.Over more than two hours of arguments Friday, defense attorneys for Baldwin accused the special prosecutor of neglecting her responsibilities to ensure impartiality and access to the defense's witnesses and evidence.“The fix was in,” said defense attorney Alex Spiro. “There were no (defense) witnesses there to testify. There was no evidence binder of the defense exhibits.”“They never intended for the grand jury to ask for witnesses,” he continued. “They never wanted the grand jury to ask for exhibits.”Special prosecutors say they followed grand jury protocols and accuse Baldwin of “shameless” attempts to escape culpability, highlighting contradictions in his statements to law enforcement, to workplace safety regulators and in a televised interview. A jury trial is scheduled for July.Lead prosecutor Kari Morrissey on Friday defended her oversight of the grand jury, noting that she read to jurors a court-approved letter outlining procedures for accessing exculpatory evidence and witnesses and physically pointed at the defense's boxes of evidence.“The grand jury never asked to hear from witnesses. There is nothing I can do about that,” Morrissey said. “We followed all of the judge's orders.”Defense attorneys also highlighted that jurors were interrupted when they raised questions about safety procedures on film sets. Baldwin's attorneys said jurors were guided away from listening to testimony from a sheriff's detective and instead toward an expert witness paid by the prosecution to discuss film set safety.Judge Mary Marlowe Sommer seized on that point in a series of questions for Morrissey, asking why the detective wasn't allowed to answer. Morrissey said the detective was well acquainted with the wrong ways to handle gun safety on a movie set from investigating the “Rust” set, but not well versed on proper industry protocols.“I did not prevent the grand jury from getting answers,” Morrissey said. “I made sure the grand jury got the answers to their questions from the witness with the most experience.”Baldwin did not appear at the hearing. Prosecutors have turned their full attention to Baldwin after a judge in April sentenced movie weapons supervisor Hannah Gutierrez-Reed to the maximum of 1.5 years at a state penitentiary on an involuntary manslaughter conviction for Hutchins’ death.Prosecutors last year dismissed an earlier involuntary manslaughter charge against Baldwin after being told the gun he was holding might have been modified before the shooting and malfunctioned. A new analysis of the gun last year enabled prosecutors to reboot the case.The indictment against Baldwin offers two possible standards for prosecutors to pursue. One would be based on the negligent use of a firearm. An alternative is to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Baldwin caused Hutchins’ death without “due caution” or “circumspection,” also defined as “an act committed with total disregard or indifference for the safety of others.”Defense attorneys also say prosecutors steered the grand jury away from testimony by witnesses including the film's director, as well as assistant director and safety coordinator Dave Halls and props master Sarah Zachry. Halls last year pleaded no contest to negligent handling of a firearm and completed a sentence of six months of unsupervised probation.The two-week trial of Gutierrez-Reed gave attorneys for Baldwin and the public an unusual window into how the actor's own trial could unfold.Baldwin figured prominently in testimony and closing arguments that highlighted his authority as a co-producer and the lead actor on “Rust.” Both the prosecution and defense in Gutierrez-Reed’s trial dissected video footage of Baldwin before the fatal shooting for clues about breakdowns in firearms safety.Prosecutors said Gutierrez-Reed unwittingly brought live ammunition onto the set of “Rust,” where it was expressly prohibited and failed to follow basic gun safety protocols.Gutierrez-Reed is appealing the conviction, decided by a jury in March, to a higher court but hasn’t yet filed detailed arguments. At sentencing, Gutierrez-Reed told the judge she tried to do her best on the set despite not having “proper time, resources and staffing.”After the shooting in New Mexico, the filming of “Rust” resumed in Montana, under an agreement with Hutchins’ husband, Matthew Hutchins, which made him an executive producer. Matthew Hutchins and the Hutchins' son settled a wrongful death lawsuit in civil court under undisclosed terms.Defense attorneys said Baldwin was offered a deal last year to plead to a “minor offense” before a grand jury was convened, but the offer was "inexplicably retracted" before the deadline to respond.The Associated Press contributed to this report.

A New Mexico judge has rejected a request by Alec Baldwin to dismiss the sole criminal charge against him in a fatal shooting on the set of "Rust," keeping the case on track for a trial this summer.

Judge Mary Marlowe Sommer on Friday upheld an indictment charging Baldwin with one count of involuntary manslaughter in the death of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins in 2021. The judge rejected defense arguments that prosecutors flouted the rules of grand jury proceedings to divert attention away from exculpatory evidence and witnesses.

Advertisement

Special prosecutors have denied the accusations and said Baldwin made "shameless" attempts to escape culpability, highlighting contradictions in his statements to law enforcement, to workplace safety regulators and in a televised interview.

Friday’s decision removes one of the last hurdles for prosecutors to put Baldwin on trial in July.

The indictment in January charged Baldwin with involuntary manslaughter in the fatal shooting of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins on Oct. 21, 2021, at a movie ranch on the outskirts of Santa Fe.

Baldwin, a lead actor and co-producer on the Western, has pleaded not guilty to the charge, which carries a maximum sentence of 1.5 years in prison. His attorneys argued during the virtual hearing on Friday that the grand jury received a one-sided presentation in bad faith from prosecutors who steered jurors away from exculpatory evidence and witnesses.

During rehearsal, Baldwin was pointing a gun at cinematographer Halyna Hutchins when the revolver went off, killing Hutchins and injuring Joel Souza, the director. Baldwin has maintained that he pulled back the gun’s hammer, but not the trigger.

Baldwin’s motion to dismiss the indictment argued that the grand jury received inaccurate and limited testimony about the revolver and safety protocols on movie sets.

Over more than two hours of arguments Friday, defense attorneys for Baldwin accused the special prosecutor of neglecting her responsibilities to ensure impartiality and access to the defense's witnesses and evidence.

“The fix was in,” said defense attorney Alex Spiro. “There were no (defense) witnesses there to testify. There was no evidence binder of the defense exhibits.”

“They never intended for the grand jury to ask for witnesses,” he continued. “They never wanted the grand jury to ask for exhibits.”

Special prosecutors say they followed grand jury protocols and accuse Baldwin of “shameless” attempts to escape culpability, highlighting contradictions in his statements to law enforcement, to workplace safety regulators and in a televised interview. A jury trial is scheduled for July.

Lead prosecutor Kari Morrissey on Friday defended her oversight of the grand jury, noting that she read to jurors a court-approved letter outlining procedures for accessing exculpatory evidence and witnesses and physically pointed at the defense's boxes of evidence.

“The grand jury never asked to hear from witnesses. There is nothing I can do about that,” Morrissey said. “We followed all of the judge's orders.”

Defense attorneys also highlighted that jurors were interrupted when they raised questions about safety procedures on film sets. Baldwin's attorneys said jurors were guided away from listening to testimony from a sheriff's detective and instead toward an expert witness paid by the prosecution to discuss film set safety.

Judge Mary Marlowe Sommer seized on that point in a series of questions for Morrissey, asking why the detective wasn't allowed to answer. Morrissey said the detective was well acquainted with the wrong ways to handle gun safety on a movie set from investigating the “Rust” set, but not well versed on proper industry protocols.

“I did not prevent the grand jury from getting answers,” Morrissey said. “I made sure the grand jury got the answers to their questions from the witness with the most experience.”

Baldwin did not appear at the hearing. Prosecutors have turned their full attention to Baldwin after a judge in April sentenced movie weapons supervisor Hannah Gutierrez-Reed to the maximum of 1.5 years at a state penitentiary on an involuntary manslaughter conviction for Hutchins’ death.

Prosecutors last year dismissed an earlier involuntary manslaughter charge against Baldwin after being told the gun he was holding might have been modified before the shooting and malfunctioned. A new analysis of the gun last year enabled prosecutors to reboot the case.

The indictment against Baldwin offers two possible standards for prosecutors to pursue. One would be based on the negligent use of a firearm. An alternative is to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Baldwin caused Hutchins’ death without “due caution” or “circumspection,” also defined as “an act committed with total disregard or indifference for the safety of others.”

Defense attorneys also say prosecutors steered the grand jury away from testimony by witnesses including the film's director, as well as assistant director and safety coordinator Dave Halls and props master Sarah Zachry. Halls last year pleaded no contest to negligent handling of a firearm and completed a sentence of six months of unsupervised probation.

The two-week trial of Gutierrez-Reed gave attorneys for Baldwin and the public an unusual window into how the actor's own trial could unfold.

Baldwin figured prominently in testimony and closing arguments that highlighted his authority as a co-producer and the lead actor on “Rust.” Both the prosecution and defense in Gutierrez-Reed’s trial dissected video footage of Baldwin before the fatal shooting for clues about breakdowns in firearms safety.

Prosecutors said Gutierrez-Reed unwittingly brought live ammunition onto the set of “Rust,” where it was expressly prohibited and failed to follow basic gun safety protocols.

Gutierrez-Reed is appealing the conviction, decided by a jury in March, to a higher court but hasn’t yet filed detailed arguments. At sentencing, Gutierrez-Reed told the judge she tried to do her best on the set despite not having “proper time, resources and staffing.”

After the shooting in New Mexico, the filming of “Rust” resumed in Montana, under an agreement with Hutchins’ husband, Matthew Hutchins, which made him an executive producer. Matthew Hutchins and the Hutchins' son settled a wrongful death lawsuit in civil court under undisclosed terms.

Defense attorneys said Baldwin was offered a deal last year to plead to a “minor offense” before a grand jury was convened, but the offer was "inexplicably retracted" before the deadline to respond.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Top Picks