All vehicles will be required to have enhanced automated emergency braking by 2029

emorphy

Posts: 70   +1
Staff
The big picture: The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's new automatic emergency braking rule requires automakers to develop and equip vehicles with technology that is currently unavailable. Consumer advocates question whether automakers have enough time, given the five-year window, to develop this technology and ensure it meets rigorous testing standards.

The NHTSA, a branch of the US Department of Transportation, issued a final rule late last month mandating automatic emergency braking (AEB), including pedestrian AEB, as standard on all passenger cars, SUVs, and light trucks by September 2029.

The catch is that the current technology does not meet the standard set by the NHTSA, which expects these systems to be capable of braking at speeds of up to 62 miles per hour and detecting pedestrians in both daylight and darkness – effectively raising the speed and nighttime requirements beyond the capabilities of available technology. However, the safety agency notes that some vehicles currently available offer this "maturing technology" as an add-on feature.

Automatic emergency braking "is now so advanced that we're requiring these systems to be even more effective at higher speeds and to detect pedestrians," said NHTSA Deputy Administrator Sophie Shulman. "Most new vehicles already come with AEB, and we expect that many cars and light trucks will be able to meet this standard ahead of the deadline, meaning even more lives will be saved thanks to this technology."

According to the NHTSA, an AEB system utilizes various sensor technologies and subsystems that collaborate to detect when a vehicle is about to crash, automatically applying the brakes if the driver has not done so or applying additional force to supplement the driver's braking.

The NHTSA emphasizes the importance of this standard for safety, anticipating that it will annually save at least 360 lives, prevent at least 24,000 injuries, and save more than $5 billion each year in property damage.

Testing by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, however, shows that the current crop of vehicles is not addressing crash scenarios very effectively. The institute recently updated its vehicle-to-vehicle front crash prevention test to address crashes occurring at higher speeds, and only one of the first 10 small SUVs evaluated earned a good rating (it was the Subaru Forester, in case you are wondering). The updated test includes trials run at 31, 37, and 43 mph, as well as other scenarios, and incorporates both forward collision warning and AEB systems.

The IIHS has high hopes for the new standard set by NHTSA. "I think the automakers are in a good position to respond to this new regulation," said David Zuby, chief research officer at IIHS. "What's tricky about the regulation is that it does now sort of raise the bar for the level of performance that [NHTSA] is asking for from these systems."

William Wallace, associate director of safety policy at Consumer Reports, points out that many automakers already have to comply with stricter European regulations. "Already in the last few years, AEB technology has improved significantly. It will continue to improve, especially given the opportunity to have five years for implementation," he said.

It is evident, however, that automakers will have to make additional investments in their existing AEB technology. Automatic braking systems relying on traditional cameras are usually less effective at night, especially with respect to pedestrians. "There are various advances in the marketplace and various technologies that could be used in order to improve the performance of these systems," Wallace said.

Using lidar sensors instead of radar and camera detection or employing thermal technology to detect body heat are among the suggested improvements. The final rule also mandates that vehicles pass a series of tests to prevent false activation of the AEB systems, which could also add to the cost for automakers.

Last month, NHTSA upgraded a probe into Honda Motor Co. vehicles due to reports of unexpected activation of emergency braking. The NHTSA had received 2,876 consumer complaints, and reports of 93 injury incidents and 47 crashes linked to the defect.

Permalink to story:

 
Day by day these ***** law makers are trying to kill us off... What about with natural selection? Darwin law is the law! WTF! By making these legislations society will become more and more stupid=dangerous to others! it ain't right folks!
 
Last edited:
Day by day these ***** law makers are trying to kill us off... What about with natural selection? Darwin law is the law! WTF! By making these legislations society will become more and more stupid=dangerous to others! it ain't right folks!
I recognize the sarcasm, but there is such a thing as a system not being ready for prime time, and thus causing more accidents than it prevents. And even barring that, there is the cost factor to consider. What good is the technology, if it adds so much to the purchase price that most people can't afford it, and thus stick to even-more dangerous and polluting 20+ year old models?

It's already possible to build vehicles that would eliminate more than 99% of accident fatalities. Such cars would cost several million dollars each, be far too large to fit in normal garages or parking spaces, and get about 4 mpg. Should the government mandate those?

The real sticking point in these regulations is the requirement for pedestrian AEB. In 2023 I purchased the best autonomous package available and it's quite 'spotty', to say the least, in spotting pedestrians.
 
If and when these new standards are achieved it will allow more smartphone zombies to wander about not looking where they are going, and start a new craze among da mo' troublesome yoof of jumping in front of cars on purpose just to see the car hit the brakes hard.
 
Oh the slip & fall lawyers will have a field day with this.
Someone rear ends a vehicle, the owners will sue the
manufacturers "but it was suppose to brake on its own".

Just think how much less expensive vehicle would be, if they didn't have all these
electronic do-dads. Not only that, how less it would cost to repair!
 
There are at least 10 million people that can barely afford cheapest cars without enhanced crap in this country.
Why do they not require new features together with giving some road fees discount or wavers for this category?
Is it because poor people should use public transit instead of owning their old polluting piece of junk?
 
While it's a good idea it also guarantee's we will never again have a reasonably priced car that everyone can afford, or maybe that's the objective .... if nobody can drive there won't be any accidents .....
 
This is a VERY misleading article. "... to develop and equip vehicles with technology that is currently unavailable."

Strange, because here's a list of some cars that commonly come equipped with Automatic Emergency Braking (AEB) as either a standard feature or an available option:

  1. Toyota Corolla
  2. Honda Accord
  3. Subaru Forester
  4. Ford Fusion
  5. Volvo XC90
  6. BMW 3 Series
  7. Audi A4
  8. Mercedes-Benz E-Class
  9. Volkswagen Golf
  10. Tesla Model 3

But what's interesting are all the nay sayers. I bet they said the same about: ABS, lead-free gas, seat belts, ANY safety feature in any car, Daytime Driving lights, etc.

Remember kids, any new technology is immediately suspicious and should be disregarded out of hand - and before doing some research!!
 
The new AEB regulation is a positive step for road safety, with potential to save lives. However, requiring advanced tech within a short timeframe might be challenging for automakers. Balancing development, testing, and cost will be crucial.
 
More bandaids for driver inability, inattentiveness, and ignorance. How about better educating new drivers and having testing that isn't a joke instead of mandating systems that won't be ready for prime time for 10-20 years at best? Police and other officials love to trot out 'driving is a privilege' all the time, but then hand out licenses like they're Cracker Jack prizes. Every automatic braking system I've ever been around was only useful for avoiding low speed rear end collisions at best.
 
Last edited:
This is a VERY misleading article. "... to develop and equip vehicles with technology that is currently unavailable."

Strange, because here's a list of some cars that commonly come equipped with Automatic Emergency Braking (AEB) as either a standard feature or an available option:
Why not read the articles before replying to them? The "tech that isn't available" is, while traveling at 62mph, to detect both vehicles and pedestrians -- in light or dark conditions -- and successfully avoid a collision. Current AEB systems don't come close to this level of effectiveness.
 
Last edited:
Didn't think about it that way....get surrounded by a group of people because you accidently turned the wrong way....


That would scary as hell. Car just breaks and you can't escape.
Yeah, but probably in that situation, better that the car prevents you from moving than you end up committing manslaughter because you didn't follow traffic directions. Hopefully the crowd would understand and you'd just be stuck for awhile.
 
This is a VERY misleading article. "... to develop and equip vehicles with technology that is currently unavailable."

Strange, because here's a list of some cars that commonly come equipped with Automatic Emergency Braking (AEB) as either a standard feature or an available option:

  1. Toyota Corolla
  2. Honda Accord
  3. Subaru Forester
  4. Ford Fusion
  5. Volvo XC90
  6. BMW 3 Series
  7. Audi A4
  8. Mercedes-Benz E-Class
  9. Volkswagen Golf
  10. Tesla Model 3

But what's interesting are all the nay sayers. I bet they said the same about: ABS, lead-free gas, seat belts, ANY safety feature in any car, Daytime Driving lights, etc.

Remember kids, any new technology is immediately suspicious and should be disregarded out of hand - and before doing some research!!
I'm not sure what is so hard to understand about the regulation mandating *improved* AEB that *goes beyond* what current AEB systems can do.

Similar to how Teslas have *limited* automated driving but not *completely automated* driving. They are different levels of the same general technology so paying attention to nuance is important.

Remember kids, any new tech is fun and exciting, but sometimes the cost of the new tech is not worth the benefit of the new tech. The field of study devoted to this is called Economics and it is surprisingly underrated by armchair experts.
 
Yeah, but probably in that situation, better that the car prevents you from moving than you end up committing manslaughter because you didn't follow traffic directions. Hopefully the crowd would understand and you'd just be stuck for awhile.
Not with mob mentality. They were trying to get his door open and pull him out, clearly can be seen towards the start of the clip. He didn't know there was a protest, mistakenly turned that way with no intent to cause harm and he wanted to get out of their way. Put in a system to automatically stop when a pedestrian is in your way and there's no escape from that situation. Granted this is not a common thing, but who would be to blame if he couldn't escape and was hurt or killed because of it?
 
Back