New charging algorithm could double life of li-ion batteries

Alfonso Maruccia

Posts: 1,006   +301
Staff
Forward-looking: Despite being one of the most practical and effective technologies for storing and delivering electric energy, lithium-ion batteries have started to show their limits. Scientists are looking for alternative materials and energy storage solutions, but researchers now say they can make li-ion batteries work better and for extended periods.

A team of European researchers from Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin (HZB) and Humboldt University in Berlin developed an alternative charging solution to make li-ion batteries last much longer than they do now. The study shows that batteries become more resilient and retain a higher energy capacity after hundreds of discharge-recharge cycles by changing how the charger delivers current to electrolyte materials.

Lithium-ion batteries are compact, robust energy containers that have become ubiquitous. Electric vehicles and electronic devices rely on them, but their capacity gradually degrades as electrolytes pass through the membrane that separates the anode and cathode. The best commercial-grade lithium-ion batteries available use electrodes made of a compound known as NMC532 and graphite, and they provide a service life of up to 8 years.

Conventional charging uses a constant current (CC) of external electric energy. The study analyzed what happened to battery samples when using the CC charging and discovered that the anode's solid electrolyte interface (SEI) was "significantly thicker." Furthermore, they found more cracks in the NMC532 and graphite electrode structures.

A thicker SEI and more cracks in the electrodes mean a significant loss of capacity for the li-ion batteries. So, the researchers developed a charging protocol based on pulsed current (PC). After charging the batteries with the new PC protocol, the team discovered that the SEI interface was much thinner, and the electrode materials underwent fewer structural changes.

The team used two of Europe's leading synchrotron facilities for particle acceleration, "BESSY II" and "PETRA III," to conduct the pulsed-current recharging experiments. They discovered that PC charging promotes the "homogeneous distribution" of lithium ions in the graphite, which reduces mechanical stress and cracking in the graphite particles. The protocol can also suppress structural degradation in the NMC532 cathode.

The study shows that high-frequency pulsing with square-wave current produced the best results. The tests show that PC charging can double the service life of commercial li-ion batteries with an 80 percent capacity retention.

"Pulsed charging could bring many advantages in terms of the stability of the electrode materials and the interfaces and significantly extend the service life of batteries," said TU Berlin professor Dr. Julia Kowal, co-author of the study.

Permalink to story:

 
That is pretty nifty, though I wonder how it would interact with electric cars using other battery chemistries - lithium iron phosphate batteries are becoming a lot more common, for example, and some Chinese EVs are now rolling out with sodium-ion batteries. Though I suppose "charging style" could be added as something the charger and car communicate to each other for different kinds of batteries.
 
When I was on the road 25 years ago, I used to re-charge AA alkaline batteries for my sony walkman . with some cheap chinese charger. Actually worked ok, was super careful , had it in a safe space, never left it unattended. So imagine though not necessary, with right tech you probably could charge an Alkaline pretty well.
Also when I used rechargeables , the smarter stations , could refresh to some degree , recover dead batteries to some degree. So not surprising still learning stuff. Also with greater knowledge it works both ways , ie can physically tweak the battery build to optimise this.

Plus though people here hate telemetry, the likes of Tesla, Apple must have a huge amount of knowledge. I'm sure Apple knows how to tank your battery
 
I'd love to extend the lifespan of my LFP solar batteries... How do we get this up and running on an Deye inverter? I'd also like longer life from my phone - until security updates end.
 
When I was on the road 25 years ago, I used to re-charge AA alkaline batteries for my sony walkman . with some cheap chinese charger. Actually worked ok, was super careful , had it in a safe space, never left it unattended. So imagine though not necessary, with right tech you probably could charge an Alkaline pretty well.
Also when I used rechargeables , the smarter stations , could refresh to some degree , recover dead batteries to some degree. So not surprising still learning stuff. Also with greater knowledge it works both ways , ie can physically tweak the battery build to optimise this.

Plus though people here hate telemetry, the likes of Tesla, Apple must have a huge amount of knowledge. I'm sure Apple knows how to tank your battery

Ah, I remember the old alkaline chargers. Had one of those for my walkman/diskman growing up.

Looking back on it I suppose it was sorta sketchy tech, but worked better than Ni-Cad rechargables at the time.
 
That is pretty nifty, though I wonder how it would interact with electric cars using other battery chemistries - lithium iron phosphate batteries are becoming a lot more common, for example
According to the research, pulse charging would benefit any battery chemisty based on graphite anodes, so LiFePo batteries would qualify as well.

One interesting fact I noted from the source paper itself (not mentioned in any of the popular articles about it) is that a pulse frequency of 2khz+ is required for maximum benefit. In practice, this would mean slightly less efficient charging due to inductive losses ... not a big deal for a phone or laptop, but moreso for EVs.
 
According to the research, pulse charging would benefit any battery chemisty based on graphite anodes, so LiFePo batteries would qualify as well.

One interesting fact I noted from the source paper itself (not mentioned in any of the popular articles about it) is that a pulse frequency of 2khz+ is required for maximum benefit. In practice, this would mean slightly less efficient charging due to inductive losses ... not a big deal for a phone or laptop, but moreso for EVs.
I think a lot of EV owners would trade slightly less effective charging if it meant doubling the life expectancy of the car's battery, considering what a major failure point that part is.
 
I have long wondered why EV cars like Tesla, to promote long battery life, have that built-in protection where you don't over charge (mostly you only charge to around 80 percent or so, if I recall) or under charge your battery, yet cell phones happily let you charge to 100 percent, or down to 0%.

I appreciate the idea behind this research (new ways to look at recharging). I wonder how willing device makers will be to implement tech that makes their devices last longer.
 
Back