FPS and your eyes: Some people can process visual information faster than others

Shawn Knight

Posts: 15,263   +192
Staff member
In brief: Researchers from Trinity College Dublin have determined that visual perception in humans – that is, how many "images per second" we can process – varies greatly from person to person. It could explain why, disregarding physical traits, one individual thrives in high-paced activities while another falters.

The researchers devised an experiment involving a flickering light to gauge individual ability. The test involved 80 men and women between the ages of 18 and 35, and measured the point at which the light no longer flickered and appeared as a constant.

Results showed that while some people could no longer detect flickering at 35 flashes per second, others could still detect flickering at more than 60 times per second. For comparison, some predatory birds such as the peregrine falcon can process at up to 100 visual frames per second.

Clinton Haarlem, a PhD candidate at Trinity College Dublin, said they believe folks that can see flickering at higher rates have access to a little more visual information per timeframe than people on the lower end of the spectrum.

Professor Kevin Mitchell, a neurobiologist who supervised the research, noted that because we only have access to our own subjective experience, we naively expect that everyone else perceives the world in the same way we do.

"This study characterizes one such difference," Mitchell said, adding that some people really do see the world faster than others.

Data further revealed little difference between visual temporal resolution of men and women, and that ability seemed stable over time within individuals. Previous research had indicated that the trait does diminish with age, and that it dips temporarily following an intense workout.

It's unclear how visual perception speed impacts day to day life, but it's easy to see how it would give pro athletes or even competitive gamers a leg up on "slower" competition. We also don't yet know the extent to which the trait is trainable. Does practice make perfect, or is this more a thing that you're either born with or you aren't?

The team's results have been published in the journal Plos One.

Image credit: Chris Peeters, Yan Krukau

Permalink to story.

 
It's a small sample, but still fascinating! Would be interesting to see if this affects people's preferences for high refresh monitors.
 
Is it trainable? It's just like actually being fast. You can teach a fast person to run a little faster but you can't just teach speed to someone that isn't naturally fast.
 
Some people have better vision and can see greater distances than others. They made great fighter pilots. I don't see how this current study is remarkable in any way.
 
That's probably part of the reason why I excelled at batting for playing baseball. Watch the ball leave the pitcher's hand and be able to see how it's spinning to help determine what kind of pitch you were going up against when it's traveling upwards of 90+ mph in about a 61ft distance from the pitcher to the catcher. I'm sure this was a mix of natural ability and lots of practice. Some guys I played with couldn't tell a fast ball from a curve or slider, they just swung and hoped they'd make contact.

After I stopped playing baseball and having been at least 1 full year of not having swung at a pitch, I was bored and went to the local batting cages. I stepped into the fast pitch (throwing roughly 85-90mph) and those pitches zipped by me so fast that I was behind on my swings. It felt comical with how slow I was with my swing. I had to step into the medium speed (roughly 65-70mph) and practice hitting there before I started getting back into it. Went back to the fast speed machine and started making contact.

But that was years ago. I probably couldn't spot the difference anymore for a couple of reason:
1) age - it's been 25 years since I played
2) very much out of practice
I don't know if I'd even feel comfortable standing at the plate with someone humming pitches down it 90+mph anymore.

As for FPS, it's never bothered me. I played around 30-45fps for many years (due to hardware limitations) on my PC and I never cared. I can clearly tell the difference between 30 and 60fps when changing between them, but anything over 60fps and I don't think I'd notice.

I guess it could depend not just on a person-by-person basis, but also what they are doing and how it impacts them.
 
Some people have better vision and can see greater distances than others. They made great fighter pilots. I don't see how this current study is remarkable in any way.
This is "framerate" instead of "resolution." It has not previously been established the rate at which visual information is processed. This is DIFFERENT from clarity.
 
Back