Voice of common citizens will be suppressed, it does not mean democracy

The important argument given in its argument in the supreme court was related to the common citizens. During the hearing, senior lawyer Kapil Sibal said - Whoever gives money, the government will also work for him, then what will happen to the common citizens? If this process is transparent, the dominance of the corporate sector will be reduced. prashant bhushan gave the example of Jayantilal Ranchoddas Koticha vs Tata iron case in the court. In this case, Justice Chhangla had commented that making political contributions does not serve the interests of a separate legal entity, but rather serves the interests of its agents.

Advocate Nizam Pasha said in his argument that donations are taken from Chinese companies through electoral bonds, but they are not allowed to manufacture them. What kind of rule is this? If there is a ban on manufacturing, then donations from Chinese companies should also be banned. bhushan also filed a letter from the reserve bank of india in the court in support of this argument, in which it was said that with the introduction of electoral bonds, money from shell companies will be easily available to political parties in the form of donations.