Australia has been facing heat over the double standards it has shown in this edition of ICC World Cup. Australia's star Steve Smith has said the decision to let the team play Afghanistan in a crunch World Cup match was "above my pay-grade." Earlier this year, CA scrapped a three-match one-day international series against Afghanistan on the grounds of Taliban.
Reuters
Australia star Steve Smith said the decision to let the team play Afghanistan in a crunch World Cup match was "above my pay-grade" as Cricket Australia faced accusations of "double-standards".
Earlier this year, CA scrapped a three-match one-day international series against Afghanistan on the grounds the Taliban, who regained power in 2021, had placed fresh limits on education and work opportunities for Afghan women and girls, including female cricketers.
In the run-up to Tuesday's high-stakes match in Mumbai, Afghanistan fast bowler Naveen-ul-Haq took to social media to suggest there was an element of hypocrisy in CA abandoning the one-day games but going ahead with a World Cup match where it had something to lose.
"Refusing to play the bilateral series, now it will be interesting to see cricket Australia stand in the World Cup #standards #human rights or 2 points," Naveen wrote on Instagram.
Former Australia captain Smith, however, told a pre-match press conference at Mumbai's Wankhede Stadium on Monday: "We obviously played against Afghanistan in the T20 World Cup at home recently and we're playing tomorrow (Tuesday) so it's not a question for me, it's far above my pay grade."
Cricket Australia had earlier responded to Naveen's post, with a spokesperson telling News Corp Australia: "CA made the decision not to proceed with the three match ODI series against Afghanistan in March following the announcement by the Taliban of further restrictions on women's rights including education and employment opportunities and the access to parks and gymnasiums.
"There is a distinction between playing bilateral series against Afghanistan which falls under CA control as compared to playing in a World Cup tournament which is an ICC (International Cricket Council) event and subject to their regulations."
Tuesday's World Cup match has plenty of significance for both sides, with emerging nation Afghanistan still in contention for a semi-final place after winning four of their seven pool matches so far during the tournament.
Meanwhile five-time champions Australia still need to win one of their final two group games, against Afghanistan and Bangladesh, to secure a place in the knockout stage.
There have been boycotts and walkovers at previous World Cups, with both Australia and the West Indies forfeiting matches in Sri Lanka during the 1996 edition on security grounds.
England also refused to play a match against 2003 co-hosts Zimbabwe, citing safety concerns, with the lost points contributing to their early exit from that edition.
jdg/dj
Experience Your Economic Times Newspaper, The Digital Way!
The Indian market has outperformed the rest of Asia Pacific including China for some of the biggest global consumer goods companies in the past quarter, according to their post-earnings management commentaries.
While the recent debate on 70-hour work weeks has been polarizing, data shows employee productivity of India Inc — measured as revenue per employee — has steadily gone up in the past five years, even as staff cost as a proportion of total revenues has largely been maintained at 10%.
The government banned 22 illegal betting and gambling apps and websites, including the controversial app Mahadev Book Online, which is at the centre of bribery allegations against Chhattisgarh chief minister Bhupesh Baghel.