EDV: Pricing-In Long-Term Inflation Of 3-4%, Lowering Downside Risk (Rating Upgrade)

Summary

  • Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury Index Fund ETF has lost half its value since early 2020 due to rising inflation and a positive stock-bond correlation, as I expected then.
  • EDV's losses have accelerated this year with the yield curve's abnormally steepening pattern.
  • The rise in the long end of the yield curve and the potential for an inflationary recession are vital factors affecting EDV's performance.
  • EDV is now pricing for 3-4% inflation over the next two decades, a reasonable assumption given debt issues and demographic trends.
  • The ETF could rebound if long-term rates peak and decline, but runaway inflation risks, debt monetization, and geopolitical strains could cause further decline.

Time is money, value of asset growth over time, financial concept : US USD dollar with a stopwatch, depicting investors deposit or invest for future income or increasing profit in high yield bonds.

William_Potter

Over the past two and a half years, I have had a relatively consistent bearish outlook on the long-term bond market. Initially, in early 2020, this outlook was due to my view that inflation would rise, causing the stock-bond correlation

This article was written by

Harrison is a financial analyst who has been writing on Seeking Alpha since 2018 and has closely followed the market for over a decade. He has professional experience in the private equity, real estate, and economic research industry. Harrison also has an academic background in financial econometrics, economic forecasting, and global monetary economics.

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

Recommended For You

Comments (4)

c
I just glanced over the increasing inflation target article that you linked budgetmodel.wharton.upenn.edu/...
so my apologies if there is something in the article that I missed. But the prevailing opinion last time I checked, which also makes logical sense, is that increasing inflation targets would have nothing more than a one-time fiscal effect, which would make this an utterly foolish and short-sighted effort. It would undermine market participants' trust in any inflation target in the future, and by implication make debt cost for the government more expensive possibly for eternity, after that one-time relief fizzles out.
You cannot create wealth by one-time surprise effects; you can just fool those who trusted the institutions of our country, and re-shuffle money from bondholders to the government and possibly to equity holders; and you can only do that one time.
c
"If we assume that bonds "should" pay 1-2% over inflation in the long run (a historical norm), and EDV's yield is currently ~5%, then EDV is essentially pricing in 3-4% inflation over the next 25 years." - I'm not following your logic. Expected inflation is relatively directly observable through TIPS or inflation swaps. Also, you are ignoring the term premium in your math - market expected inflation is nominal treasury yield minus TIPS yield minus the inflation-related part of the term premium, right?

Your statement in the subsequent paragraph "That could be achieved by allowing inflation to remain slightly elevated for many years, which would be relatively neutral for EDV, given it effectively discounting prolonged 3-4% inflation" would then also be a wrong conclusion because of the wrong premise.

On an unrelated note, technologic progress like EVs, self-driving cars, autonomous transportation of goods, robotics, and AI may have a deflationary effect (less demand for labor, etc.). There are many different forces at play. Inflation is notoriously hard to predict - I think even many self-proclaimed "experts" agree with that.
Also, compare Japan's demographics and debt load to that of the U.S. It looks like in Japan those factors might have led to deflationary tendencies.
c
I read somewhere else that the Fed really only can and only tries to fight demand-side inflation, not supply-side inflation which are supposedly not related to money supply, and is not really under the Fed's or our country's control (e.g. imported commodities), if I understand it right. Can you please elaborate or clarify this?
c
"I expect long-term inflation will continue to rise fundamentally due to debt and demographics" - There is another theory that predicts deflationary pressure due to demographics (see Japan).
Disagree with this article? Submit your own. To report a factual error in this article, . Your feedback matters to us!

About EDV

SymbolLast Price% Chg
Expense Ratio
Div Frequency
Div Rate (TTM)
Yield (TTM)
Assets (AUM)
Compare to Peers

More on EDV

Related Stocks

SymbolLast Price% Chg
EDV
--