Entering text into the input field will update the search result below

KMLM: Meeting All The High Expectations

Radar Insights profile picture
Radar Insights
603 Followers

Summary

  • Trend following (managed futures) performs well in the long run, with less risk, and offers crisis alpha during equity downturns.
  • The KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF tracks the Mount Lucas Index and provides diversification benefits thanks to its low correlation to other asset classes.
  • KMLM has performed well since its inception in 2022, outperforming the S&P 500 while offering lower risk and drawdowns.

Trends 2023 Word in White Sticky Note on Blue Cardboard Background

phototechno/iStock via Getty Images

Trend following (or managed futures) performs in the long run as well as equities, but with less risk. It also offers crisis alpha: it performs very well when equities tumble. On top of that come the diversification benefits; managed futures have a

This article was written by

Radar Insights profile picture
603 Followers
Hi, I’m a private investor and a teacher. I like to program and the stock markets are a fertile playground for data analysis and visualisation and this helps me take well-informed decisions.

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, but may initiate a beneficial Long position through a purchase of the stock, or the purchase of call options or similar derivatives in KMLM over the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

Recommended For You

Comments (5)

k
Long KMLM.

Good data and commentary.
Lake OZ boater profile picture
Good article, thanks. For supplemental reading on KMLM...

pictureperfectportfolios.com/...

Disclosure: I am long KMLM
M
MMShaw
Yesterday, 11:05 PM
@Lake OZ boater what percentage of your portfolio do you allocate to managed futures ? And do you use managed futures as a substitute for bonds or in addition to them? Opinions that I read are all over the place on this. Thanks.
Lake OZ boater profile picture
@MMShaw "What percentage of your portfolio do you allocate to managed futures ?

It's hard to find a consensus on this. FWIW...I have allocated about 10%. I am a pre-retiree.

It may come down to what you are comfortable with after your due dilgence. Five (5%) doesn't seem like enough to move the needle, but for me anyway, 20% seemed too much. (see AQR study below)

Something to think about that is often said by the Convexity Maven, Harley Bassman... "For most investments, sizing is more important than entry level."

The long-term expected return for managed futures (if you tend to line-item) seems to be somewhere in the neighborhood of bonds. I adhere to MPT, so I don't care what KMLM does in isolation.

The history of this type of alternative investment seems to suggest there can be very long stretches in which it will do almost nothing. The term often used to describe this alternative investment is "crisis alpha." Crises don't happen that often, so many investors grow impatient when everything is great and walk away.

KMLM is not correlated to stocks nor bonds, so it did very well in 2022. It really helped mitigate drawdowns of standard stock/bond portfolios.

FYI... During your due diligence, you may want to read this paper by AQR researchers which is based on 100 years of trend-following. (Since 1880) .

Here's what they concluded "trend-following" brought to the performance of the standard 60/40 portfolio. (e.g. around a 20% allocation).

-2% higher annual return

- 2% lower annual volatility

(-50%) peak decline in the Great Depression versus (-62%) for a 60/40 versus (-87%) for 100% stocks.

deliverypdf.ssrn.com/...

Hope this might be helpful.
M
@Lake OZ boater This is extremely helpful. Thank you. I always read your comments because emotion does not enter into your decision-making process and that is what trips up many investors.

The negative comments I read about managed futures nearly always involve the long periods of lackluster performance but this recency bias is a portfolio killer and the ability/inability to stick with an investment plan through thick and thin is the key to long-term returns. I view managed futures like insurance; yeah it’s a drag to pay the premiums but it certainly is good to have it when you need it. I went for 40 years without an automobile claim then had 3 within 5 years (not my fault ;-).

Another question; do you have any other managed futures in your portfolio other than KMLM such as DBMF or CTA or do you stick strictly with KMLM? I’ve noticed that the ETFs in this space have lower management fees than the traditional mutual funds.

Thanks again for sharing your insights with me.
Disagree with this article? Submit your own. To report a factual error in this article, . Your feedback matters to us!
To ensure this doesn’t happen in the future, please enable Javascript and cookies in your browser.
Is this happening to you frequently? Please report it on our feedback forum.
If you have an ad-blocker enabled you may be blocked from proceeding. Please disable your ad-blocker and refresh.