Entering text into the input field will update the search result below

J. M. Smucker: Not A Sweet Deal

Summary

  • The J. M. Smucker Company pursued an expensive deal for Hostess, raising questions about leverage and growth.
  • The acquisition of Hostess Brands for $5.6 billion has led to concerns about overpayment and high leverage.
  • Given these dynamics, I fear J. M. Smucker prospects here, even as current earnings multiples do not look too demanding.
  • Looking for a helping hand in the market? Members of Value In Corporate Events get exclusive ideas and guidance to navigate any climate. Learn More »

Group of business people holding a jigsaw puzzle pieces.

courtneyk

In February of this year I concluded that I was losing my taste in the case of The J. M. Smucker Company (NYSE:SJM). Shares enjoyed a re-rating since the pandemic, yet this re-rating left shares more

If you like to see more ideas, please subscribe to the premium service "Value in Corporate Events" here and try the free trial. In this service we cover major earnings events, M&A, IPOs and other significant corporate events with actionable ideas. Furthermore, we provide coverage of situations and names on request!

This article was written by

The Value Investor profile picture
24.49K Followers
The writer is a long term value investor and M.Sc graduate in Financial Markets with over 10 years experience. Value can be found in both long and short ideas and uses options to enhance the risk-return profile of investment ideas. Disclaimer: This article provides opinions and information, but does not contain recommendations or personal investment advice to any specific person for any particular purpose. Do your own research or obtain suitable personal advice.

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

Recommended For You

Comments (5)

s
sdavid04191
Yesterday, 8:02 PM
If had MDLZ and PEP and SJM for quite some time. Plenty of people are still gouging on junk food and the above companies reports have shown a steady growth as they reach evolving markets. That said, I believe they paid too much and any benefit from this move is years away.
Pragmatic ENTJ profile picture
They most certainly overpaid. And they overpaid for a company that produces junk food that will be banned at some point in the not too distant future.
Bim Ska La Bim profile picture
Not the best acquisition.
i
ihookem
Yesterday, 6:07 PM
I think today was another over reaction that caused many " investors" to follow the herd over the cliff. It is sad to think such irrational people will just sell off cause they think they know something. SJM has been a good company for 100 yrs . I doubt they bombed out with this purchase . Lie Verbum said, they can use their own fillings and likely make the snacks at a cheaper price, than Hostess.
Verbum Sap Sat profile picture
Im not going to disagree with your thesis for the Hostess purchase. It is up to Smucker to somehow realize more synergies once it closes on the acquisition. I personally see new organic growth coming from the combined companies where Smucker introduces jam filled treats using its preserves etc.
Disagree with this article? Submit your own. To report a factual error in this article, . Your feedback matters to us!
To ensure this doesn’t happen in the future, please enable Javascript and cookies in your browser.
Is this happening to you frequently? Please report it on our feedback forum.
If you have an ad-blocker enabled you may be blocked from proceeding. Please disable your ad-blocker and refresh.