Entering text into the input field will update the search result below

Retirement Passive Income: Why Enterprise Products Partners Is The Best

Summary

  • There are four major requirements that retirees typically look for in an investment.
  • EPD checks each of those boxes with flying colors.
  • We share why EPD is the ideal retirement passive income investment.
  • Looking for a portfolio of ideas like this one? Members of High Yield Investor get exclusive access to our subscriber-only portfolios. Learn More »

Concept of a credit vacation Concept travel One hundred dollar

NosUA

Retirees looking for passive income investments generally need securities that offer each of the following characteristics:

  1. A sufficiently high current yield to cover living expenses.
  2. A safe enough distribution to sustain the payouts through good times and bad.

If you want full access to our Portfolio and all our current Top Picks, feel free to join us at High Yield Investor for a 2-week free trial

We are the #1-rated high-yield investor community on Seeking Alpha with 1,500+ members on board and a perfect 5/5 rating from 150+ reviews:

You won't be charged a penny during the free trial, so you have nothing to lose and everything to gain.

Start Your 2-Week Free Trial Today!


This article was written by

Samuel Smith profile picture
22.8K Followers

Samuel Smith is Vice President at Leonberg Capital and manages the High Yield Investor Seeking Alpha Investing Group.


Samuel is a Professional Engineer and Project Management Professional by training and holds a B.S. in Civil Engineering and Mathematics from the United States Military Academy at West Point and a Masters in Engineering from Texas A&M with a focus on Computational Engineering and Mathematics. He is a former Army officer, land development project engineer, and lead investment analyst at Sure Dividend.

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have a beneficial long position in the shares of EPD either through stock ownership, options, or other derivatives. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

Recommended For You

Comments (25)

J
Glad to see you cover EPD as Well as ET. I came up with an analogy that I think fits the difference in approach of the 2 Safest Midstream Companies.
First the thing that makes them safer is large family Control even our wonderful WES has some Roll Up Risk, the General Partner interest are similar to our needs how they get there is a reflection of Mr. Duncan and Mr. Warren and the way they set up the Company to fit themselves.
Mr. Duncan was a strategist with the planning and forward thinking to grow
long term projects and put in place Management to execute with precision.
That’s the culture today as new paid as built facilities come on line as planned.
My analogy for EPD is the MegaMind.
Mr Warren was much more the WildCatter and put growth at all cost first. This approach has them carrying more and less safe debt and their approach has of necessity become absorption so my analogy is The Blob as they grow by
merger versus purchase or long term projects not that either Company can’t do some of both by inherent personality this is the way forward each is growing.
We deliberately made EPD the centerpiece of our withdrawal to Cash Flow investing and safety; ET we were absorbed when our large ENBL holding became ET in December 21. Immediately making them our number two holding.
When our PSXP was rolled up, then our number three we immediately lost Cash Flow and became dividend Income we eventually traded one Share of PSX for
4.1 EPD immediately doubled our Cash Flow and returned it to Return of Capital enhancing its value even more.
This elevated WES to our number 3 and we have found by accident that is a good number of MLP’S to care for and grow consistently Compounding keeps our Basis safe way beyond Step Up Basis time. One of the major values of safe MLP investing. The difference in growth allowed by Return of Capital versus dividends is simply huge. For example we hit 17.2% increased Cash Flow YTD and still took out a lot of Cash for Property Tax this quarter. 4% Rule is of no interest to us growing our Income is. We are fortunate to be able to own safe MLP’S. Rule of 72 Compounding is extremely powerful.
Best Luck to Everyone
John
webicknell profile picture
Wish I had more... Own 1700 EPD (10.7% yield on basis) and 700 MPLX (10.9% yield on basis).... Will buy more on dips.
v
Just using the word 'very' some often diminishes the meaning of the word...glta
John R. Clark profile picture
Good morning. At our house I apply my own 5% rule in defiance of convention. It goes like this ---

1. My wife and I draw 5% per year when we want to from our income portfolio's net worth, knowing that its yield well exceeds that in most years. (Net worth = its market value on any day less total debt, and NOT counting physical assets or cashables outside this one set. That is my definition of functional net worth.)

2. When yield falls short, we cut back our draws and fund any deficit from our stable reserves --- to be replenished after a time of high yield again.

3. We keep a budget and seek to beat it in small ways daily, so that we don't "must" draw the full .05 just to pay rent and milk, but can spend less than that liberally with purpose and never run short --- usually.

4. We view ourselves as capable of making a 20- year portfolio last forever, with proper use and tending plus separate recourses in case of guessing far wrong.

I would encourage future retirees to build an income portfolio steadily, considering along the way its dependable annual yield over, say, 50 years. Of course that is impossible to guess very right, but you needn't figure it all out once and forever. Just work on growing your income base by adding more each payday and reinvesting your returns. Give it ever more to work with!

The more thrift and good sense you learn with your wages, salary & etc. , now, the easier to enjoy an abundance in your goldenest decades.

Mr. Smith's top pick today looks like a worthy member of any portfolio, given its respectable yield and sterling long- term record.

Disclosures: 1) Here, our social securitys and a pension provide more than half our income so we find it easy to do on less than our 5% at all times. 2) In 2043 our combined ages will equal 188 years, or not. 3) My wife and I don't pay rent or drink much milk. 4) We keep other financial recourses not elaborated here, in case of having overrated ourselves in all else.

TWI-UDI, remember --- This Works If yoU Do It. Thanks for reading, all!
d
As far as stocks being able to hold their gains throughout a trading session, this one isn’t worth a stick. Always fades hard into the close.
V
You can sleep well at night with this one...I do, and have done so now for 8 years...
ChuckXX profile picture
Samuel; As usual a very nice well written article. Just a couple of things: Any article on EPD it should be hammered home that it MUST be owned in a “personal account” outside of a retirement account to MAXIMIZE the actual tax benefits of a MLP such as EPD. And finally with this crazy raging INFLATION I dare say for most folks a $50,000 annual income is most likely NOT going to be enough unless you enjoy staying home alot reading S A articles—-LOL. Thank You again.
houtex profile picture
“ the vast majority of its EBITDA from long-term fixed-fee, take-or-pay commodity price resistant contracts”

They say the majority is fee based (page 74 of the recent deck). Do you have a source for the “fixed” and “take or pay” prongs? I fear it’s become somewhat of a verbal tick to say “fixed fee take or pay” and that the data don’t actually support that here.

EPD is fine. I have no issue with them. I just want to make sure everyone understands the facts on the ground.
Samuel Smith profile picture
@houtex I was referring to a combination of each of those types.
houtex profile picture
houtex
Today, 10:24 AM
@Samuel Smith
You should clarify that. After all under your construction it would also be okay to say the majority of EBITDA comes from fixed fee crypto trading. A combination of fee-based and crypto trading provides a majority of their EBITDA.
ndardick profile picture
EPD is the very best indeed, which is why it's by far the largest position in our family's main portfolio of 30 stocks.

However, these daily articles touting EPD don't seem to move the price of the stock, which gyrates reliably around $26.50 recently. I'm neither adding nor trimming unless it moves from there by 20% or more, so I just read all of these positive headlines, collect my reliably increasing tax deferred distributions, and smile.
Samuel Smith profile picture
@ndardick thanks for sharing
mwh27 profile picture
@ndardick Unless you plan to sell -- it's actually better that the unit price doesn't rise, right?
ndardick profile picture
@mwh27 Actually, not from my perspective. It would make me smile even more if the price were at $30 instead of $26.50, because it would provide a greater Total Market Value of my Portfolio to enable me to increase the leveraged selling of put options that drives the S&P index beating performance of my portfolio.
H
Buy DRIP Repeat
w
wabrauer
Today, 9:31 AM
Taxation of the dividends was not discussed and to net 50k you would need significantly more than quoted, though not all the eggs in one basket we hope.
R
@wabrauer
EPD pays a distribution not a dividend and the distribution passes tax free , so the author’s figure at EPD’ S current distribution of 7.8 % is correct
h
@Samuel Smith No longer "correct" if you're in my happy situation. I bought EPD shortly after it went public. I have received so much "return of capital" that I now have a negative cost basis and pay capital gains taxes on return of capital distributions. I'm not complaining and share your strong buy recommendation. The distributions are a nice support of my own retirement.
mdpath profile picture
Long EDP and after reading your article, I may add more.
Disagree with this article? Submit your own. To report a factual error in this article, . Your feedback matters to us!
To ensure this doesn’t happen in the future, please enable Javascript and cookies in your browser.
Is this happening to you frequently? Please report it on our feedback forum.
If you have an ad-blocker enabled you may be blocked from proceeding. Please disable your ad-blocker and refresh.