Entering text into the input field will update the search result below

Occidental Petroleum: Buffett's Likely Wrong

Jordan Sauer profile picture
Jordan Sauer
4.26K Followers

Summary

  • Warren Buffett's likely to be disappointed by his $25 billion investment in no moat Occidental Petroleum.
  • OXY has a high breakeven price and is thus a bet on oil staying elevated. It may make a better hedge than an investment.
  • This article offers insights into how profitable OXY would be at $60 per barrel Brent.
  • I expect long-term returns of 5% per annum.

Warren Buffett Testifies Before Senate Finance Committee

Alex Wong

The Thesis

Watching oil stocks crash in 2020, I opened a small position in Occidental Petroleum (NYSE:OXY) and Imperial Oil (IMO), with average purchase prices around $13 for OXY and $14 for IMO. I would be a much

This article was written by

Jordan Sauer profile picture
4.26K Followers
A natural contrarian, business graduate, and value investor, I seek opportunities in the market that present outsized returns. I am constantly analyzing financial statements, stress-testing my opinions, and studying the principles of great investors.

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have a beneficial long position in the shares of PBR, SHEL either through stock ownership, options, or other derivatives. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

Recommended For You

Comments (10)

jodihn profile picture
jodihn
Today, 11:04 AM
In addition to what is written below you did not mention the CCUS. That, in itself, has a whole range of viable opportunities (tax credits, voluntary credits, fuels, Net Zero oil, NetPower, EOR, utilizing OxyChem product in the process, etc.) that will bring in $B to OXY and Buffett is certainly interested in that. First DAC online in 2025.

Share count reduction will be a big + and I suspect once the warrants from Pref./Common are settled the count will be 700M - pre-Anadarko count. I think this will be sometime in 2028.
Pepdog profile picture
Pepdog
Today, 10:38 AM
Zero mention of supply/demand dynamics for O&G (that’s a huge factor here).
T
... so reading in-between the lines. it's " I'm smart I bought OXY and IMO at cheap levels but sold off and took gain. Shouldn't have sold though" then it's " here's why Warren Buffett is wrong to be buying and I'm right even though I missed some profits". Are you some billionaire I've never heard of? Buffett is buying in and I'm at 6x already with my $10 basis. I didn't sell. The reason I did not is OXY owns/controls the best land in the permian. Vicki H started at the bottom in exploration and knows that whoever controls the permian controls american oil. at 12.5M bpd. We are one of the largest producers in the world.
Zach.Terpstra profile picture
Important to note three things:

1. Berkshire is buying each investment within the context of the total portfolio. Owning quality “oil users” and “oil producers” are good hedges against one another.

2. If you look at the inflation adjusted average price of crude and do the same for $OXY, adding back dividends and negating public share adjustments, the share price moves with oil in a statistically significant manner. You’re buying oil that produces dividends and buybacks. Better than buying oil itself as a hedge.

3. $OXY has a strong mid stream and chemical marketing segment, neither of which were quantified into this analysis. I don’t believe this to be a standard oil producer and instead see them as a a company trying to create the lowest cost domestic barrel of oil they can by using all arms of their business. It won’t be a home run in five years, but it could be in 30 if you’re diligent and reinvest dividends.
Jordan Sauer profile picture
@Zach.Terpstra Agree on all points. As I said, I think it's more of a hedge than an investment, it was a much better investment in 2020 and early 2021. Now I like the global oil producers that have a wide cost moat, world-class LNG business, and/or currency tailwind at far lower valuations.
Gary Kime profile picture
Is there a chance you have an opinion on AAPL, BAC, AXP, KO, Japanese trading firms, CVX, railroads, energy companies, insurance companies, I’d like to put them all together so we can get the greatest investor of all time back on track!
elliot_mllr profile picture
It is amazing that the author asserts insights that he asserts are missing in Warren Buffett.
e
I put my money on Buffett over you. He has one thing you don’t have, experience!

He doesn’t day trade like you do. He buys companies with moats.

Get a clue
Jordan Sauer profile picture
@energyguy921 I'd be cautious and do the work. Both Occidental and Chevron don't have a moat because their breakeven prices are higher than global peers. Buffett could be right if oil stays high, but I don't like to make commodity bets.
Disagree with this article? Submit your own. To report a factual error in this article, . Your feedback matters to us!
To ensure this doesn’t happen in the future, please enable Javascript and cookies in your browser.
Is this happening to you frequently? Please report it on our feedback forum.
If you have an ad-blocker enabled you may be blocked from proceeding. Please disable your ad-blocker and refresh.