The False Abe Fortas Analogy

His corrupt behavior on the Supreme Court was unlike anything the current Justices are accused of.

Journal Editorial Report: 'Ethics' is the latest weapon against the Court's independence. Images: Reuters/Getty Images Composite: Mark Kelly

Abe Fortas has been in the news of late—a feat for someone who died in 1982. Amid a campaign by Democrats and partisan journalists to tar conservative Supreme Court justices for “ethics” violations, outlets including the New York Times, the Washington Post and NPR have cited the example of Fortas’s 1969 resignation, implying that the justices they disfavor might want to follow it.

But there’s no parallel. Fortas embodied cronyism and corruption, with direct conflicts of interest involving parties with business before the high court and legal advice to a businessman who was investigated, indicted and convicted of federal felonies. He also acted as a regular adviser to a president whose administration, like every administration, was a repeat Supreme Court litigant. None of the currently serving justices have been accused of anything remotely comparable.

Opinion

Copyright ©2023 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Continue reading your article with
a WSJ subscription

Subscribe Now

Already a subscriber? Sign In

Sponsored Offers
  • TurboTax:
    Save up to $15 with TurboTax coupon May 2023
  • The Motley Fool:
    Epic Bundle - 3x Expert Stock Recommendations
  • H&R Block Tax:
    15% Off DIY Online Tax Filing Services | H&R Block Coupon Code
  • Top Resume:
    10% TopResume Discount Code for expert resume-writing services
  • eBay:
    30% off eBay coupon
  • Groupon:
    Exclusive Groupon Promo Code - 30% Off Local Experiences