The FDIC Guarantees Instability

The ‘system-wide’ deposit backing only kicks in once a bank fails, so potential buyers wait for the subsidy.

Wonder Land: Whether it's the border, the economy or crime, the progressive way of governance is that no policy mistake can change—ever. Images: AP/AFP/Getty Images Composite: Mark Kelly

Officials at the Treasury, Federal Reserve and Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. have worked feverishly since March’s run on Silicon Valley Bank to shore up confidence in the regional banking system. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen and Fed Chairman Jerome Powell implied that the FDIC would cover all depositors. Rather than stabilize the system, their ad hoc approach has stirred panic.

The problem is that officials’ implied “systemwide” guarantee of uninsured depositors isn’t really systemwide. During the 2008 financial crisis, policy makers created the Transaction Account Guarantee Program, which offered an unlimited guarantee on non-interest-bearing deposit accounts. But the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010 required an act of Congress to backstop uninsured deposits. Otherwise, the FDIC can offer coverage only when a bank has already failed and gone into FDIC receivership—as Signature Bank and SVB did.

Opinion

Copyright ©2023 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Continue reading your article with
a WSJ subscription

Subscribe Now

Already a subscriber? Sign In

Sponsored Offers
  • TurboTax:
    Save up to $15 with TurboTax coupon May 2023
  • The Motley Fool:
    Epic Bundle - 3x Expert Stock Recommendations
  • H&R Block Tax:
    15% Off DIY Online Tax Filing Services | H&R Block Coupon Code
  • Top Resume:
    10% TopResume Discount Code for expert resume-writing services
  • eBay:
    30% off eBay coupon
  • Groupon:
    Exclusive Groupon Promo Code - 30% Off Local Experiences