close

NCLAT sets aside CCI penalty on ITC for not furnishing info on Savlon deal

ITC had 2017 acquired the antiseptic brand Savlon and the personal care product brand Shower To Shower from Johnson & Johnson Private

Press Trust of India New Delhi
Will take action against firms such as Liberty House: NCLAT

Listen to This Article

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has set aside the penalty imposed on multi-conglomerate ITC by fair trade regulator CCI for not notifying for the acquisition of brands 'Savlon' and 'Shower to Shower' in 2017.

ITC had 2017 acquired the antiseptic brand Savlon and the personal care product brand Shower To Shower from Johnson & Johnson Private.

The Competition Commission of India (CCI) had on December 11, 2017, imposed a fine of Rs 5 lakh on ITC for alleged failure to give notice under sub-section 2 of Section 6 of the Competition Act.

The section mandates the enterprise, which proposes to enter into a combination, to give notice to the CCI disclosing the details of the proposed combination, within 30 days.

However, the CCI's order was challenged by ITC before the NCLAT, which is an appellate authority contending that the value of the deal was Rs 68.37 crore, hence, as per the rules and regulations, there was no need for any such notification.

They were exempted under the de minimis notification, which says any combination which involves the target company having an asset value or turnover below Rs 350 crore or Rs 1,000 crore, respectively, falls within its scope.

Also Read

ITC rally has more legs on FMCG biz scale up, high cigarette vols: Analysts

NCLAT upholds Competition Commission's Rs 1,337 crore penalty on Google

NCLAT directs Google to pay 10% of Rs 1,337 crore penalty imposed by CCI

Google may face a third CCI fine in less than a month. Now for Android TV

NCLAT declines stay on CCI's Rs 936 cr Google penalty, asks firm to pay 10%

Tata Play's confidentially filed IPO gets market regulator Sebi go-ahead

Tata Play, ideaForge Technology get Sebi's go ahead to float IPOs

Prudent to wait for judiciary to run its course on Go First, says Scindia

Hindustan Zinc bids to buy assets from Vedanta Group for $2.98 billion

Bharti Airtel announces merger of Sri Lankan operations with Dialog Axiata

Consenting to it, a two-member NCLAT bench said "no penalty was required" to be imposed on the ITC and set aside the impugned order passed by the Competition Commission of India (CCI).

"We, therefore, hold that the penalty imposed by the CCI on ITC for the reason it did not notify the transactions I and II under section 6(2) of the Act, should not have been imposed and to that extent, we set aside the impugned order of the CCI," said NCLAT in its judgement passed on April 27, 2023.

However, it also added, "insofar as other issues relating to the 'combination' and which have not been pressed in the present appeal during arguments are concerned, we only wish to mention that those issues are left open and not decided in this judgment".

Interestingly, almost 9 months before the penalty, CCI had on March 22, 2017, unconditionally approved the transactions under Section 31(1) of the Act after finding that there was no 'appreciable adverse effect on competition' in the defined relevant markets.

But thereafter it issued a show cause notice on March 29, 2017 to ITC under Section 43A, directing it to file a response to the show cause notice for not filing the transactions under Section 6(2) for approval of the CCI.

Section 43A grants CCI power to impose penalty for non-furnishing of information on combinations.

(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

First Published: May 02 2023 | 8:18 PM IST