5 Relatively Safe And Cheap Dividend Stocks To Invest In - April 2023

Author's Note: This is our monthly series on Dividend Stocks, usually published in the first week of every month. We scan the entire universe of roughly 7,500 stocks that are listed and traded on U.S. exchanges and use our proprietary filtering criteria to select five stocks that are relatively safe and maybe trading cheaper compared to their historical valuations. Some of the sections in the article, like 'Selection Process/Methodology,' are repeated each month with few changes. This is intentional as well as unavoidable, as this is necessary for the new readers to be able to conceptualize the process. Regular readers of this series could skip such sections to avoid repetitiveness.

************

A lot has happened between our last month's report and today. We saw a glimpse of the banking crisis that unfolded due to the failure of SVB (Silicon Valley Bank) and a couple of other regional banks. However, the contagion was contained by the swift actions of the Feds and the Treasury (irrespective of its moral hazards). Since then, the market has gained some of its mojo back. But we are not sure if the positive momentum has much left to run.

The Fed is still raising the interest rates, though at a slower pace. The so-called Fed pivot (when they start lowering the rates) is still not there in sight. In all probabilities, they are likely to keep rates higher and longer unless something breaks in the financial system or there is a deep recession. Either scenario does not look good.

The year 2022 was a tough year for all kinds of investors. We can certainly hope that 2023 will be better, but the storm clouds have not cleared yet, and a lot of uncertainties and stress points remain. Against this backdrop, it is important to keep some cash reserves and dry powder ready to be able to deal with any scenario. At the same time, we believe it is not possible to catch the exact bottom (or the peak), so it is best to invest regularly and consistently in good, solid dividend-paying stocks when their valuations are attractive.

The main goal of this series of articles is to shortlist and highlight companies that have a solid history of paying and raising dividends. In addition, we demand that these companies support strong fundamentals, carry low debt, and are offered at a relatively cheaper valuation. These DGI stocks are not going to make anyone rich overnight, but if your goal is to attain financial freedom by owning stocks that would grow dividends over time, meaningfully and sustainably, then you are at the right place. These lists are not necessarily recommendations to buy but a shortlist of probable candidates for further research. The purpose is to keep our buy list handy and dry powder ready so that we can use the opportunity when the time is right. Besides, every month, this analysis is able to highlight a few companies that otherwise would not be on our radar.

Every month, we start with roughly 7,500 stocks that are listed and traded on U.S. exchanges, including over-the-counter (OTC) networks. By using our filtering criteria, the initial list is quickly narrowed down to roughly 700 stocks, which are mostly dividend-paying and dividend-growing stocks. From thereon, by using various data elements, including dividend history, payout ratios, revenue growth, debt ratios, EPS growth, etc., we calculate a 'Dividend Quality Score' for each stock that measures the relative safety and sustainability of the dividend. In addition to dividend safety, we also seek cheaper valuations. We also demand that the selected companies have an established business model, solid dividend history, manageable debt, and investment-grade credit rating.

This month, we highlight three groups with five stocks each that have an average dividend yield (as a group) of 3.11%, 5.28%, and 7.05%, respectively. The first list is for conservative and risk-averse investors, while the second one is for investors who seek higher yields but still want relatively safe dividends. The third group is for yield-hungry investors but comes with an elevated risk, and we urge investors to exercise caution.

Notes: 1) Please note that when we use the term "safe" in relation to stocks and investments, it should be interpreted as "relatively safe" because nothing is absolutely safe in investing. Even though we present only 5 to 10 stocks in our final list, one should have 15-20 stocks at a minimum in a well-diversified portfolio.

2) All tables in this article are created by the author unless explicitly specified. The stock data have been sourced from various sources such as Seeking Alpha, Yahoo Finance, GuruFocus, and CCC-List (drip investing).

The Selection Process

Note: Regular readers of this series could skip this section to avoid repetitiveness. However, we include this section for new readers to provide the necessary background and perspective.

Goals:

We start with a fairly simple goal. We want to shortlist five companies that are large-cap, relatively safe, dividend-paying, and trading at relatively cheaper valuations in comparison to the broader market. The objective is to highlight some of the dividend-paying and dividend-growing companies that may be offering juicy dividends due to a temporary decline in their share prices. The excess decline may be due to an industry-wide decline or some kind of one-time setbacks like some negative news coverage or missing quarterly earnings expectations. We adopt a methodical approach to filter down the 7,500-plus companies into a small subset.

Our primary goal is income that should increase over time at a rate that at least beats inflation. Our secondary goal is to grow the capital and provide a cumulative growth rate of 9%-10% at a minimum. These goals are, by and large, in alignment with most retirees and income investors, as well as DGI investors. A balanced DGI portfolio should keep a mix of high-yield, low-growth stocks along with some high-growth but low-yield stocks. That said, how you mix the two will depend upon your personal situation, including income needs, time horizon, and risk tolerance.

A well-diversified portfolio would normally consist of more than just five stocks and preferably a few stocks from each sector of the economy. However, in this periodic series, we try to shortlist and highlight just five stocks that may fit the goals of most income and DGI investors. But at the same time, we try to ensure that such companies are trading at attractive or reasonable valuations. However, as always, we recommend you do your due diligence before making any decision on them.

Selection Criteria:

The S&P 500 currently yields less than 1.60%. Since our goal is to find companies for a dividend income portfolio, we should logically look for companies that pay yields that are at least similar to or better than the S&P 500. Of course, the higher, the better, but at the same time, we should not try to chase very high yields. If we try to filter for dividend stocks paying at least 1.50% or above, nearly 2,000 such companies are trading on U.S. exchanges, including OTC networks. We will limit our choices to companies that have a market cap of at least $10 billion and a daily trading volume of more than 100,000 shares. We also will check that dividend growth over the last five years is positive, but there can be some exceptions.

We also want stocks that are trading at relatively cheaper valuations. But at this stage, we want to keep our criteria broad enough to keep all the good candidates on the list. So, we will measure the distance from the 52-week high but save it to use at a later stage. Also, at this initial stage, we include all companies that yield 1% or higher. In addition, we also include other lower-yielding but high-quality companies at this stage.

Criteria to Shortlist:

• Market cap > $10 billion ($8 billion in a down market)
• Dividend yield > 1.0% (some exceptions are made to include high quality but lower yielding companies)
• Daily average volume > 100,000
• Dividend growth past five years >= 0.

By applying the above criteria, we got around 600 companies.

Narrowing Down the List

As a first step, we would like to eliminate stocks that have less than five years of dividend growth history. We cross-check our current list of over 600 stocks against the list of so-called Dividend Champions, Contenders, and Challengers originally defined and created by David Fish. Generally, the stocks with more than 25 years of dividend increases are called dividend Champions, while stocks with more than ten but less than 25 years of dividend increases are termed, Contenders. Further, stocks with more than five but less than ten years of dividend increases are called Challengers. Also, since we want a lot of flexibility and wider choice at this initial stage, we include some companies that pay dividends lower than 1.50% but otherwise have a stellar dividend record and growing dividends at a fast pace.

After we apply all the above criteria, we're left with roughly 312 companies on our list. However, so far in this list, we have demanded five or more years of consistent dividend growth. But what if a company had a very stable record of dividend payments but did not increase the dividends from one year to another? At times, some of these companies are foreign-based companies, and due to currency fluctuations, their dividends may appear to have been cut in US dollars, but in reality, that may not be true at all when looked at in the actual currency of reporting. At times, we may provide some exceptions when a company may have cut the dividend in the past but otherwise looks compelling. So, by relaxing some of the conditions, a total of 74 additional companies were considered to be on our list. We call them category 'B' companies. After including them, we had a total of 386 (312 + 74) companies that made our first list.

We then imported the various data elements from many sources, including CCC-list, GuruFocus, Fidelity, Morningstar, and Seeking Alpha, among others, and assigned weights based on different criteria as listed below:

• Current yield: Indicates the yield based on the current price.
• Dividend growth history (number of years of dividend growth): This provides information on how many years a company has paid and increased dividends on a consistent basis. For stocks under the category 'B' (defined above), we consider the total number of consecutive years of dividends paid rather than the number of years of dividend growth.
• Payout ratio: This indicates how comfortably the company can pay the dividend from its earnings. We prefer this ratio to be as low as possible, which would indicate the company's ability to grow the dividend in the future. This ratio is calculated by dividing the dividend amount per share by the EPS (earnings per share). The cash-flow payout ratio is calculated by dividing the dividend amount paid per share by the cash flow generated per share.
• Past five-year and 10-year dividend growth: Even though it's the dividend growth rate from the past, this does indicate how fast the company has been able to grow its earnings and dividends in the recent past. The recent past is the best indicator that we have to know what to expect in the next few years.
• EPS growth (average of previous five years of growth and expected next five years' growth): As the earnings of a company grow, more than likely, dividends will grow accordingly. We will take into account the previous five years' actual EPS growth and the estimated EPS growth for the next five years. We will add the two numbers and assign weights.
• Chowder number: So, what's the Chowder number? This number has been named after well-known SA author Chowder, who first coined and popularized this factor. This number is derived by adding the current yield and the past five years' dividend growth rate. A Chowder number of "12" or more ("8" for utilities) is considered good.
• Debt/equity ratio: This ratio will tell us about the debt load of the company in relation to its equity. We all know that too much debt can lead to major problems, even for well-known companies. The lower this ratio, the better it is. Sometimes, we find this ratio to be negative or unavailable, even for well-known companies. This can happen for a myriad of reasons and is not always a reason for concern. This is why we use this ratio in combination with the debt/asset ratio (covered next).
• Debt/asset ratio: This ratio will tell us about the debt load in relation to the total assets of the company. In almost all cases, this ratio would be lower than the debt/equity ratio. Also, this ratio is important because, for some companies, the debt/equity ratio is not a reliable indicator.
• S&P's credit rating: This is the credit rating assigned by the rating agency S&P Global and is indicative of the company's ability to service its debt. This rating can be obtained from the S&P website.
• PEG ratio: This also is called the price/earnings-to-growth ratio. The PEG ratio is considered to be an indicator if the stock is overvalued, undervalued, or fairly priced. A lower PEG may indicate that a stock is undervalued. However, PEG for a company may differ significantly from one reported source to another, depending on which growth estimate is used in the calculation. Some use past growth, while others may use future expected growth. We're taking the PEG from the CCC list wherever available. The CCC list defines it as the price/earnings ratio divided by the five-year estimated growth rate.
• Distance from 52-week high: We want to select companies that are good, solid companies but also are trading at cheaper valuations currently. They may be cheaper due to some temporary down cycle or some combination of bad news or simply having a bad quarter. This criterion will help bring such companies (with a cheaper valuation) near the top as long as they excel in other criteria as well. This factor is calculated as (current price - 52-week high) / 52-week high.
• Sales or Revenue growth: This is the average growth rate in annual sales or revenue of the company over the last five years. A company can only grow its earnings power as long as it can grow its revenue. Sure, it can grow the earnings by cutting costs, but that can't go on forever.

Downloadable Dataset:

Below we provide a link to the table with relevant data on 360 stocks. This table can be downloaded by readers for further analysis. Please note that the table is sorted on the "Total Weight" or the "Quality Score."

File-for-export---_5_DGI_for_April_2023.xlsx

Selection Of The Top 50

We will first bring down the list to roughly 60 names by automated criteria, as listed below. In the second step, which is mostly manual, we will bring the list down to about 30.

• Step 1: First, take the top 20 names from the above table (based on total weight or quality score).
• Step 2: As a second step, we will take the top 10 names based on the highest dividend yield. When it comes to dividend yield, some of the industry segments tend to be overcrowded. So, we will take the top two (or max three) names from any single industry segment. We take the top 10 stocks after the sort to the final list.
• Step 3: Now, we will sort our list based on five-year dividend growth (highest at the top) and select the top 10 names.
• Step 4: We also want to give priority to stocks that are rated highest in terms of credit rating. So, we will sort the list based on the numerical weight of the credit rating and select the top 10 stocks with the best credit rating. Again, we are careful not to have too many names from the same sector.
• Step 5: Lastly, as the name of the series suggests, we want to have some names that may be trading cheaper in comparison to their historical valuation. So, we select the top ten names with the highest discount. However, we need to be careful that they meet our other quality criteria.

From the above steps, we now have a total of 64 names (some categories had more than 10) in our final consideration. However, the following stocks appeared more than once:

Stocks that appeared two times:

AAP, ADP, BXP, CI, CVX, KEY, NEM, PXD, SWK, TFC (10 duplicates)

After removing nine duplicates, we are left with 54 (64-10) names.

Since there are multiple names in each industry segment, we will keep a maximum of two or three names (from the top) from any one segment. We keep the following:

Financial Services, Banking, and Insurance:

Banking:

Financial Services - Others: (V), (TFC), (MS)

Insurance: (OTCQX:ZURVY)

Business Services/ Consulting:

(ADP), (ACN)

Conglomerates:

(CSL)

Industrials:

(SWK), (BALL)

Transportation/ Logistics:

Chemicals:

Materials/Mining/Gold:

Materials: (NTR),

Mining (other than Gold): (VALE), (SCCO)

Gold: (NEM)

Defense:

None

Consumer/Retail/Others:

Cons-Staples: (ADM), (TSN)

Cons-discretionary: (AAP)

Cons-Retail: (LOW), (TGT)

Communications/Media

(VZ)

Healthcare:

Pharma: (PFE), (JNJ), (MRK)

Healthcare Ins: (UNH), (CI)

Technology:

(TSM), (MSFT)

Energy:

Pipelines/ Midstream: (ENB), (MPLX), (ET)

Oil & Gas (prod. & exploration): (CTRA), (EOG), (CVX)

Utilities:

(NRG)

Housing/ Construction:

(LEN)

REIT:

(CPT), (INVH), (BXP)

Final Step: Narrowing Down To Just Five Companies

In this step, we construct three separate lists of five stocks each, with different sets of goals, dividend income, and risk levels.

The lists are:

1) Conservative Dividend list,

2) Moderately High Dividend List,

3) Ultra High Dividend List, and

4) A combined list of the above three (duplicates removed).

Out of the top 50 (54 to be precise), we make our judgment calls to make these three lists, so basically, the selections are based on our research and perceptions. So, while most of the filtering was based on automated criteria, the last step is a subjective one. We try to make each of the three lists highly diversified among various sectors and industry segments and try to ensure that the safety of dividends matches the overall risk profile of the group. We certainly encourage readers to do further research on the highlighted names.

Nonetheless, here are our three final lists for this month:

Final A-List (Conservative Safe Income):

Average yield: 3.04%

• (CTRA)
• (CSL)
• (ADP)
• (UNH)
• (SWK)

Table-1A: A-LIST (Conservative Income)

**CTRA - Dividend yield has been calculated based on the most recent quarterly dividend amount of $0.20 per share, plus some rough estimates for the variable amount. In the most recent quarter, $0.37 was paid as a variable amount, but it has come down from a level of $0.53 from the previous quarter. It is important to know the variable amount is variable and has been coming down for some time and is subject to change every quarter. The dividend yield shown in the table above (for CTRA) is simply our estimate for 2023 for the purpose of our rating calculations and may not reflect the actual yield. Please note that most financial websites show yield without including the variable amount.

We think this set of five companies (in the A-List) would form a solid diversified group of dividend companies that would be appealing to income-seeking and conservative investors, including retirees and near-retirees. The average yield of 3.11% is almost double of the S&P500. The average dividend growth history is nearly 34 years, and the average discount from a 52-week high is very attractive for these stocks at -27%. Also, three of the five companies have an excellent credit rating of A- or higher. If you must need even higher dividends, consider B-List or C-List, presented later.

CTRA (Coterra Energy):

We may have seen the peak price of oil in the year 2022. That's why the investment thesis for most energy companies has changed for 2023, and CTRA is no exception. In the year 2023, the oil prices are likely to be lower than 2022 levels but still remain elevated due to limited supply and the continued war in Eastern Europe. Moreover, natural gas prices have come down significantly from the peak of 2022. CTRA earns nearly 2/3rd of its total revenue from natural gas and the rest from oil products. So, due to the significant weakness in natural gas, this is a minus. That said, there is an opportunity going forward for the company to supply liquified NG to Europe, as Europe's supply from Russia appears to be permanently impacted. In a nutshell, CTRA is a solid energy company and is likely to do well as the world will keep using these products for a long time in spite of the push for green energy. Moreover, it currently provides a very high level of dividend yield, though its variable dividend has been coming down for the last few quarters and is likely to moderate further in 2023. The stock price appears to be undervalued and nearly 30% down from its 52-week high.

CSL (Carlisle Companies):

CSL is a global company that manufactures a diverse range of products, including highly engineered products. Its manufactures products for commercial roofing, architectural metal, and specialty polyurethane. It caters to customers in diverse sectors, such as aerospace, medical, defense, transportation, and industrials. It has paid and raised the dividend for the past 47 years and is just shy of 3 years of being a dividend king. The company's stock is trading at an attractive valuation and is nearly 30% below its 52-week high. Although the dividend yield is still too low at 1.33%, this is one of the safest, low-risk dividend aristocrats out there. We include this in our A-List for the reasons of safety, dividend reliability, and relatively cheaper valuation.

ADP (Automatic Data Processing) has been selected for the reliability and growth of its dividends. Even though its current yield is mediocre, growth should compensate in the long run.

SWK (Stanley Black & Decker):

If you are looking for value and an attractive dividend yield, then this is your pick. The current yield is quite attractive at nearly 4%, substantially higher than its long-term yield of 2%. Is it a value trap? There is always some risk, but it does not look like one. This is one of the few companies in the industrial sector that has provided growing dividends for more than 50 years. The company has run into some issues during and post-pandemic, especially in terms of inventory buildup and a significant uptick in COGs (cost of goods sold). This resulted in paltry bet margins in 2022. This has forced the management to embark on cost-cutting. The good news is that in spite of cost-cutting measures, the company has managed to grow its revenue. The company has paid a dividend for 146 years and raised them every year for 56 years. They also increased the dividend in 2022, indicating that there is no immediate threat to the dividend. However, we must add that there are no guarantees. We feel that the stock price is undervalued by about 15-20%, and the issues that are impacting the stock price are temporary and will likely resolve. However, we must add that there are no guarantees.

Final B-List (High Yield, Moderately Safe):

Average yield: 5.28%

• (PFE)
• (ADP)
• (NRG)
• (MPLX)
• (VZ)

Note 1: Very often, we include a few low-risk stocks in B-List and C-list. Also, oftentimes, a stock can appear in multiple lists. This is done on purpose. We try to make each of our lists fairly diversified among different sectors/industry segments of the economy. We try to include a few of the highly conservative names in the high-yield list to make the overall group much safer.

Note 2: MPLX is a Mid-stream Partnership and issues the K1 tax form instead of 1099-Div (for corporations).

Table-1B: B-LIST (High Yield)

MPLX (MPLX LP):

In the B-List and C-List, we have replaced CTRA with MPLX for higher yield (current yield being 9%) and also due to the fact that some of CTRA dividend payout is variable and may get reduced in 2023. MPLX is a midstream energy company with excellent operating history. Its dividend appears to be safe as it recently increased the payout by 10%. That said, the stock price appears to be fairly valued.

VZ (Verizon):

In the B-List and C-list, we have included the high-yielding stock Verizon. Only a couple of years back, VZ would have been categorized as a conservative dividend stock. However, the company has hit a perfect storm in the form of slowing growth, increased competition, a very high debt burden, and a high (and still rising) interest rate environment. The combination of these factors has caused the stock to decline by over 30%. However, we believe the stock is offering a much better value compared to just a year ago. It offers a very attractive dividend yield at these levels. Also, one could sell monthly covered calls on this stock to boost the effective yield to almost 10%.

PFE (Pfizer):

We include Pfizer in our B-List for several reasons, as it appeared last month as well. It promises to be a compelling investment with a much higher yield (nearly 4%) and a relatively cheaper valuation. The stock price has seen some weakness due to the Covid reset and the expected decline in Covid-related revenue going forward, even though it reported $1.8 Billion of revenue from Paxlovid alone in the 4th Quarter of 2022. However, the stock appears to be undervalued as it is down nearly 20% from its peak in 2022. It has also committed to much higher R&D spending going forward. The company has announced that it will acquire the biotech company Seagen (SGEN) for $43 billion. The deal is expensive, but it will add long-term value to Pfizer. When the deal goes through, it is possible that the company may look at cutting some expenses, including reducing the dividend payout to some extent. So, the current yield should be taken with a grain of salt.

NRG (NRG Energy, Inc):

NRG is an Electric Utility company that serves nearly 6 million retail customers in the U.S. and Canada. They generate electricity from a wide variety of sources, including natural gas, oil, coal, nuclear, as well as wind and solar. The company has a history of buying back shares which is a positive for the existing shareholders. Since Utilities are slow-growing companies, by buying back shares, it can grow its earning metrics much faster without growing the business. That said, NRG is also growing its revenue and operating income at a healthy pace and has relatively good financials. A word of caution, though. The company cut its dividend in 2016 to pay down its high debt. Even though the dividend was restored to exceed the previous levels in 2020 and has been growing since then, it tells us the company would not be shy of cutting the dividend in the future if a need arises. However, currently, there are no such indications, and debt-to-income ratios are quite reasonable. The current yield is quite attractive at 4.45%.

In the B-List, the overall risk profile of the group becomes slightly elevated compared to A-List. That said, the group (as a whole) will likely provide safe dividends for many years. This list offers an average yield for the group of 5.28%, an average of 20 years of dividend history, and an average discount of -21% (from 52-week highs).

Final C-LIST (Yield-Hungry, Less Safe):

Average yield: 7.05%

• (NRG)
• (BXP)
• (MPLX)
• (VZ)
• (BTI)

Notes:

Note 1: Oftentimes, a stock can appear in multiple lists. We try to include one or two conservative names in the high-yield list to make the overall group much safer.

Note 2: MPLX is a Mid-stream Partnership and issues the K1 tax form instead of 1099-Div (for corporations).

Table-1C: C-LIST (Yield-Hungry, Elevated Risk)

BXP (Boston Properties):

BXP is a REIT (Real Estate Investment Trust) that specializes in the Commercial Office space sector. However, it owns and operates some of the best office space in some of the key locations in the U.S. Post-pandemic, the market is pricing a total collapse in commercial real estate. However, in the post-covid world, the reality is somewhat mixed. Especially for BXP, the occupancy has been quite stable all through Covid and now inching up post-pandemic. The stock price has lost nearly 60% of its value in the last year, and at these levels, the downside is very limited. Due to the price decline, the dividend yield has gone very high to 7.3%, which is quite tempting. Since the FFO is likely to remain stable (increased in 2022 but will decline in 2023), the dividend is well covered. With a relatively safe dividend yield of above 7%, even a 3% annual appreciation in the stock price should be good enough for income investors. The work-from-home culture may have seen its peak, and that bodes well for BXP with its prime properties.

Apparently, this list (C-List) is for yield-hungry DGI investors. The yield goes up as much as 7% or more. However, this list is not for conservative investors. As you can see, the average credit rating of this set of companies is much lower than the A-List. We urge due diligence to determine if it would suit your personal situation. Nothing comes for free, so there will be more risk involved with this group. That said, it's a highly diversified group spread among five different sectors.

We may like to caution that each company comes with certain risks and concerns. Sometimes these risks are real, but other times, they may be a bit overblown and temporary. So, it's always recommended to do further research and due diligence.

What If We Were to Combine the Three Lists?

If we were to combine the three lists and thereafter remove the duplicates (because of combining), we would be left with 11 names. However, between CTRA, and MPLX (both from the Energy sector), we keep MPLX, so we now have ten names. The combined list is highly diversified in many industry segments. The stats for the group of 10 are as follows:

Average yield: 4.82%

Average discount (from 52WK High): -27.22%

Average 5-Yr dividend growth: 12.85%

Average Payout Ratio: 47.09%

Average Quality Score: 76.92

Table 2:

Conclusion

In the first week of every month, we start with a fairly large list of dividend-paying stocks and filter our way down to just a handful of stocks that meet our selection criteria and income goals. In this article, we have presented three groups of stocks (five each) with different goals in mind to suit the varying needs of a wider audience. Even though the risk profile of each group is different, each group in itself is fairly balanced and diversified.

The first group of five stocks is for conservative investors who prioritize the safety of the dividend and the preservation of their capital. The second group reaches for a higher yield but with only a slightly higher risk. However, the C-group comes with an elevated risk and is certainly not suited for everyone.

This month, the first group yields 3.11%, while the second group elevates the yield to 5.28%. We also presented a C-List for yield-hungry investors with a 7.05% yield. The combined group (all three lists combined with duplication removed) offers an even more diversified group with ten positions and a 4.82% yield.

High Income DIY Portfolios: The primary goal of our "High Income DIY Portfolios" Marketplace service is high income with low risk and preservation of capital. It provides DIY investors with vital information and portfolio/asset allocation strategies to help create stable, long-term passive income with sustainable yields. We believe it's appropriate for income-seeking investors including retirees or near-retirees. We provide ten portfolios: 3 buy-and-hold and 7 Rotational portfolios. This includes two High-Income portfolios, a DGI portfolio, a conservative strategy for 401K accounts, and a few High-Growth portfolios. For more details or a two-week free trial, please click here.