In a shocking incident, an air hostess who came from Dubai to Bengaluru to meet her boyfriend fell from the fourth floor on Saturday at midnight. Police have arrested her boyfriend on the suspicion of his role in the woman’s death and booked him in a murder case.

According to the reports, Archana Dhiman arrived in Bengaluru just four days prior to her death. The 28-year-old was staying with her boyfriend Adesh, a software engineer in an IT firm, at an apartment in Renuka Residency society in Koramangala – a plush suburb in the city.

During the interrogation, Adesh told police that he and Archana had been drinking on the night of the accident. At around 12 am, Archana went to the balcony and slipped off the fourth-floor balcony. He said he immediately took her to the balcony where the doctors declared her brought dead.

Police suspect that the woman’s boyfriend might have killed her and have sent him to police custody. During the interrogation, it was found the couple used to fight often. According to the reports, the couple went to watch a film on Friday night and got into an argument when they returned home.

The investigating officers said Archana and Adesh met on a dating site and had been in a relationship for the last six months. But, recently, they were facing ups and downs in their relationship due to frequent fights. The official said Archana had come to Bengaluru to meet Adesh as they decided to part ways.

Archana’s body has been sent for post-mortem. Police are looking into the matter and are waiting for her post-mortem report to initiate further action.

A five-judge Constitution bench will decide upon legalizing same-sex marriages in India on April 18 and proceedings of the hearing will be streamed live as the issue of “seminal importance”, the Supreme Court said on Monday.

A bench comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, Justice PS Narasimha, and Justice JB Pardiwala, which today heard the combined pleas seeking the legalization of the gay marriages under the Special Marriage Act in the country said that a constitution bench of five judges would on April 18 further decide the fate of such matrimonies.

Noting that the issue was of “seminal importance” and any decision on the same would have a huge impact on the Indian society and will impact entire social fabric as a whole, the apex court noted Article 145(3) mandates that such a matter of law, which requires interpreting the constitution, must be decided by a five-judge Constitution bench of the Supreme Court.

The Centre has opposed the pleas arguing that gay marriages are incompatible with the “Indian family unit” consisting of a husband, a wife and their children which inevitably presupposes a biological man as a ‘husband’, a biological woman as a ‘wife’ and the children born out of the wedlock reared by the biological man as father and the biological woman as mother.

The BJP-led central government, in its affidavit filed before the top court, said that the petitioners cannot claim a fundamental right for same-sex marriage to be recognised under Indian laws despite consensual gay being decriminalized in the Supreme Court’s landmark 2018 judgement.

The government further argued that legalizing gay marriages would wreck the delicate balance between personal laws and accepted societal values in the country. Law Minister Kiren Rijiju, Monday, noted that the institution of marriage is a matter of policy, even though doesn’t disturb personal freedom and activities of individuals.

Representing the Centre, Solicitor-General Tushar Mehta argued that giving legal status to gay marriages would trigger legal issues as marriage is a contract between a biological male and biological female in every major religion, not just among Hindus, but also in Islam.

The Centre’s council raised the legal status of adoption by a gay couple saying that the Parliament will have to examine will of the people and child’s and decide whether it can be raised in a such environment.

He said that the Parliament will have to factor in societal ethos while taking such a decision.

However, CJI Chandrachud retorted that the adopted child of a gay or lesbian couple does not have to be a gay or lesbian solicitor.

On January 6, the apex court had transferred and clubbed to itself, all such pleas pending in different high courts, including the Delhi High Court.

In its January 6 order, it had asked Advocate Arundhati Katju—representing the petitioners—and the Central government’s counsel, to prepare together a common compilation of the written submissions, documents and precedents on which reliance would be placed during the course of the hearing.

The petitioners’ counsel had requested the Supreme Court bench to transfer all such cases itself for an authoritative pronouncement on the issue and that the Centre can file its response in the top court.

Earlier, on January 3, the Supreme Court had said it would hear on January 6 the pleas seeking a transfer of petitions for recognition of same-sex marriages pending before the high courts to the top court.

The Supreme Court had in December last year sought the Centre’s response to two pleas seeking a transfer of the petitions pending in the Delhi High Court for directions to recognize same-sex marriages to itself.

Earlier on November 25 last year, the top court had sought the Centre’s response to separate pleas moved by two gay couples seeking enforcement of their right to marry and a direction to the authorities concerned to register their marriages under the Special Marriage Act.

A bench headed by CJI Chandrachud, who was also part of the Constitution bench that decriminalised consensual gay sex in its 2018 landmark judgement, issued a notice to the Centre in November last year, besides seeking Attorney General R Venkataramani’s assistance in dealing with the pleas.

The petitions have sought a direction that the right to marry a person of one’s choice be extended to LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer) people as part of their fundamental right. One petition seeks a reinterpretation of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 in a gender-neutral manner where a person is not discriminated against due to his sexual orientation.

On September 2018, a five-judge Constitution bench of the Supreme Court, issued a landmark judgement wherein it decriminalized consensual gay sex among adults. It struck down a part of the British-era penal law under Article 377, on grounds that it violated the constitutional right to equality and dignity.

In its pathbreaking judgement, the apex court ruled that section 377 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) that criminalised consensual gay sex was “irrational, indefensible and manifestly arbitrary”. The top court had said that the 158-year-old law had become an “odious weapon” to harass the LGBTQ community by subjecting its members to discrimination and unequal treatment.

Punjab Education Minister Harjot Singh Bains will wed IPS officer Jyoti Yadav later this month, according to party sources.

Bains, a first-time AAP MLA from the Anandpur Sahib constituency in Punjab’s Rupnagar district, got engaged to Yadav recently, and the couple will tie the knot by the end of this month.

Bains, 32, an advocate by profession hailing from Gambhirpur village in Anandpur Sahib, was the president of the Aam Aadmi Party’s youth wing in Punjab and unsuccessfully contested the 2017 polls from the Sahnewal constituency.

Bains, who completed his BA LLB (Hons) from Panjab University in Chandigarh in 2014 and also earned a certificate in International Human Rights Law from the London School of Economics in 2018, was elected as a first-time legislator from the Anandpur Sahib Assembly constituency in 2022 Punjab Legislative Assembly election.

He is currently the education minister of Punjab in the cabinet of Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann’s AAP government in the state.

Read Also: Lok Sabha adjourned after BJP ruckus over Rahul Gandhi’s UK remarks; no place for democracy under Modi rule, says Kharge

A resident of Haryana’s Gurugram, Jyoti Yadav, a Punjab-cadre IPS officer, currently posted as superintendent of police in Mansa district, was in the spotlight last year after a public argument with AAP MLA Rajinderpal Kaur Chhina, who accused the officer of conducting a search operation in her assembly area without informing her.

At the time, Yadav, then posted as the assistant commissioner of police in Ludhiana, had told the Ludhiana South MLA that she was directed to conduct the search operation against anti-social elements by the police commissioner.

AAP leaders in Punjab have been on a wedding spree since the party came to power in the state last year. CM Bhagwant Mann married Gurpreet Kaur while AAP MLAs Narinder Kaur Bharaj and Narinderpal Singh Sawana also tied the knot during this time.

Punjab Assembly Speaker Kultar Singh Sandhwan congratulated, the soon-to-be couple who are “going to start a new journey of their lives in (the) coming days”.

Karnataka BJP MLA says Azaan on loudspeakers gives him a headache

Woman accuses Maharashtra BJP MLA, his supporters of assault, molestation; FIR registered