The Nebraska Legislature stands at the precipice of passing a ban on abortions after six weeks.
Based on interviews and a tally by the Flatwater Free Press, LB626 appears to need just two votes to have enough support to become law.
Twenty-nine state senators, including Omaha Democrat Sen. Mike McDonnell, signed onto the bill as co-sponsors. Two other Republicans told Flatwater Free Press they support it.
That leaves the bill two votes shy of the 33 needed to overcome a filibuster.
One remaining Republican, Sen. Tom Brandt of Plymouth, said in an interview he’s strongly leaning toward voting for it. The other, new Sen. Christy Armendariz of Omaha, has privately expressed her support, according to Sen. Joni Albrecht, a Republican from Thurston who introduced the bill.
Assuming all the bill’s co-sponsors maintain their support, votes from Brandt and Armendariz would clear the way for the bill to pass — a move that would end most legal abortions after about six weeks.
People are also reading…
Albrecht told the Flatwater Free Press she feels good about the bill. But she stopped short of 100% confidence.
“I won't know until the day that eight hours (of debate) are up, you know, whether they just give me cloture (to end a filibuster) or they vote for the bill,” she said. “I don't have a crystal ball, but I'm still confident that those that did sign on are still with me.”
Albrecht
There are still several steps before the proposal could reach a final vote. Sen. Megan Hunt, a Democrat from Omaha, said if supporters successfully push the bill across the finish line, she’s determined to make it come at a cost.
“I know it's gonna be a tight vote,” Hunt said. “But I know that there are four or five senators who have conflicted personal feelings about abortion. … I feel like the work I have to do — that we have to do — between now and when we take that final vote is making sure that these lawmakers who might be on the fence really consult their conscience and they really understand that this is the most devastating bill for women in the history of our state.”
Nebraska currently outlaws abortion 20 weeks after fertilization. Last year, Albrecht proposed a bill that would have effectively banned all abortions if the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade.
That bill barely failed to overcome a filibuster on a 31-15 vote.
After the session adjourned, the Supreme Court did overturn Roe v. Wade, turning decisions on limiting abortion over to individual states.
This year, LB626 would require doctors to check for cardiac activity in an embryo and prohibit abortions after activity is detected. Other differences between it and last year’s proposal include intended exceptions for sexual assault and incest and language meant to explicitly exclude in vitro fertilization and ectopic pregnancies. Potential consequences for doctors who violate the law would be professional rather than criminal.
As of December 2022, abortion was unavailable in 14 states, with courts blocking ban enforcement in eight more, according to the Guttmacher Institute, a pro-abortion rights organization that tracks state policies.
Pew last polled Nebraskans on the issue in 2014, finding that 50% believed abortion should be legal in all or most cases, while 46% thought it should be illegal in all or most cases.
The ACLU of Nebraska, which opposes LB626, said a poll it commissioned in November showed 59% of respondents opposed “state senators enacting more restrictive abortion bans.” A poll of 400 Nebraska voters commissioned by Holland Children’s Institute in October found a majority of respondents believe abortion should be legal in most cases.
A survey commissioned by Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, which supports abortion restrictions, found a majority of Nebraskans supported “a bill outlawing abortions once a heartbeat is detected or in the case of rape, incest, or to save a mother’s life,” according to a polling memo.
McDonnell, the registered Democrat from Omaha who is among the 29 co-sponsors, described his stance as “pro-life from conception to natural death and in between.”
Two senators who are registered Republicans and didn’t co-sponsor the bill, Sen. Ben Hansen of Blair and Speaker John Arch of La Vista, told the Flatwater Free Press that they support the bill.
That leaves the two Republicans whose votes are less certain: Brandt and Armendariz.
Tom Brandt
Brandt was hesitant to comment, but told the Flatwater Free Press he’s “leaning toward (supporting) it, heavily.”
In an interview with radio station KWBE in August, Brandt said he was in Wichita, Kansas, a couple weeks before voters there soundly rejected a proposed constitutional amendment that would have eliminated the right to an abortion.
"You just sort of get a sense from talking to people that they have some reasonableness on rape, incest, life of the mother ... health care ... how far should a policy making organization like a legislature interfere with what goes on between a doctor and his (or her) patient,” he’s quoted saying.
Armendariz was endorsed by Nebraska Right to Life in her 2022 race and said on Facebook:
“Now more than ever, Nebraskans are wanting to learn where their candidates are on the issue of life, and I want you to know that I believe that all life is precious!”
Christy Armendariz
She told the Flatwater Free Press that she’s not comfortable being characterized as leaning one way or another on the abortion ban.
“For this one, it’s just so important that I really want to spend all of the time I can possibly spend listening to everybody,” she said.
But Albrecht said Armendariz told her “she's definitely going to vote for the bill” but wants to listen to all debate.
Even if the supporters of further restricting abortion in Nebraska lose a Republican, they have two more registered Democrats, Sens. Justin Wayne of Omaha and Lynne Walz of Fremont, who may go either way.
Walz said she struggled with the vote to block last year’s proposal. She did ultimately vote against ending the filibuster, but said she “cried all day.” It’s a “faith issue” for her, she said.
In 2020, she voted in favor of a bill that banned abortions by dilation and evacuation. Walz told the Flatwater Free Press she doesn’t know yet how she’ll vote this year.
Wayne was marked “excused not voting” for votes on last year’s bill and the 2020 bill.
Hunt
Albrecht told the Flatwater Free Press that, after last year’s vote, Wayne told her he would “give her cloture” — that he would help a bill overcome a filibuster and therefore become law.
Wayne said he didn’t remember that conversation. A special session didn’t happen. Abortion is a “personal choice,” Wayne said, and it’s tough to write a bill that reflects “the gravity of that choice.”
He said he hasn’t had time to read the bill. But he’s heard things about the proposal that concern him.
“If some of the issues in the bill — or some of the things that I’ve heard in the bill — are true I’m probably not supporting it,” he said. “I generally wouldn’t support a six-week ban, I think some people don’t even recognize that they’re pregnant by then. But, again, I haven’t read this bill.”
Sen. Carol Blood of Bellevue has made clear that her views on abortion are nuanced. However, she suggested in a text message that she won’t vote for this year’s proposal.
“I feel we have a good balance in Nebraska that respects life and protects our medical community and that at this time we have good middle ground without new legislation,” she said.
More than 85% of current abortions in Nebraska occur at six weeks or later, according to data reported to the state in 2021.
That severe restriction of abortion has abortion rights supporter Hunt promising that she’ll do whatever she can to stop it.
“We cannot let them get away with this easily,” Hunt said. “Not just the abortion debate needs to be bad. Every debate needs to be bad. Every day at work needs to be bad. They have to dread coming here every day because they know it's going to be bad. And until they can expect that, I mean, that's just — I feel like that's the only tool I have.”
The Flatwater Free Press is Nebraska’s first independent, nonprofit newsroom focused on investigations and feature stories that matter.
Less than one year after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade the state of abortion in America is fractured. Piecemeal laws creating a patchwork of access and blockades around the nation look to be continually changing in 2023. "The crisis continues and is continuing to get worse," said Morgan Hopkins, president of All* Above All."After 50 years of federal judicial micromanagement, Dobbs returned the abortion issue to the states, resulting in the enactment of Senate Bill One," said Tom Fisher, Indiana's Solicitor General.On the local level, Republican-led states are taking wide-ranging approaches to stripping access and creating punishment. A Tennessee bill would jail women for at least to three years who make "false" statements to police to get abortions that in the same legislation would allow abortion in cases or rape and incest. A Texas law would fine district attorneys who dont prosecute abortion cases. Oklahoma and Arkansas have bills that would criminalize women seeking abortion care. "It's completely out of touch with where Americans are, and we're the majority of people in this country want to go. You're seeing really amazing, bold action at the local level with cities funding travel for abortion, care, or setting up funds to pay for abortion care directly," Hopkins said. But the next frontier of the fight on both sides looks to be medication abortion. The issue crept up during the pandemic and has only ballooned since. SEE MORE: Sen. Kaine discusses President's address, economy, reelection and moreSenate Democrats are urging abortion pill manufacturers to add miscarriage management to its approved label. Abortion pill manufacturer GenBioPro is suing to allow the FDA approved medication to be sent to West Virginia where it is basically banned. The FDA has the power to regulate which drugs are sold in the U.S. and no state has been allowed to overrule it. Republican attorneys general are warning pharmacies like CVS and Walgreens not to mail prescriptions to their states after the Department of Justice said abortion pills can be mailed under federal law. Abortion rights advocates say they need to hear more from the president on this. "We want to hear from the President what actions the administration is prepared to take, and what bold and creative solutions and commitments they are making in the executive branch, and in the other agencies. They need to continue to explore as many creative avenues as possible especially, you know, with the pending threat to medication abortion. HHS potentially has a huge role to play here as does DOJ," Hopkins said. President Joe Bidens departments of Justice and Health and Human Services have filed various suits. The administration promised to protect women who have to travel for abortions, in addition to protecting access for veterans and their families no matter which state theyre living in.