Religious freedom doesn’t include fundamental right to convert, Centre tells SC

The Centre’s submission came in response to a plea by lawyer and BJP leader Ashwini Upadhyay.

Published: 29th November 2022 08:34 AM  |   Last Updated: 29th November 2022 08:34 AM   |  A+A-

Supreme Court

A view of the Supreme Court. (Photo | EPS)

Express News Service

NEW DELHI: The Centre on Monday told the Supreme Court that the right to freedom of religion enshrined under Article 25 of the Constitution does not include a fundamental right to convert people to a particular religion, not in the least if it is done through fraud, deception, coercion or allurement.

The Centre’s submission came in response to a plea by lawyer and BJP leader Ashwini Upadhyay. “The Union of India is cognizant of the gravity and the seriousness of the issue raised in the present writ petition. It is submitted that such enactments are necessary for protecting cherished rights of vulnerable sections of the society including women and economically and socially backward classes,” the Centre’s affidavit stated. 

Upadhyay’s plea had sought to declare religious conversions by means of fraud, threat, or monetary benefits as violative of fundamental rights. The Supreme Court asked the Centre to get information from all states on the steps taken by them in this regard. “This is a very serious issue. There cannot be any forced conversion & that’s what we are concerned of,” a bench of Justices M R Shah and C T Ravikumar said. 

The Centre said in its affidavit that Odisha, Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, Karnataka and Haryana already have a legislation to curb this practice. 
Earlier, the bench had said that everyone has the right to freedom of religion but not by forced conversion, which it termed “a very dangerous thing”. It added that such practices might affect the security of the nation. Upadhyay’s plea was filed against the backdrop of the suicide of 17-year-old Lavanya in Tamil Nadu. 

Next hearing on Dec 5
While deferring hearing on the matter to December 5, the court asked the Centre to find out information on what the states have done in the matter. The bench said instead of issuing notice to each state, it was asking the Centre to collate info


India Matters

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.