Punjab High Court quashes FIRs against Kumar Vishwas, Tajinder Pal Singh Bagga 

The single-judge bench of Justice Anoop Chitkara passed two separate orders quashing the FIRs.

Published: 13th October 2022 09:01 AM  |   Last Updated: 13th October 2022 09:01 AM   |  A+A-

Former AAP leader Kumar Vishwas

Former AAP leader Kumar Vishwas (File photo| PTI)

Express News Service

CHANDIGARH:  In a major embarrassment to the Bhagwant Mann-led AAP government, the Punjab and Haryana High Court on Wednesday quashed two separate FIRs registered against former AAP leader Kumar Vishwas and BJP leader Tajinder Pal Singh Bagga by the state police soon after AAP came to power in the state.

Both Vishwas and Bagga were booked in April by the Punjab Police. While the charge against Vishwas included his inflammatory statements against AAP’s national convener and Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal, Bagga was booked on the charges of making provocative statements, promoting enmity and criminal intimidation.

A Punjab Police team went to arrest Bagga from his residence in Delhi. But it was stopped by the Haryana Police in Kurukshetra while being taken to Punjab. He was brought back to the national capital by Delhi Police hours later.

The single-judge bench of Justice Anoop Chitkara passed two separate orders quashing the FIRs. “The facts and circumstances peculiar to this case, the court’s non-interference would result in a miscarriage of justice. Thus, the court invokes the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC and quashes the FIR and all subsequent proceedings against the petitioner,” the judge said in his order in the case of Vishwas.

In the Bagga case, the judge said, “It is a case where the continuation of criminal proceedings shall amount to an abuse of the process of law.” The court then quashed the FIR and all subsequent proceedings.”
The state police on April 20 visited Vishwas’home in Ghaziabad and summoned him for questioning. The court found no substance in the charges made against him.

On the charge of promoting enmity, the court observed that even if every word of the FIR and the statement in the Vishwas’ interview is taken as a gospel truth, it will still not constitute any offence under section 153-A of the IPC, as the element of culpability and intention was missing. The judge quoted former Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru and Benjamin Franklin, one of the founding fathers of the USA, in his order stating that there cannot be any democracy without freedom of choice and free speech.

“At the stroke of midnight, apart from liberty, we got azadi of choice and azadi of free speech and of expression; and we took a great leap forward by endorsing democracy, ushering in equality and dignity, ensuring infinite opportunities to preserve and spearhead this fantastic diversity till eternity,” observed the judge.

In the case of BJP leader Bagga, the judge said Section 153-A of the IPC applies when a person promotes enmity between groups based on religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, etc., and acts prejudicial to maintaining harmony. Meanwhile, Vishwas and Bagga thanked the judiciary.

Punjab and Haryana HC cites freedom of speech
Both Vishwas and Bagga were booked in April by the Punjab Police. While the charge against Vishwas included his inflammatory statements against AAP’s national convener and Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal, Bagga was booked on the charges of making provocative statements, promoting enmity and criminal intimidation


India Matters

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.