Lion sculpture atop new Parliament building doesn’t violate State Emblem Act: SC 

“It depends on the mind of the person who sees it. It’s your perception. It does not violate any law,” SC observed while challenging the lion sculpture installed on the top of the new Parliament.

Published: 30th September 2022 03:07 PM  |   Last Updated: 30th September 2022 03:07 PM   |  A+A-

Central Vista

Grand Central Vista (File Photo)

Express News Service

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday held that the lion sculpture installed atop the new Parliament building under construction as part of the Central Vista project does not violate the State Emblem of India (Prohibition of Improper Use) Act, 2005.

“It depends on the mind of the person who sees it. It’s your perception. It does not violate any law,” SC observed while challenging the lion sculpture installed on the top of the new Parliament.

A bench of Justices MR Shah and Krishna Murari in their order said, “Having gone through the emblem, it can’t be said that it’s in contravention to the provisions of the act. It cannot be said that any of the prisons of act 2005 are violated. States emblem of India of Central Vista project cannot be said to be in violation of the act as alleged.”

The lawyers in the plea had argued before the bench that the national emblem is a symbol of national honour and heritage. He also added that there could not be artistic innovation with respect to the approved design of the national emblem. 

The plea had argued that "Visible changes: have been made in the approved design of the official emblem and the look of the Ashoka pillar lions violated the State Emblem of India (Prohibition Against Improper Use) Act."

The plea also said that said lions portrayed in the emblem appear to be "ferocious and aggressive" with their "mouth open and teeth, fangs visible” and the change in the design of the State emblem was manifestly arbitrary, violated its sanctity and would not pass the muster of Article 14 of the Constitution of India."

Rein in his plea had further stated that the act of the Union Government to impinge upon the emblem without following due process was in derogation of Article 21, which envisaged the right to 'one's national pride and constitutional faith'.


India Matters

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.