Hathras conspiracy case: Supreme Court agrees to hear journalist Siddique Kappan’s plea seeking bail

Assailing the HC’s order, Kappan in the plea has contended that the HC has mechanically dismissed his bail without affording any cogent reasons.

Published: 24th August 2022 01:28 PM  |   Last Updated: 24th August 2022 01:28 PM   |  A+A-

Supreme Court

Supreme Court (Photo | EPS)

By Express News Service

The Supreme Court on Wednesday agreed to list for Friday a petition by Kerala journalist Siddique Kappan seeking bail in the “Hathras Conspiracy case”.

The petition where Kappan has challenged Allahabad HC’s order dated August 2, 2022 of rejecting him bail was mentioned before the bench of CJI NV Ramana, Justices Hima Kohli and CT Ravikumar.

In October 2020, Kappan along with other accused were arrested by UP Police while they were proceeding to report the Hathras rape-murder crime. Initially, they were arrested under an apprehension to cause breach of peace but subsequently they were booked under Unlawful Activities Prevention Act alleging that in the wake of the Hathras gang rape they were trying to incite communal riots and disrupt social harmony in the backdrop of the Hathras gangrape-murder case.

It was also alleged in the FIR that the accused(s) were financed to go to Hathras by terrorist Gand in furtherance of a plan to spread disharmony in society and that the co-accused (s) collected funding from foreign nationals/mediums which were utilised by Kappan for in different mediums and by cash for illegal activities. It was also alleged that Kappan and the co-accused received large quantities totalling Rs 45,000 deposited by PFI in their account.

Assailing the HC’s order, Kappan in the plea has contended that the HC has mechanically dismissed his bail without affording any cogent reasons.

It has also been argued that the HC has failed to take note of the fact that FIR/charge-sheet ex facie does not make case for invocation of sections 17 (punishment for raising funds for the terrorist act) and 18 (punishment for conspiracy) of UAPA.

“Apart from a bald statement to the effect that a perusal of the charge sheet and documents adduced indicate that the offences have been committed, absolutely no reasons have been afforded to indicate as to how this conclusion has been arrived at,” plea states.


India Matters

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.