Despite murder of youngster working for MNC, accused walks free due to lack of technical evidence

The footage was also not taken into consideration as it was not presented as per the provisions of the Evidence Act.

Published: 20th June 2022 10:20 AM  |   Last Updated: 20th June 2022 10:20 AM   |  A+A-

CCTV Camera

Image used for representational purpose. (Photo | EPS)

Express News Service

HYDERABAD: Despite the brutal murder of a youngster working for an MNC in the city in 2016 being witnessed and the incident captured on CCTV camera, the accused managed to walk free on the basis of technical evidence and lack of motive. 

The court agreed with the defence counsel’s contention that “the prosecution failed to prove motive as alleged against the accused and also failure to conduct the test identification parade (TIP) of the accused, which is fatal to the case” and pronounced the verdict.

The brutal murder took place in March 2016 near a commercial complex in Secunderabad. The 24-year-old victim had just completed engineering and joined an MNC located at Manikonda. After completing work, he partied with his friends and was returning home. En route, he noticed the accused in a car and requested them to drop him in Secunderabad.

While on the move, an argument broke between the accused and the victim and the victim slapped one of them. Later, they forced him out of the vehicle and stabbed him to death. Though a patrol team chased the accused, they managed to escape.

A CCTV from the complex clearly showed the accused stabbing the victim and a guard, who also rushed to the rescue, noticed the murder. Both these pieces of evidence were produced before the court as strong evidence against the accused. 

The court pointed out that the investigation officer failed to send the CCTV footage to the Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) to ascertain its authencity. The footage was also not taken into consideration as it was not presented as per the provisions of the Evidence Act. The eyewitness too was declared as not reliable as the TIP was not conducted.  

“Though there was some evidence to show that the victim died due to stab injuries, the prosecution could not connect the accused to the offence and it had also miserably failed to establish the identity of the accused,” noted the court.
 


TAGS
Murder
India Matters

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.