Consumer Forum orders Telangana State Southern Power Distribution to pay Rs 1.7 lakhs

The Forum also directed that the Consumer's service category be changed from LT-Cat-VIII to LT-Cat-II immediately and that any bills raised under LT-Cat-VII against the connection be revised.

Published: 31st May 2022 03:27 AM  |   Last Updated: 31st May 2022 03:27 AM   |  A+A-

Electricity

Image used for representational purpose only.

By Express News Service

HYDERABAD: The TSSPDCL (Greater Hyderabad Area) Consumer Grievances Redressal Forum has directed the authorities to withdraw a back billing case involving an amount of Rs 1,77,059 within 15 days, and any payment made by the Consumer with regard to the case may be adjusted in the Consumer's future bills.

The Forum also directed that the Consumer's service category be changed from LT-Cat-VIII to LT-Cat-II immediately and that any bills raised under LT-Cat-VII against the consumer's service connection be revised under LT-Cat-II and that the compliance report be filed along with the consumer’s satisfactory letter.

Complainant Rama Subramanian Ashok Swamynathan, an authorised Signatory of Sterling Villas Owners Welfare Association, Gundlapochampally, Medchal District, filed a Grievance Complaint with the Consumer Grievances Redressal Forum, claiming that the allegations mentioned in a notice dated March 31, 2022, were false.

During the hearing, the complainant said that they have two Sterling Villas Owners Association service connections, one of which was utilised for street lighting, water supply, CCTV, and 91 Villas common electrical usages.

Another Sterling Avenues Private Limited utility connection was employed for building multi-storey apartments in Category-VIII. That the respondents registered a back billings case against one meter by altering the category to LT-Cat-VIII, temporary supply from LT-Cat-II, which is illegal and arbitrary.

The respondents' main contention was that after changing the title and category against the Consumer's service connection, the service was inspected by the Divisional Engineer, who discovered that the supply of service connection was being used for the construction of a multi-storey building, despite the fact that the service is in the commercial category.

As a result, the inspecting officer suggested back billing from December 10, 2020 to March 25, 2022, at a cost of `1,77,059.

After paying the aforementioned back billing amount or registering an objection with DE/OP/Medchal, the Consumer has filed this Complaint with the Forum. After reviewing all of the evidence, the forum issued an order in favour of the complainant


India Matters

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.