Ex-CBI officer Thiagarajan calls SC judgment historic

Thiagarajan said the SC would not have referred to his disclosure in freeing Perarivalan.

Published: 19th May 2022 07:42 AM  |   Last Updated: 19th May 2022 07:42 AM   |  A+A-

Supreme Court

Supreme Court (Photo | EPS)

Express News Service

CHENNAI: For 31 years, former CBI superintendent of police V Thiagarajan lived with the guilt of failing to record the confession of AG Perarivalan verbatim, which would have let the latter walk out a free man much earlier. “There was a lapse and you are responsible for it, and when you come out, you get all the brickbats... It’s an absolution of your lapse,” Thiagarjan said when asked how he lived with it.

The officer, in a 2013 interview and later in court, said he did not record the statement of Perarivalan in which he said he didn’t know why he was asked to buy batteries (which were used in the bomb that killed former PM Rajiv Gandhi). This was a critical piece of evidence because Perarivalan had no knowledge of the plot to kill the former PM. Thiagarajan had said then: “If he (Perarivalan) did not know that there was going to be a killing, how can you make him (a) party to the killing?”

Thiagarajan, who recorded the statement of the accused in the assassination case in 1991, said he felt like an insignificant part of the system at that time. He said he carried individually the burden of his omissions and commissions, for which the system too was responsible.

“Again, I insist that it’s not an alibi for your individual lapse. As an individual, you are responsible for your omissions and commissions. Having said that, there are institutional and systemic dimensions too,” he said.

“A slip-up can happen if you are investigating as a team... things are in flux. The investigating agency collects, assesses, and evaluates evidence, and when further evidence comes up, you go back and reappraise the older ones. In that process, it is quite likely you commit a slip-up. Anybody can commit a slip-up somewhere and that will result in the miscarriage of justice, if not subversion of it,” he said.

Thiagarajan said the SC would not have referred to his disclosure in freeing Perarivalan. “They have scrupulously refrained from mentioning that portion.” Calling the judgment historic, he said: “It not only released a man after 30 years but also reaffirmed the role of the Governor and the powers of our State in a federal setup.”


India Matters

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.