Must Read

Court denies bail to former JNU students’ leader Umar Khalid in 2020 Delhi riots case

The trial court had recently granted the first bail in the case to former councillor Ishrat Jahan on March 14. The court had also denied bail to two other accused, Gulfisha Fatima and Tasleem Ahmed, on March 16.

Written by Anand Mohan J | New Delhi |
Updated: March 24, 2022 1:14:31 pm
Khalid has been in jail since September 2020. (File Photo)

A district court Thursday denied bail to former Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) students’ leader Umar Khalid in connection with a Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Amendment Act (UAPA) case registered against him following the riots in Northeast Delhi.

The order was passed by Additional Sessions Judge Amitabh Rawat at the Karkardooma district court which has been hearing the bail application for 8 months and had deferred the order thrice in the past. The trial court had recently granted the first bail in the case to former councillor Ishrat Jahan on March 14. The court had also denied bail to two other accused, Gulfisha Fatima and Tasleem Ahmed, on March 16.

Umar’s lawyer, senior advocate Trideep Pais, had argued that the witnesses in this case were false and that the chargesheet was a figment of the investigating officer’s imagination as there was no evidence to show Umar’s involvement.

Pais had also called the chargesheet “rubbish” and said that “no one should be arrested in this case”. “The last person who travelled with someone and got into his mind was Voldemort from Harry Potter. Mere mind mein ghus gaye? (He has entered my mind),” Pais had argued.

Pais had submitted that the witnesses in the UAPA case made false statements and that “a case can’t be made on half-truths”. Pais added that the “witnesses were cherry picked by the police around Umar’s arrest”.

He submitted that a “protected witness was in touch with the local SHO, informing him about the planning of the northeast Delhi riots and questioned why riots took place in city if the police knew about the conspiracy”.

Pais had also informed that the police “wished to paint every accused with the same brush crumbles when you look at chargesheet”.

The prosecution, however, had drawn parallels between the planning of the riots to that of the 9/11 terror attacks in the United States of America. Special public prosecutor Amit Prasad had opposed Umar’s bail by saying that Pais may have talked about the web series, “Trial of the Chicago 7”, during his arguments, but “what was more relevant to be referred to was probably the incident of 9/11 which is very well reflected here”.

Prasad had said: “The issue for the accused was not CAA-NRC. The issue was you had to somehow embarrass the government and take steps which will reflect in international media.”

The SPP told the court that all 25 sites where protests against the Citizenship (Amendment) Act were held in Delhi were picked because of their proximity to mosques, but were “purposefully given secular names”.

Khalid has been in jail since September 2020.

For all the latest Delhi News, download Indian Express App.

  • Newsguard
  • The Indian Express website has been rated GREEN for its credibility and trustworthiness by Newsguard, a global service that rates news sources for their journalistic standards.
  • Newsguard
Advertisement
Live Blog

    Best of Express

    Advertisement

    Must Read

    Advertisement

    Buzzing Now

    Advertisement