Premium| Listen to this article |
Hijab controversy: There is no restriction on wearing Hijab in India with reasonable restrictions subject to institutional discipline, the Karnataka government on Tuesday told the High Court, which is hearing a batch of pleas challenging restrictions on hijab in educational institutions.
The right to wear the headscarf (hijab) falls under the category of 19(1)(A) and not Article 25 as has been argued by the petitioners, Karnataka Advocate General Prabhuling Navadgi said while countering countering the petitioner Muslim girls from Udupi district.
“The right to wear Hijab falls under Article 19(1)(A) and not Article 25. If one wishes to wear Hijab, then there is no restriction 'subject to the institutional discipline'," Navadgi told the the Karnataka High Court.
The AG further said the rights claimed under Article 19(1)(A) is related to Article 19(2) where the government places a reasonable restriction subjected to institutional restriction.
The full bench of Chief Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi, Justice J M Khazi and Justice Krishna M Dixit is hearing petitions seeking permission to wear Hijab inside the classroom.
The restriction in the present case is only inside the educational institutions and not anywhere else, the top law officer in the state said, adding that the independent claim of 19(1)(A) cannot go together with Article 25.
"The consequence of the demand to declare Hijab as an essential religious practice is huge because there is an element of compulsion or else you will be expelled from the community," Navadgi told the HC.
Article 19(1)(A) is related to the freedom of expression of the Indian constitution. The Article 19(2) says that nothing in sub clause (a) of clause ( 1 ) shall affect the operation of any existing law, or prevent the State from making any law, in so far as such law imposes reasonable restrictions on the exercise of the right conferred by the said sub clause in the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of the State, friendly relations with foreign States, public order, decency or morality or in relation to contempt of court, defamation or incitement to an offence.
Article 25 deals with freedom of conscience and free profession, practice and propagation of religion and says that subject to public order, morality and health and to the other provisions of this part, all persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practise and propagate religion.
The current controversy began in January this year when six girl students of a college in Udupi attended a press conference held by the Campus Front of India (CFI) protesting against the college authorities denying them entry into classrooms wearing hijab.
With inputs from PTI
Never miss a story! Stay connected and informed with Mint. Download our App Now!!