In a fresh twist to the long-drawn share dispute between SpiceJet's Ajay Singh and the airline's former promoter Kalanithi Maran, Maran and his KAL Airways rejected a new settlement offer by SpiceJet in Supreme Court on Monday.
Maninder Singh, a senior advocate from Karanjawala & Co, who appeared on behalf of Kal Airways said that as per the arbitral award itself, Spicejet will have to pay them Rs 920 crore and the settlement offer proposed by the airline is not acceptable for his client. The court after hearing the submissions of have listed the matter for arguments on March 2. Last week, the Supreme Court had asked Maran and Kal Airways to consider the offer by Spicejet.
SpiceJet had said in a statement that it offered to pay Rs 600 crore in cash in the share transfer case with its former promoter Kalanithi Maran and his firm KAL Airways for a full and final settlement of all disputes. The airline had claimed that of the principal amount of Rs 578 crore awarded in arbitration, it had already paid Rs 308 crore in cash and deposited a bank guarantee of Rs 270 crore.
According to Karanjawala & Co, "the offer proposed by Spicejet was that the airline is willing to give Rs 300 crore towards a full and final settlement of the dispute and the matter finally gets settled with no further litigation, or; Out of the Bank Guarantee of Rs 270 crore deposited with High Court, Spicejet will give Rs 100 crore for now "
The controversy kicked off in 2015 when Maran sold his 58.46 per cent stake, or 50.4 million shares, in SpiceJet to Singh for a nominal Rs 2 after the airline was hit by financial trouble. In 2016, Maran approached the court, citing a breach of the agreement by Singh for not issuing him 189 million share warrants and preference shares, despite his Rs 679-crore infusion. He claimed Rs 1,300 crore from SpiceJet and Singh due to this. In July 2016, the high court (HC) asked Maran and Singh to set up an arbitration tribunal.
The arbitration tribunal consisting of three retired judges from the SC - Arijit Pasayat, Hemant Laxman Gokhale, and K S P Radhakrishnan - had rejected the damages claim of Maran and KAL Airways against SpiceJet in 2018. In 2020, the HC asked the airline to submit Rs 243 crore to Maran on the issue and that got a stay from the SC in November 2020. Maran was before the apex court to lift the stay on a Delhi HC order.
In January, the Madras HC had dismissed an appeal moved by airline, challenging an order directing the winding up of the company and takeover of its assets by the official liquidator. This case is also before the SC now.
Dear Reader,
Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.
As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.
Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.
Digital Editor
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU