Journalists union, MediaOne employees move HC against order banning channel

The Kerala Union of Working Journalists (KUWJ), Pramod Raman -- editor of MediaOne -- and some employees of the channel moved two separate pleas

Topics
Kerala High Court | Journalism | Journalists

Press Trust of India  |  Kochi 

Kerala High Court, Kerala HC
Kerala High Court | Photo: Wikipedia

A trade union of working journalists, the editor of MediaOne and some of its employees have moved the against the central government's recent decision to bar the Malayalam news channel's telecast.

The Kerala Union of Working (KUWJ), Pramod Raman -- editor of MediaOne -- and some employees of the channel moved two separate pleas in the high court against the Centre's January 31 decision.

The high court, on February 3, listed both petitions on February 7 along with the plea moved earlier by Madhyamam Broadcasting Ltd -- which operates MediaOne -- against the bar on the channel's telecast.

The high court, on February 2, had put on hold till February 7 the Centre's decision and also called for the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) files relating to denial of security clearance to the news channel.

KUWJ and the MediaOne journalists, represented by senior advocate Jaju Babu, have contended before the high court that hundreds of employees of the channel will be deprived of a livelihood if the Centre's decision is not set aside.

Babu had told the court, on February 3, that the decision to bar the channel was taken without hearing it or its employees.

The journalists' union and the channel's employees have contended that no violation of the permission or any Act or rules have been alleged and therefore, the action taken by the Centre was "illegal and unconstitutional".

During the hearing on February 2, on the plea moved by Madhyamam, the Centre had told the high court that MHA denied security clearance to MediaOne over security concerns based on intelligence inputs.

The Centre had also said it was not required to disclose the reasons for denial of security clearance when there were security concerns.

It had also told the court that where security was concerned broadcast permissions can be revoked/cancelled without giving any notice or reasons.

The channel, on the other hand, had contended that MHA clearance was only required when applying for fresh permission/license and not at the time of renewal.

(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Dear Reader,


Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.

As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.

Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.

Digital Editor

Read our full coverage on Kerala High Court
First Published: Fri, February 04 2022. 12:48 IST
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU