23 names reiterated by SC for appointment as HC judges pending with govt

Names of 23 candidates recommended by various high court collegiums since 2018 and reiterated by the Supreme Court collegium were pending with the government at the end of 2021

Topics
Supreme Court | High Court | SC Collegium

Press Trust of India  |  New Delhi 

Names of 23 candidates recommended by various collegiums since 2018 and reiterated by the collegium were pending with the government at the end of 2021, people aware of the process of appointments to the higher judiciary have said.

At least seven high courts had recommended these names for appointment as (HC) judges, the sources said.

They said the 23 names were returned by the government with a request to reconsider.

But the (SC) collegium reiterated these names on different occasions.

Two of the names -- one for appointment as judge of the Karnataka HC and the other for appointment as judge of the Jammu and Kashmir HC -- have been reiterated by the to the government twice, they noted.

Both the candidates are advocates. While the name of the candidate from Jammu and Kashmir was recommended in 2018, the name of the candidate from Karnataka was recommended in 2019.

As on December 31, 2021, 23 such names recommended by various HC collegiums since 2018, and later reiterated by the after being returned by the Executive, were pending with the government.

In 2021, a total of 120 judges were appointed. In 2016, a record 126 HC judges were appointed.

The combined sanctioned strength of the 25 high courts is 1,098 and as on December 1, 2021, they were working with 696 judges -- a vacancy of 402.

The government has maintained that filling up of vacancies in the high courts is a continuous, integrated and collaborative process between the Executive and the Judiciary. It requires consultation and approval from various constitutional authorities both at the state and the central level.

(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Dear Reader,


Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.

As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.

Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.

Digital Editor

Read our full coverage on Supreme Court
First Published: Sun, January 02 2022. 15:43 IST
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU