Jon Batiste might be the Grammys biggest surprise: The multi-genre performer and recent Oscar winner made such an impression on voters that he scored the most nominations with 11 on Tuesday.
Batiste earned an album of the year nod for We Are along with record of the year with Freedom, a feel-good ode to the city of New Orleans.
His nominations span several genres including R&B, jazz, American roots music, classical and music video.
Justin Bieber, Doja Cat and HER each came away with the second-most nominations with eight by the time the Recording Academy was done announcing its nominees for its January 31 show.
Billie Eilish and Olivia Rodrigo both had seven nods.
Along with Batiste's surprise domination, another shock was The Weeknd nabbing three nominations after the pop star claimed he would not allow his label to submit his music.
Earlier this year, he angrily slammed the Grammys, calling them corrupt after he received zero nominations despite 2020's biggest single, Blinding Lights.
Even though The Weeknd said he would boycott future Grammys, he still became a nominee for his work on album of the year projects, including Doja Cat's deluxe edition Planet Her and Kanye West's Donda.
His third nomination was for his appearance on West's single Hurricane, which also features Lil Baby.
What I like is the fact that no one is thinking about what happened before, what was the controversy, what was the noise, or where was this artist making music last year, said Harvey Mason jr., the Recording Academy's CEO.
He said voters focused on the excellence of music while considering nominees like Batiste and Kacey Musgraves, whose work also crosses over into different categories.
The voters are truly evaluating music and not getting caught up in the reputations of any other outside noise or any history of artists, he continued.
With that in mind, I think they're voting for things that they are acknowledging as excellence.
Mason said he was pleased with the new peer-driven voting system after seeing the list of nominees.
He instituted the 10-3 initiative which allows the academy's more than 11,000 members to vote for up to 10 categories in three genres. All voters can vote for the top four awards.
The new system replaced the anonymous nominations review committee a group that determined the contenders for key awards.
Some claimed committee members favoured projects based on personal relationships and promoted projects they favored and worked on.
Harvey knows the new voting system might not be perfect at first, but he believes the initiative will produce fair results in the long run.
I know we didn't get every single one perfect, Harvey said. I know there will be some people that feel left out or that we missed a nomination here or there. That makes me sad because I don't want anybody to have that feeling. But I do feel like we're heading in the right direction. I'm pleased with the way our voters did the work.
For the first time, the academy expanded the number of nominees in the general field categories from eight to 10. The change impacts categories such as record, album, song of the year and best new artist.
Harvey said the academy increased slots in the general field categories after seeing an uptick voting participation over the past year along with the acceptance of new membership invitations and a high number of more than 21,730 entries submitted for Grammy consideration.
We thought the timing was right, he said.
We saw an opportunity to do what the academy does which is to highlight music, highlight the industry and highlight excellence in a bigger way.
With the change in our voting structure, we don't have the nomination review committee.
This gives our voters an opportunity to have their voice heard, but also gives them a chance to have a bigger pool to draw from when it comes time to that one winner that takes home the Grammy.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Dear Reader,
Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.
As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.
Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.
Digital Editor