Reply
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Registered User EiFit91's Avatar
    Join Date: Oct 2020
    Age: 51
    Posts: 894
    Rep Power: 5069
    EiFit91 is a name known to all. (+5000) EiFit91 is a name known to all. (+5000) EiFit91 is a name known to all. (+5000) EiFit91 is a name known to all. (+5000) EiFit91 is a name known to all. (+5000) EiFit91 is a name known to all. (+5000) EiFit91 is a name known to all. (+5000) EiFit91 is a name known to all. (+5000) EiFit91 is a name known to all. (+5000) EiFit91 is a name known to all. (+5000) EiFit91 is a name known to all. (+5000)
    EiFit91 is offline

    How to maximize muscle growth

    Recently published position stand on how to maximize muscle hypertrophy:

    https://journal.iusca.org/index.php/...rticle/view/81

    Most here are probably familiar with most of this but maybe some will still find it interesting (and maybe some disagree with some of the points)

    Infographic summarizing the key points:

    https://www.instagram.com/p/CS1gpLirOnR/
    The first principle is that you must not fool yourself—and you are the easiest person to fool.

    - Richard Feynman
    Reply With Quote

  2. #2
    Registered User EiFit91's Avatar
    Join Date: Oct 2020
    Age: 51
    Posts: 894
    Rep Power: 5069
    EiFit91 is a name known to all. (+5000) EiFit91 is a name known to all. (+5000) EiFit91 is a name known to all. (+5000) EiFit91 is a name known to all. (+5000) EiFit91 is a name known to all. (+5000) EiFit91 is a name known to all. (+5000) EiFit91 is a name known to all. (+5000) EiFit91 is a name known to all. (+5000) EiFit91 is a name known to all. (+5000) EiFit91 is a name known to all. (+5000) EiFit91 is a name known to all. (+5000)
    EiFit91 is offline
    One thought about volume:

    I think that at least in the studies that show improved outcomes on much higher volumes, though claiming sets are taken close to failure (or even to failure) the study participants aren’t actually training with that intensity. I don’t know how close to actual failure the studies that look at 10-20 sets are. I suspect that they are further from muscular failure than stated in the papers.

    The recent debate between Lyle McDonald and Mike Israetel on muscular failure is probably relevant here and is the main reason for my suspicion - along with the experience of actually working close to failure and thinking “how in the hell can people take 30+ sets to failure?”

    I think that unless failure occasionally happens, you are probably not training close to failure...

    (The debate I mentioned: https://bodyrecomposition.com/traini...ailing-to-fail)
    Last edited by EiFit91; Today at 02:15 AM.
    The first principle is that you must not fool yourself—and you are the easiest person to fool.

    - Richard Feynman
    Reply With Quote

  3. #3
    Registered User Heisman2's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2005
    Posts: 13,687
    Rep Power: 73717
    Heisman2 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Heisman2 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Heisman2 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Heisman2 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Heisman2 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Heisman2 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Heisman2 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Heisman2 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Heisman2 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Heisman2 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Heisman2 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)
    Heisman2 is offline
    I like the infographic on my website better. 😎

    In all seriousness, as they allude to in the infographic (I have not read the document) most variables do not matter much. The failure question is a big one, but keep in mind that a beginner using lighter weight without neuromuscular proficiency can likely go to failure more frequently and with shorter rest periods while inducing less fatigue than someone more advanced. Most of the actual research is not in well-trained people; that is a big caveat for people on this website with at least a decent amount of muscle mass.

    As an aside, it bothers me a bit that most of the hypertrophy field of research seems to come from the same handful of authors. Makes it much easier for bias to creep into everything.
    Reply With Quote

  4. #4
    Registered User EiFit91's Avatar
    Join Date: Oct 2020
    Age: 51
    Posts: 894
    Rep Power: 5069
    EiFit91 is a name known to all. (+5000) EiFit91 is a name known to all. (+5000) EiFit91 is a name known to all. (+5000) EiFit91 is a name known to all. (+5000) EiFit91 is a name known to all. (+5000) EiFit91 is a name known to all. (+5000) EiFit91 is a name known to all. (+5000) EiFit91 is a name known to all. (+5000) EiFit91 is a name known to all. (+5000) EiFit91 is a name known to all. (+5000) EiFit91 is a name known to all. (+5000)
    EiFit91 is offline
    Originally Posted by Heisman2 View Post
    As an aside, it bothers me a bit that most of the hypertrophy field of research seems to come from the same handful of authors. Makes it much easier for bias to creep into everything.
    Just looked at your infographic and I agree!

    This is a great point IMO. Lyle is sort of a douchebag on the sideline, but he is a necessary douchebag.
    Last edited by EiFit91; Today at 03:05 AM.
    The first principle is that you must not fool yourself—and you are the easiest person to fool.

    - Richard Feynman
    Reply With Quote

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts