1h ago

Everyone must obey the Constitution, FUL says in response to elections postponement bid

Share
0:00
play article
Subscribers can listen to this article
The IEC held by-elections in May.
The IEC held by-elections in May.
Sharon Seretlo/Gallo Images
  • Freedom Under Law says everyone must simply obey the Constitution.
  • The organisation believes that tampering with the intervals of elections has the potential to disrupt the country's democracy. 
  • The Electoral Commission of SA has applied to the apex court to have the upcoming local government elections postponed.

Freedom Under Law (FUL) has expressed concern about the Electoral Commission of SA's (IEC) recent court bid to have the local government elections postponed to February next year.

The organisation said on Thursday that either the Constitution should be amended to grant the court such power or it should be complied with.

FUL group CEO Nicole Fritz said: "The case has obvious political implications, but Freedom Under Law is concerned only with a constitutionally crucial objection to any attempt to circumvent the time limits laid down by the Constitution for our elections."

On Friday, the Constitutional Court will hear arguments from several political parties in what is expected to be a vigorously contested case.

They are opposing the IEC's application.

This, after the Constitutional Court gave the green light to the ANC, IFP, DA, African Transformation Movement, Forum4Service Delivery, Makana Independent New Deal and the One South Africa Movement to intervene in the application.

The move paves way for other interested parties to ventilate their issues in court on the postponement of the elections, News24 reported.

Freedom Under Law is expected to argue that everyone – the electorate, the political parties, the electoral commission, and the Constitutional Court – should simply obey and comply with the Constitution, emphasising that the certainty that elected representatives would be called to account at fixed intervals was an essential component of representative democracy. 

On Thursday, the group said tampering with constitutionally fixed intervals of elections for whatever reason "erodes their legitimacy - it is to disrupt the heartbeat of our democracy". 

It said the question was not whether it would be appropriate to postpone the elections, but whether the Constitutional Court had the power to do so:

It is, therefore no surprise that the Constitution makes no allowance for bending the rules regarding electoral timelines. Nobody, not even the Constitutional Court, has the power to depart [from] or allow departures from the clear limits set by the Constitution. "Even if the court could bend the Constitution, as a matter of constitutional principle, it should not. Hundreds of elections have been held around the world during the pandemic.

Earlier this month, the IEC urgently applied to the apex court postpone the October elections. Electoral bosses are concerned about holding elections while the country grapples with Covid-19.

The matter stems from the findings of an inquiry conducted by retired deputy chief justice Dikgang Moseneke on the feasibility of conducting elections amid the current third wave of infections.


Never miss a story. Choose from our range of newsletters to get the news you want delivered straight to your inbox.
We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24