• Contact
  • Advertise
  • Sign in
Legal Era
X
Sign in
  • Home
  • News
    +
    • From the Courts
    • Policy & Law
    • Supreme Court (India)
    • High Court (India)
    • TAX Updates
    • MARKET WATCH
    • Deal Street
    • Global Insights
    • IBC Cases
    • Hires & Moves
    • IP News
    • Competition Verdict
  • Articles
    +
    • ABOUT THE LAW
    • AWARDS & ACCOLADES
    • Aerospace
    • Agriculture
    • Alternate Dispute Resolution
    • Banking and Finance
    • Bankruptcy
    • Book Review
    • Bribery & Corruption
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Competition Law
    • Consumer Products
    • Corporate Governance
    • Covid-19
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Protection
    • Defence
    • E-commerce
    • Employment Law
    • Energy and Natural Resources
    • Entertainment and Sports Law
    • Environmental Law
    • FDI
    • Food and Beverage
    • Health Care
    • IBC Diaries
    • Insurance Law
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Law
    • Litigation
    • Litigation Funding
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Privacy
    • Private Equity
    • Project Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Risk and Compliance
    • Technology Media and Telecom
    • Tributes
    • Zoom In
    • Take On Board
    • In Focus
    • Law & Policy and Regulation
    • IP & Tech Era
    • Viewpoint
    • Arbitration & Mediation
    • Tax
    • Student Corner
  • Interviews
  • Law Firms
  • E-Magazine
  • Legal Era TV
  • Events
  • News
    • From the Courts
    • Policy & Law
    • Supreme Court (India)
    • High Court (India)
    • TAX Updates
    • MARKET WATCH
    • Deal Street
    • Global Insights
    • IBC Cases
    • Hires & Moves
    • IP News
    • Competition Verdict
  • Articles
    • ABOUT THE LAW
    • AWARDS & ACCOLADES
    • Aerospace
    • Agriculture
    • Alternate Dispute Resolution
    • Banking and Finance
    • Bankruptcy
    • Book Review
    • Bribery & Corruption
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Competition Law
    • Consumer Products
    • Corporate Governance
    • Covid-19
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Protection
    • Defence
    • E-commerce
    • Employment Law
    • Energy and Natural Resources
    • Entertainment and Sports Law
    • Environmental Law
    • FDI
    • Food and Beverage
    • Health Care
    • IBC Diaries
    • Insurance Law
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Law
    • Litigation
    • Litigation Funding
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Privacy
    • Private Equity
    • Project Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Risk and Compliance
    • Technology Media and Telecom
    • Tributes
    • Zoom In
    • Take On Board
    • In Focus
    • Law & Policy and Regulation
    • IP & Tech Era
    • Viewpoint
    • Arbitration & Mediation
    • Tax
    • Student Corner
  • Interviews
  • Law Firms
  • E-Magazine
  • Legal Era TV
  • Events

Top Stories

HomeNewsFrom the Courts
19 Aug 2021 4:30 AM GMT

Tripura High Court Orders Release Of Vehicles Detained For Not Carrying E-Way Bills

By Legal Era
E-Way-Bills

Tripura High Court Orders Release Of Vehicles Detained For Not Carrying E-Way Bills

Since the three detained vehicles were meant to provide ambulance services, the Court found it inappropriate to allow further detention of the vehicles

The Tripura High Court released vehicles since it was for the business of providing ambulance services, which were originally detained for not carrying e-way bills while being transported.

The Division Bench of the High Court of Tripura, comprising Chief Justice Akil Kureshi and Justice S.G. Chattopadhyay, dealt with the matter titled East India InfoTech Pvt Ltd v The State of Tripura & Ors.

The Petitioner – Company through a writ petition had challenged the action of the Respondent – Authorities in seizing and detaining three ambulances on the ground that the vehicles did not carry e-way bills while being transported by road from Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) to Agartala.

The Petitioner contended that all applicable taxes on these inter-state sales had been paid and, therefore, the detention and seizure of these vehicles were without any jurisdiction. On the other hand, the Respondent – Authorities submitted that the Petitioner had an alternative remedy wherein a show-cause notice was issued against the Petitioner by the Respondent – Authorities, but the Petitioner chose not to file a reply.

The Court, after going through the material on record, directed the Petitioner to file a reply to the show-cause notices in order to complete the assessment for levying tax with or without penalty.

However, the bench noted the prime defence of the Petitioner that he was not a registered dealer but wanted to start a business of providing ambulance service. Due to this reason, the Court found it inappropriate to allow further detention of the vehicles.

The Ambulances were thus released by the Court after imposing certain conditions, pending the final assessment before the appropriate authority.

Click to download here Full Order

Legal Era

Legal Era

TAGS:
  • Tripura High Court 
  • E-Way Bill 
  • East India InfoTech Pvt Ltd 
  • Justice Akil Kureshi 
  • Justice S.G. Chattopadhyay 
  • Ambulance service in Tripura 
Next Story
Similar Posts
See More
Trending Now
Recommended Articles
  • News
  • From the Courts
  • Supreme Court (India)
  • High Court (India)
  • Global Insights
  • Deal Street
  • Hires & Moves
  • Articles
  • Zoom In
  • Take On Board
  • In Focus
  • Law & Policy
  • IP & Tech Era
  • Viewpoint
  • Arbitration & Mediation
  • Tax
  • Student Corner
  • Interviews
  • Law Firms
  • E-Magazine
  • Legal Era TV
  • Events
Follow Us
Subscribe Newsletter
  • © All rights reserved Legal Era-Legal Media Group
  • Who We Are
  • Careers
  • Advertise with Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
Powered by  Hocalwire
X
X